The influence of the Stiles-Crawford peak location on visual performance

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 659-668

  Atchison, David A ^a   Marcos, Susana ^b   Scott, Dion H ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Filters; Optical quality of the human eye; Phase transfer; Stiles Crawford effect; Subjective transverse aberration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0347927559     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00681-8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Applegate R.A., Bonds A.B. Induced movement of receptor alignment towards a new pupillary aperture. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science. 21:1981;869-872.
2. Applegate R.A., Lakshminarayanan V. Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 10:1993;1611-1623.
3. Artal P., Marcos S., Iglesias I., Green D.G. Optical modulation transfer and contrast sensitivity with decentered small pupils in the human eye. Vision Research. 36:1996;3575-3586.
4. Atchison D.A., Scott D.H. Contrast sensitivity and the Stiles-Crawford effect. Vision Research. 42:2002a;1559-1569.
5. Atchison D.A., Scott D.H. The Stiles-Crawford effect and subjective measurement of aberrations. Vision Research. 42:2002b;1089-1102.
6. Atchison D.A., Scott D.H. Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 19:2002c;2180-2184.
7. Atchison D.A., Scott D.H., Strang N.C., Artal P. The influence of the Stiles-Crawford effect on visual acuity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 19:2002;1063-1073.
8. Atchison D.A., Woods R.L., Bradley A. Ocular transverse aberrations predict the complex effects of defocus on human contrast sensitivity function. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 15:1998;2536-2544.
9. Bonds A.B., MacLeod D.I.A. A displaced Stiles-Crawford effect associated with an eccentric pupil. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science. 17:1978;754-761.
10. Burns S.A., He J.C., Marcos S.M. The influence of cone directionality on optical image quality. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 39(Suppl.):1998;203.
11. Burns S.A., Marcos S. Evaluating the role of cone directionality in image formation. Vision science and its applications. OSA technical digest series. 2000;7-10 Optical Society of America, Washington, DC.
12. Campbell F.W. A retinal acuity direction effect. Journal of Physiology (London). 144:1958;25P-26P.
13. Chen B., Makous W. Light capture by human cones. Journal of Physiology (London). 414:1989;89-109.
14. Crewther D.P. The role of photoreceptors in the control of refractive state. Program on Retinal Eye Research. 19:2000;421-457.
15. Dunnewold, C. J. W. (1964). On the Campbell and Stiles-Crawford effects and their clinical importance. Institute for Perception. The Netherlands National Defence Research Organisation RVOTNO.
16. Enoch J.M. Marked accommodation, retinal stretch, monocular space perception, and retinal receptor orientation. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics. 52:1975;376-392.
17. Green D.G. Visual resolution when light enters the eye through different parts of the pupil. Journal of Physiology (London). 190:1967;583-593.
18. He J.C., Marcos S., Burns S.A. Comparison of cone directionality determined by psychophysical and reflectometric techniques. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16:1999;2363-2369.
19. Marcos S., Burns S.A. On the symmetry between eyes of wavefront aberration and cone directionality. Vision Research. 40:2000;2437-2447.
20. McMahon M.J., MacLeod D.I.A. Retinal contrast losses and visual resolution with obliquely incident light. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 18:2001;2692-2703.
21. Mino M., Okano Y. Improvement in the OTF of a defocussed optical system through the use of shaded apertures. Applied Optics. 10:1971;2219-2225.
22. Navarro R., Moreno E., Dorronsoro C. Monochromatic aberrations and point-spread functions of the human eye across the visual field. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 18:1998;2522-2529.
23. Scott D.H., Atchison D.A., Pejski P.A. Description of a method for neutralising the Stiles-Crawford effect. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 21:2001;161-176.
24. Smallman H.S., MacLeod D.I., Doyle P. Realignment of cones after cataract removal. Nature. 412:2001;604-605.
25. Stiles W.S., Crawford B.H. The luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 112:1933;428-450.
26. Strang N., Atchison D.A., Woods R.L. Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 19:1999;415-426.
27. Westheimer G. Retinal light distribution for circular apertures in Maxwellian View. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 49:1959;41-44.
28. Zhang X., Ye M., Bradley A., Thibos L. Apodization by the Stiles-Crawford effect moderates the visual impact of retinal image defocus. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16:1999;812-820.