The need for comprehensive evaluation in science education

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 603-616

  Kumar, David D ^a   Altschuld, James W ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION;

EID: 0347900406     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1541-1338.2003.00041.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Altschuld, J. W. (1994). Evaluating the use of computers in science assessment: Considerations and recommendations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(1), 57-64.
2. Altschuld, J. W., & Kumar, D. D. (1995). Program evaluation in science education: The model perspective. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 65, 5-17.
3. Altschuld, J. W., & Kumar, D. D. (2000). What does the future have in store for the evaluation of science and technology education? In J. W. Altschuld & D. D. Kumar (Eds.), Evaluation of science and technology education at the dawn of a new millennium. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
4. Anderson, B. (2002). Evaluating systematic reform: Evaluating needs, practices, and challenge. In J. W. Altschuld & D. D. Kumar (Eds.), Evaluating of science and technology education at the dawn of a new millennium. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
5. Barron, L. C., Joesten, M. D., Goldman, E. S., Hofwolt, C. A., Bibring, J. B., Holladay, W. G., & Sherwood, R. D. (1993). Improving science education: A collaborative approach to the preparation of elementary school teachers. A final report to the National Science Foundation under grant number TPE-8950310. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
6. Cannon, J. R. (2002). Distance learning in science education: Practices and evaluation. In J. W. Altschuld & D. D. Kumar (Eds.), Evaluation of science and technology education at the dawn of a new millennium. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
7. Cullen, C., Denning, R., Haury, D., Herrera, T., Klapper, M., Lysaght, R., & Timko, G. (1997). Case studies: Teacher's perspective on reform and sources of information Technical report from the Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics and Science Education. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
8. Kliszus, E. A. (2002). Politics and educational policy: A school survival kit. Educational Horizon, 80(4), 166-168.
9. Kumar, D. D., & Altschuld, J. W. (1999). Evaluation of interactive media in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 55-66.
10. Kumar, D. D., & Altschuld, J. W. (2002). Complementary approaches to evaluation of technology in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 179-191.
11. US Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995, April). Teachers and technology: Making the connection, OTA-EHR-616. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
12. Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon research.