Adjoints of Nonoscillatory Advection Schemes

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 171, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 616-631

  Thuburn, John ^a   Haine, Thomas W N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjoint; Advection; Nonoscillatory

Indexed keywords

TIME SWITCHES;

ADJOINTS; ADVECTION EQUATIONS; NONOSCILLATORY; NUMERICAL SCHEME; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; ONE-DIMENSIONAL; PROPERTY; SIMPLE++; TEST CASE; TIME STEP;

ADVECTION;

EID: 0347770685     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6799     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bermejo R., Staniforth A. The conversion of semi-lagrangian advection schemes to quasi-monotone schemes. Mon. Weather Rev. 120:1992;2622.
2. C. Bischof, Automatic differentiation, tangent linear models, and pseudo-adjoints, in High-Performance Computing in the Geosciences, Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, edited by F.-X. Le DimetKluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Norwell, MA, 1994, pp. 59-80.
3. Bleck R., Boudra D. Wind-driven spin-up in eddy-resolving ocean models formulated in isopycnic and isobaric coordinates. J. Geophys. Res. 91C:1986;7611.
4. Boris J. P., Book D. L. Flux Corrected Transport. I. SHASTA, a fluid transport algorithm that works. J. Comput. Phys. 11:1972;38.
5. Durran D. R. Numerical Methods for Wave Equations in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. 1999.
6. Errico R. M. What is an adjoint model? Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 78:1997;2577.
7. Farrel B. F., Ioannou P. J. Generalized stability theory. Part I: Autonomous operators. J. Atmos. Sci. 53:1996;2025.
8. Fisher M., Lary D. J. Lagrangian 4-dimensional variational data assimilation of chemical-species. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 121:1995;1681.
9. Gelaro R., Buizza R., Palmer T. N., Klinker E. Sensitivity analysis of forecast errors and the construction of optimal perturbations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci. 55:1998;1012.
10. Giering R., Kaminski T. Recipes for adjoint code construction. Assoc. Comput. Mach., Trans. Math. Software. 24:1998;437.
11. Godunov S. K. Finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics (in Russian). Mat. Sb. 47:1959;271.
12. Griffith A. K. Data Assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction Using Control Theory. 1997.
13. Langland R. H., Elsberry R. L., Errico R. M. Evaluation of physical processes in an idealized extratropical cyclone using adjoint sensitivity. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 121:1995;1349.
14. Lawless A. S., Nichols N. K. A Comparison of Two Methods of Deriving the Tangent Linear Model. 1998.
15. Lea D. J., Allen M. R., Haine T. W. N. Sensitivity analysis of the climate of a chaotic system. Tellus. 52A:2000;523.
16. Leonard B. P. A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 19:1979;59.
17. Leonard B. P. The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 88:1991;17.
18. LeVeque R. J. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. 1992.
19. van Oldenburgh G. J., Burgers G., Venzke S., Eckert C., Giering R. Tracking down the ENSO-delayed oscillator with an adjoint OGCM. Mon. Weather Rev. 127:1999;1477.
20. Palmer T. N., Gelaro R., Barkmeijer J., Buizza R. Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci. 55:1998;633.
21. Polavarapu S., Tanguay M., Ménard R., Staniforth A. The tangent linear model for semi-Lagrangian schemes: linearizing the process of interpolation. Tellus. 48A:1996;74.
22. de Pondeca M. S. F. V., Barcilon A., Zou X. L. A adjoint sensitivity study of the efficacy of modal and nonmodal perturbations in causing model block onset. J. Atmos. Sci. 55:1998;2095.
23. Sirkes Z., Tziperman E. Finite difference of adjoint or adjoint of finite difference? Mon. Weather Rev. 125:1997;3373.
24. Smolarkiewicz P. K. Mon. Weather Rev. 117:1989;2626.
25. Thépaut J. N., Courtier P. Four-dimensional data assimilation using the adjoint of a multilevel primitive equation model. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 117:1991;1225.
26. Thuburn J., McIntyre M. E. Numerical advection schemes, cross-isentropic random walks, and correlations between chemical species. J. Geophys. Res. 102:1997;677.
27. Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II: Montonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 14:1974;361.
28. Vukićević T., Raeder K. Use of an adjoint model for finding triggers for alpine lee cyclogenesis. Mon. Weather Rev. 123:1995;800.
29. Vukićević T., Steyskal M., Hecht M. Properties of advection algorithms in the context of variational data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev. 129:2001;1221.
30. Williamson D. L., Rasch P. Two-dimensional semi-Lagrangian transport with shape-preserving interpolation. Mon. Weather Rev. 117:1989;102.
31. Xu Q. Generalized adjoint for physical processes with parameterized discontinuities. Part I: Basic issues and heuristic examples. J. Atmos. Sci. 53:1996;1123.
32. Zalesak S. T. Fully multidimensional flux corrected transport algorithms for fluids. J. Comput. Phys. 31:1979;335.
33. Zou X., Navon I. M., Sela J. G. Variational data assimilation with moist threshold processes using the NMC spectral model. Tellus. 45A:1993;370.
34. Zupanski D. A general weak constraint applicable to operational 4DVAR data assimilation systems. Mon. Weather Rev. 125:1997;2274.