Endogenous learning in European post-Kyoto scenarios: Results from applying the market equilibrium model PRIMES

International Journal of Global Energy Issues

Volumn 14, Issue 1-4, 2000, Pages 249-261

  Capros, Pantelis ^a,b,c   Mantzos, Leonidas ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

CO2 emission reduction to 2030; Endogenous technical change; Learning by doing; Marginal abatement costs; Value of technology change

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347685906     PISSN: 09547118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijgei.2000.004427     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Capros, P. and Mantzos, L. (2000) 'European Union post-Kyoto scenarios: benefits from accelerated technology progress', Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 204-221.
2. Capros, P. et al. (1998) The PRIMES energy system model - reference mannal, National Technical University of Athens, document as peer reviewed by the European Commission, Directorate General for Research.
3. Capros, P., Georgakopoulos, P., van Regemorter, D., Proost, S., Schmidt, T.F.N., Koschel, H., Conrad, K. and Vouyoukas, E.L. (1999) Climate technology strategies 2. The macro-economic cost and benefit of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
4. Capros, P., Mantzos, L., Criqui, P., Kouvaritakis, N., Soria, A., Schrattenholzer, L. and Vouyoukas, E.L. (1999) Climate technology strategies 1. Controlling greenhouse gases. Policy and technology options, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
5. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1989) 'Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D', The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, pp. 569-596.
6. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., (1990) 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 128-152.
7. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L., (Editors) (1988) Technical change and economic theory, Pinter Publishers, London and New York.
8. European Commission (1995) The PRIMES project, DG-XI, publication of the European Commission, EUR 16713 EN, August.
9. Freeman, C. (1994) 'The economics of technical change', Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 463-514.
10. Grübler, A. (1998) Technology and global change, International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
11. Kouvaritakis, N., Criqui, P. and Thonet, C. (2000) 'World post Kyoto scenarios: benefits from accelerated technology progress, Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 184-203.
12. Kouvaritakis, N., Soria, A. and Isoard, S. (2000) 'Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations model with learning by doing and learning by searching', Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 104-115.
13. Kouvaritakis, N., Soria, A., Isoard, S. and Thonet, C. (2000) 'Endogenous learning in world post Kyoto scenarios: application of the POLES model under adaptive expectations', Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 222-248.
14. Lemarie, S. (1995) Rationalité des choix en R&D dans le cadre de la théorie évolutionniste: une application à l'industrie des semences, Ph.D., University of Social Sciences Grenoble 2.
15. Mattsson, N. (1997) 'Internalising technological development in energy systems models', Thesis for the degree of licentiate of engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
16. Mattsson, N. (1998) 'GENIE: an energy system model with uncertain learning', Proceedings of the IEA/ETSAP 5th Workshop, Berlin, Germany, 6-7 May.
17. Messner, S. (1997) 'Endogenised technological learning in an energy systems model', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 7, pp. 291-313.
18. Messner, S. (1998) 'IIASA Maquette model prototype on endogenized technological learning', mimeo available from the author, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
19. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, (1997) Technology and the economy-the key relationships, TEP, the Technology/Economy Programme, OECD, Paris, France.
21. Rosenberg, N. (1976) 'On technological expectations', The Economic Journal, Vol. 86, pp. 523-535.
22. Rosenberg, N. (1982) Inside the Black Box, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
23. Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper, New York.
24. Smiley, R.H. and Ravid, S.A. (1983) 'The importance of being first: learning price and strategy', The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 353-362.
25. Stadler, M. (1991) 'R&D dynamics in the product life cycle', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 293-305.
26. Stiglitz, J. (1987) 'The economics of learning by learning', in Dasgupta P. and Stoneman, P. (Editors) Economic policy and technological performance, Cambridge University Press.