European Union post-Kyoto scenarios: Benefits from accelerated technology progress

International Journal of Global Energy Issues

Volumn 14, Issue 1-4, 2000, Pages 204-221

  Capros, Pantelis ^a,b,c   Mantzos, Leonidas ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

CO2 emission reduction to 2030; European Union; Marginal abatement costs; Power generation technologies; Technological breakthrough; Value of technology change

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346300490     PISSN: 09547118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijgei.2000.004354     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kouvaritakis, N., Criqui, P. and Thonet, C. (2000) 'World post-Kyoto scenarios: benefits from accelerated technology progress', Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 184-203.
2. 1990
3. The difference between the PRIMES model and the permit price resulting from the POLES model led to a redefinition of carbon values (permit prices) used in PRIMES. For a more detailed discussion of the issue, see also [6].
4. Capros, P. and Mantzos, L. (2000) 'The European energy outlook to 2010 and 2030', Int. J. Global Energy Issues. Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 137-154.
5. Capros, P. and Mantzos, L. (2000) 'Kyoto and technology at the European Union: costs of emission reduction under flexibility mechanisms and technology progress', Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 169-183.
6. 2 emissions: analysis for EU sectors and member-states by using the PRIMES ver.2 energy system model, final report to Directorate General for Environment (DG-XI) of the European Commission.
7. Capros, P. et al. (1998) The PRIMES energy system model - reference manual, National Technical University of Athens, document as peer reviewed by the European Commission, Directorate General for Research.
8. Capros, P., Mantzos, L., Criqui, P., Kouvaritakis, N., Soria, A., Schrattenholzer, L. and Vouyoukas, E.L. (1999) Climate technology strategies 1. Controlling greenhouse gases. Policy and technology options, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
9. Capros, P., Georgakopoulos, P., van Regemorter, D., Proost, S., Schmidt, T.F.N., Koschel, H., Conrad, K. and Vouyoukas, E.L. (1999) Climate technology strategies 2. The macro-economic cost and benefit of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
10. 2 emission trends to 2020', The Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, Vol. 19, No. 6, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
11. Capros, P. et al. (1999) 'European Union energy outlook to 2020', European Commission, Directorate General for Energy DG-XVII, special issue of Energy in Europe, catalogue number CS-24-99-130-EN-C, ISBN 92-828-7533-4.
12. Criqui, P., Cattier, F., Kouvaritakis, N. and Thonet, C. (1998) Technological scenarios, climate change and emission trading: EC-IEA study on energy technology and climate change simulations using the POLES world model, IPTS, Seville.
13. 2 reduction under flexibility mechanisms and technical progress', Int. J. Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Nos. 1-4, pp. 155-168.
14. 2 emission trading', MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 41, Cambridge, MA.
15. European Commission (1995) The PRIMES project, DG-XI, publication of the European Commission, EUR 16713 EN, August.
16. US Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy, (1998) Scenario of US carbon reductions-potential impacts of energy-efficient and low-carbon technologies by 2010 and beyond, Five Labs study.
17. 2 emissions, a survey and analysis', Annual Review of Energy and Environment 18.
18. Parry, I.W.H. (1997a) 'Pollution regulation and the efficiency gains from technological innovation', Resources for the future. Discussion paper 98-04, Washington, DC.
19. US Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy, (1997) Technology opportunities to reduce GHGs, October
20. US Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy, (1998) Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on US energy markets and economic activity, October.
21. 2 emissions, ECN, December.