Structural Contingencies and Object-Based Shifts of Attention during Object Recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 780-807

  Sanocki, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031513713     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.780     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451-470.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
4. Biederman, I., Teitelbaum, R. C., & Mezzanotte, R. J. (1983). Scene perception: A failure to find a benefit from prior expectancy or familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 411-429.
5. Boucart, M., Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1995). Three-dimensional features facilitate object recognition. Visual Cognition, 2, 451-478.
6. Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11, 459-474.
7. Dickinson, S. J., Bergevin, R., Biederman, I., Eklundh, J., Munck-Fairwood, R., & Pentland, A. (in press). The use of geons for generic 3-D object recognition. Image and Vision Computing.
8. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
9. Earhard, B. (1990). The generality of outside-in processing routines in the analysis of form. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 14-29.
10. Earhard,. B., & Walker, H. (1985). An "outside-in" processing strategy in the perception of form. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 249-260.
11. Enns, J. T., & Prinzmetal, W. (1984). The role of redundancy in the object-line effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 22-32.
12. Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 299-305.
13. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
14. Henderson, J. M., & Anes, M. D. (1994). Roles of object-file preview and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 826-839.
15. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 196-208.
16. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
17. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
18. Humphreys, G. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Priming effects between two-dimensional shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 203-220.
19. Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420-456.
20. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasurman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object-files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
22. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/ local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
23. Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: "Top-down," "bottom-up" or "middle-out." Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 225-231.
24. Kurbat, M. A. (1994). Structural description theories: Is RBC/JIM a general-purpose theory of human entry-level recognition? Perception, 23, 1339-1368.
25. Ling, X., & Sanocki, T. (1995). Major axes as a moderately abstract model for object recognition. Psychological Science, 6, 370-375.
26. Lowe, D. G. (1985). Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Boston: Kluwer.
27. Lupker, S. J. (1979). On the nature of perceptual information during letter perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 303-312.
28. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
29. McClelland, J. L., & Miller, J. (1979). Structural factors in figure perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 221-229.
30. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
31. Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 1-32.
32. Neely, J. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
33. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
34. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1976). On the role of active memory processes in perception and cognition. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory (pp. 114-132). San Francisco: Freeman.
35. Oden, G. C. (1979). A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 336-352.
36. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
37. Palmer, S. E. (1975). Visual perception and knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 279-307). San Francisco: Freeman.
38. Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441-474.
39. Pinker, S. (1984). Visual cognition: An introduction. Cognition, 18, 1-63.
40. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442.
41. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 199-210.
42. Pomerantz, J. R., & Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 635-649.
43. Posner, M. I. (1980). The orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
44. Quinlan, P. T. (1991). Differing approaches to two-dimensional shape recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 224-241.
45. Rensink, R. A. (1990). Toolbox-based routines for Macintosh timing and display. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 105-117.
46. Sanocki, T. (1991). Effects of early common features on form recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 490-497.
47. Sanocki, T. (1993). Time course of object recognition: Evidence for a global-to-local contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 878-898.
48. Sanocki, T., Bowyer, K., Adair, J., & Sarkar, S. (1995). Are real edges sufficient for object recognition? Investigative opthamology & visual science [Abstract], 36, 3890.
49. Sanocki, T., & Oden, G. C. (1991). Perceptual adjustments on representations of familiar patterns: Change over time and relational features. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 28-44.
50. Sanocki, T., & Sellers, E. (1996). Shifting resources to recognize an object: Dependencies involving initial stimulus information. Unpublished manuscript.
51. Treisman, A., & Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention, and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-31.
52. Tsal, Y., Meiran, N., & Lamy, D. (1995). Toward a resolution theory of visual attention. Visual Cognition, 2, 313-331.
53. Tsotsos, J. K. (1990). Analyzing vision at the complexity level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 423-469.
54. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
55. von Helmholtz, H. (1867). Treatise on physiological optics (Vol. III). New York: Dover.
56. Waltz, D. (1975). Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 19-92). New York: McGraw-Hill.
57. Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global levels of visual forms. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562-581.
58. Witkin, A. P., & Tenenbaum, J. M. (1983). On the role of structure in vision. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and maching vision (pp. 481-543). New York: Academic Press.
59. Woodard, C., & Sanocki, T. (1995). What information in common feature primes facilitates pattern recognition? Unpublished manuscript.
60. Yantis, S. (1995). Attentional capture in vision. In M. Coles, G. Logan, & A. Kramer (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
61. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.