The need for crossing the method boundaries in economics research

Feminist Economics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 121-125

  Berik, Günseli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Data gathering techniques; Feminist economics; Feminist research; Fieldwork; Qualitative methods; Survey method

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031515315     PISSN: 13545701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135457097338735     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anker, Richard, M. E. Khan and Raj Behari Gupta. 1988. Women's Participation in the Labor Force: A Methods Test in India for Improving its Measurement. Women, Work and Development Series, No. 16, Geneva: International Labour Office.
2. Ayres, Ian and Peter Siegelman. 1995. "Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car." American Economic Review 85(3): 304-21.
3. Badgett, M. V. Lee. 1995. "Affirmative Action in a Changing Legal and Economic Environment." Industrial Relations 34(4): 489-506.
4. Bardhan, Pranab (ed.). 1989. Conversations between Economists and Anthropologists: Methodological Issues in Measuring Economic Change in Rural India. New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Benería, Lourdes. 1992. "Accounting for Women's Work: The Progress of Two Decades." World Development 2(11): 1547-60.
6. Deere, Carmen Diana. 1982. "The Division of Labor by Sex in Agriculture: A Peruvian Case Study." Economic Development and Cultural Change 30(2): 795-811.
7. Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.). 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Elson, Diane. 1995. "Household Responses to Stabilization and Structural Adjustment: Male Bias at the Micro Level," in Diane Elson (ed.) Male Bias in the Development Process, pp. 211-52. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
9. Harding, Sandra. 1987. "Introduction: Is There A Feminist Method?" in Sandra Harding (ed.) Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, pp. 1-14. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; and Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
10. Jayaratne, Toby Epstein and Abigail J. Stewart. 1991. "Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Social Sciences: Current Feminist Issues and Practical Strategies," in Mary Margaret Fonow and Judith A. Cook (eds.) Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, pp. 85-106. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
11. Reinharz, Shulamit. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Sivakumar, S. S. 1986. "Is the Method All Madness? Comments from a Participant Observer Economist." Social Research 53(4): 615-46.
13. Sprague, Joey and Mary K. Zimmerman. 1993. "Overcoming Dualisms: A Feminist Agenda for Sociological Methodology," in Paula England (ed.) Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory, pp. 255-80. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.