Effect of composition and complexity of dentin-bonding agents on operator variability - Analysis of gap formation using confocal microscopy

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 111, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 523-528

  Jacobsen, Thomas ^a,e   Söderholm, Karl Johan M ^b   Yang, Mark ^c   Watson, Timothy F ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c London University ^*  (United States)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acid etching; Adhesives chemistry; Clinical competence; Dental; Dental bonding; Dentin bonding agents chemistry

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; DENTISTRY; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; OPERATOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0347624377     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00076.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. NAKABAYASHI N, KOJIMA K, MASUHARA E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mat Res 1982; 16: 265-273.
2. VAN MEERBEEK B, INOKOSHI S, BRAEM M, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1530-1540.
3. GWINNETT AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 127-129.
4. KANCA JA. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quint Int 1992; 23: 39-41.
5. HASHIMOTO M, OHNO H, KAGA M, SANO H, ENDO K, OGUCHI H. The extent to which resin can infiltrate dentin by acetone-based adhesives. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 74-78.
6. GWINNETT AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 144-148.
7. JACOBSEN T, SÖDERHOLM K-JM. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation, and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 225-228.
8. VAN MEERBEEK B, YOSHIDA Y, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G, DUKE ES, EICK JD, ROBINSON SJ. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 50-59.
9. MIYAZAKI M, PLATT JA, ONOSE H, MOORE BK. Influence of dentin primer application methods on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 167-172.
10. JACOBSEN T, SÖDERHOLM K-JM. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 132-136.
11. TAY FR, GWINNETT AJ, WEI SH. The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of the surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 161-166.
12. SPENCER P, WANG Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 62: 447-456.
13. HILTON TJ, SCHWARTZ RS. The effect of air thinning on dentin adhesive bond strength. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 133-137.
14. KEMP-SCHOLTE CM, DAVIDSON CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
15. KEMP-SCHOLTE CM, DAVIDSON CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 658-664.
16. CHOI KK, CONDON JR, FERRACANE JL. The effect of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composites. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 812-817.
17. FREY O. Creating a reliable bond. An all-in-one system. Am J Dent 2000; 13(Spec Iss): 85D-87D.
18. BOUILLAGUET S, GYSI P, WATAHA JC, CIUCCHI B, CATTANI M, GODIN C, MEYER JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001; 29: 55-61.
19. DUNN WJ, SÖDERHOLM KJ. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 297-303.
20. INOUE S, VARGAS MA, ABE Y, YOSHIDA Y, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G, SANO H, VAN MEERBEEK B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 237-245.
21. PASHLEY DH, TAY FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II. etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 430-444.
22. TAY FR, PASHLEY DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I. Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 296-308.
23. BRACKETT WW, COVEY DA, ST GERMAIN HA. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 218-222.
24. HANSEN EK. Visible light-cured composite resins: polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90: 329-335.
25. HANSEN EK, ASMUSSEN E. Effect of postponed polishing on marginal adaptation of resin used with dentin-bonding agent. Scand J Dent Res 1988; 96: 260-264.
26. JÖRGENSEN KD, ITOH K, MUNKSGAARD EC, ASMUSSEN E. Composite wall-to-wall polymerization contraction in dentin cavities treated with various bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 276-279.
27. WATSON TF. Fact and artefact in confocal microscopy. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11: 433-441.
28. SANO H, KANEMURA N, BURROW MF, INAI N, YAMADA T, TAGAMI J. Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs. dentists. Dent Mater J 1998; 17: 51-58.
29. FINGER WJ, BALKENHOL M. Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 311-314.
30. MIYAZAKI M, ONOSE H, MOORE BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 101-104.
31. BOUILLAGUET S, DEGRANGE M, CATTANI M, GODIN C, MEYER JM. Bonding to dentin achieved by general practitioners. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2002; 112: 1006-1011.
32. FRANKENBERGER R, KRÄMER N, PETSCHEET A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 324-330.
33. PEUTZFELDT A, ASMUSSEN E. Adhesive systems: effect of bond strength of incorrect use. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 233-242.
34. PEUTZFELDT A, VIGILD M. A survey of the use of dentin-bonding systems in Denmark. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 211-216.
35. PERDIGÃO J, LAMBRECHTS P, VAN MEERBEEK B, BRAEM M, YILDIZ E, YUCEL T, VANHERLE G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 167-173.
36. TAM LE, PILLIAR RM. Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 953-959.
37. TITLEY K, CHERNECKY R, MARIC B, SMITH D. Penetration of a dentin bonding agent into dentin. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 190-194.
38. PASHLEY DH, CIUCCHI B, SANO H, HORNER JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive resins. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 618-631.
39. PERDIGÃO J, LAMBRECHTS P, VAN MEERBEEK B, VANHERLE G, LOPES AB. Field emission SEM comparison of four post-fixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1111-1120.
40. OKAMOTO Y, HEELEY JD, DOGON IL, SHINTANI H. Effects of phosphoric acid and tannic acid on dentine collagen. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18: 507-512.
41. WANG Y, SPENCER P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 141-145.
42. HANSEN EK, LANGENVAD G. Influence of irradiation time on effect of a light-activated dentin-bonding agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1987; 45: 347-351.