Chapter 2: Conceptual Basis for Designing an Effectiveness Monitoring Program

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn , Issue PNW-GTR-437, 1999, Pages 21-48

  Noon, Barry R ^a   Spies, Thomas A ^a   Raphael, Martin G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347608639     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen, T.F.H.; Hoekstra, T.W. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Allen, T.F.H.; Starr, T.B. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Barber, M.C., ed. 1994. Environmental monitoring and assessment program indicator development strategy. EPA/620/R-94/022. Athens, GA: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratory.
4. Bisson, P.A.; Reeves, G.H.; Bilby, R.E.; Naiman, R.J. 1997. Watershed management and desired future conditions. In: Stouder, D.J.; Bisson, P.A.; Naiman, R.J., eds. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems: status and future options. New York: Chapman and Hall: 447-474.
5. Chapin, F.S., III; Torn, M.S.; Tateno, M. 1996. Principles of ecosystem sustainability. American Naturalist. 148: 1016-1037.
6. Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.
7. Conroy, M.J.; Noon, B.R. 1996. Mapping of species richness as a tool for the conservation of biological diversity: conceptual and methodological issues. Ecological Applications. 6: 763-773.
8. DelCourt, H.R.; DelCourt, P.A.; Webb, T. 1983. Dynamic plant ecology: the spectrum of vegetational change in space and time. Quaternary Science Review. 1: 153-175.
9. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program [EMAP]. 1993. Environmental monitoring and assessment program: master glossary. EPA/620/R-93/013. Research Triangle Park, NC: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
10. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team [FEMAT]. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of the Interior [and others]. [Irregular pagination].
11. Goldsmith, F.B., ed. 1991. Monitoring for conservation and ecology. New York: Chapman and Hall.
12. Hemstrom, M.; Spies, T.; Palmer, C. [and others]. [In press]. Late-successional and old-growth forest effectiveness monitoring plan for the Northwest Forest Plan. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-438. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 37 p.
13. Hunsaker, C.T.; Carpenter, D.E., eds. 1990. Environmental monitoring and assessment program: ecological indicators. EPA/600/3-90/060, BP91-14196. Research Triangle Park, NC: Environmental Protection Agency.
14. Jones, C.G.; Lawton, J.H., eds. 1994. Linking species and ecosystems. New York: Chapman and Hall. 387 p.
15. Karr, J.R. 1987. Biological monitoring and environmental assessment: a conceptual framework. Environmental Management. 11: 249-256.
16. Karr, J.R. 1991. Biological integrity: a long neglected aspect of water resources management. Ecological Applications. 1: 66-84.
17. Karr, J.R. 1996. Ecological integrity and ecological health are not the same. In: Shultz, P.C., ed. Engineering within ecological constraints. Washington, DC: National Academy Press: 97-109.
18. Lamberson, R.H.; McKelvey, R; Noon, B.R.; Voss, C. 1992. A dynamic analysis of northern spotted owl viability in a fragmented forest landscape. Conservation Biology. 6: 505-512.
19. Lande, R. 1987. Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. American Naturalist. 130: 624-635.
20. Larsen, D.P.; Thorton, K.W.; Urquhart, N.S.; Paulsen, S.G. 1994. The role of sample surveys for monitoring the condition of the nation's lakes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 32: 101-134.
21. Lindley, D.V. 1985. Making decisions. New York: Wiley.
22. Maguire, L.A.; Boiney, L.G. 1994. Resolving environmental disputes: a framework incorporating decision analysis and dispute resolution techniques. Journal of Environmental Management. 42: 31-48.
23. Maguire, L.A.; Clark, T.W.; Crete, R. [and others]. 1988. Black-footed ferret recovery in Montana: a decision analysis. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 16: 111-120.
24. Morrison, M.L.; Marcot, B.C. 1995. An evaluation of resource inventory and monitoring program used in National Forest Planning. Environmental Management. 19: 147-156.
25. National Research Council [NRC]. 1990. Managing troubled waters: role of marine environmental monitoring. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. National Research Council [NRC]. 1994a. Review of EPA's environmental monitoring and assessment program: forests and estuaries. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. National Research Council [NRC]. 1994b. Review of EPA's environmental monitoring and assessment program: surface waters. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. National Research Council [NRC]. 1995. Review of EPA's environmental monitoring and assessment program: overall evaluation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Nichols, J.D.; Johnson, F.A.; Williams, B.K. 1995. Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annual Reviews Ecology and Systematics. 26: 177-199.
30. Noss, R. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity - a hierarchial approach. Conservation Biology. 4: 355-364.
31. Opdam, P.; Van Apeldoorn, R.; Schotman, A.; Kalkhoven, J. 1993. Population responses to landscape fragmentation. In: Vos, C.C.; Opdam, P., eds. Landscape ecology of a stressed environment. London: Chapman and Hall: 147-171.
32. Overton, W.S.; Stehman, S.V. 1995. Design implications of anticipated data uses for comprehensive environmental monitoring programs. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 2(4): 287-303.
33. Peterman, R.M. 1990. Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 47: 2-15.
34. Pickett, S.T.A.; Parker, V.T.; Fiedler, P.T. 1992. The new paradigm in ecology: implications for conservation biology above the species level. In: Fiedler, P.L.; Jain, S.K., eds. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. New York: Chapman and Hall: 65-88.
35. Rapport, D.U.; Reiger, H.A. 1995. Disturbance and stress effects on ecological systems. In: Patten, B.C.; Jorgensen, S.E., eds. Complex ecology: the part-whole relation in ecosystems. [City unknown], NJ: Prentice Hall: 397-414.
36. Reeves, G.H.; Benda, L.E.; Burnett, K.M. [and others]. 1995. A disturbance-based ecosystem approach to maintaining and restoring freshwater habitats of evolutionary significant units of anadromous salmonids in the Pacific Northwest. American Fisheries Society Symposium. 17: 334-349.
37. Sauer, J.R.; Droege, S. 1990. Survey designs and statistical methods for the estimation of avian population trends. Biol. Rep. 90(1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 166 p.
38. Schmitt, R.J.; Osenberg, C.W., eds. 1996. Detecting ecological impacts: concepts and applications in coastal habitats. New York: Academic Press.
39. Skalski, J.R. 1995. Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of environmental damage assessment studies. Journal of Environmental Management. 43: 67-85.
40. Smith, G.R. 1997. Making decisions in a complex and dynamic world. In: Kohn, K.A.; Franklin, J.F., eds. Creating a forestry for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Island Press.
41. Spies, T.A. 1991. Plant species diversity and occurrence in young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir stands in western Washington and Oregon. In: Ruggiero, L.F.; Aubry, K.B.; Carey, A.B.; Huff, M.H., eds. Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-285. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
42. Spies, T.A.; Franklin, J.F. 1991. The structural of natural, young, mature, and old-growth forest in Washington and Oregon. In: Ruggiero, L.F.; Aubry, K.B.; Carey, A.B.; Huff, M.H., eds. Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-285. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
43. Spies, T.A.; Franklin, J.F. 1995. The diversity and maintenance of old-growth forests. In: Szaro, R.C.; Johnson, D.W., eds. Biodiversity in managed landscapes. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Stevens, D.L. 1994. Implementation of a national environmental monitoring program. Journal of Environmental Management. 42: 1-29.
45. Stewart-Oaten, A. 1996. Problems in the analysis of environmental monitoring data. In: Schmitt, R.J.; Osenberg, G.W., eds. Detecting ecological impacts: concepts and applications in coastal habitats. New York: Academic Press: 109-132.
46. Suter, G.W. 1993. Ecological risk assessment. [Place of publication unknown]: Lewis Publishers.
47. Thornton, K.W.; Saul, G.E.; Hyatt, D.E. 1994. Environmental monitoring and assessment program assessment framework. EPA/620/R-94/016: Research Triangle Park, NC: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, Research and Assessment Center.
48. Ulrich, B. 1994. Process hierarchy in forest ecosystems: an integrative ecosystem theory. In: Godbold, D.L.; Huttermann, A., eds. Effects of acid rain on forest processes. New York: Wiley: 353-397.
49. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management [USDA and USDI]. 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl. [Place of publication unknown]. 74 p.
50. U.S. General Accounting Office [U.S. GAO]. 1988. Environmental Protection Agency: protecting human health and the environment. GAO/RCED-880-101. Washington, DC.
51. Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2d ed. [City unknown], NJ: Prentice-Hall.
52. Zielinski, W.J.; Stauffer, H.B. 1996. Monitoring Martes populations in California: survey design and power analysis. Ecological Applications. 6: 1254-1267.