Contributions of Semantic and Facial Information to Perception of Nonsibilant Fricatives

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1367-1377

  Jongman, Allard ^a   Wang, Yue ^b,c   Kim, Brian H ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Facial context; Fricatives; Perception; Semantic context

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NONSIBILANT FRICATIVE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; RELIABILITY; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOICE; VOWEL;

ADULT; CUES; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0347586939     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/106)     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Balise, R. R., & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Some distributional facts about fricatives and a perceptual explanation. Phonetica, 51, 99-110.
2. Benguerel, A.P., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (1982). Coarticulation effects in lip reading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 600-607.
3. Binnie, C. A., Montgomery, A. A., & Jackson, P. L. (1974). Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 619-630.
4. Campbell, R., Dodd, B., & Burnham, D. (1998.). Hearing by eye: II. Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech. East Sussex, U.K.: Psychology Press.
5. Charles-Luce, J. (1993). The effects of semantic context on voicing neutralization. Phonetica, 50, 28-44.
6. Cole, R. A. (1973). Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 153-156.
7. Connine, C. M. (1987). Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 16, 527-538.
8. De Filippo, C. L., & Sims, D. G. (1988). New reflections on speechreading [edited monograph]. The Volta Review, 90, 3-313.
9. Fisher, C. G. (1968). Confusions among visually perceived consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 796-804.
10. Garnes, S., & Bond, Z. S. (1976). The relationship between semantic expectation and acoustic information. Phonologica, 3, 285-293.
11. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
12. Harris, K. S. (1958). Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech, 1, 1-7.
13. Jongman, A. (1989). Duration of fricative noise required for identification of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1718-1725.
14. Jongman, A., & Wang, Y. (2002). Perceptual characteristics of English fricatives. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252-1263.
16. Kricos, P. B., & Lesner, S. A. (1982). Differences in visual intelligibility across talkers. The Volta Review, 84, 219-225.
17. LaRiviere, C., Winitz, H., & Herriman, E. (1975). The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 613-622.
18. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244, 522-523.
19. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
20. Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 558-614.
23. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
24. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
25. Mertus, J. (1989). Bliss manual. Providence, RI: Brown University.
26. Miller, G. A., & Isard, S. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 217-228.
27. Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
28. Miller, J. L., Green, K., & Schermer, T. (1984). A distinction between the effects of sentential speaking rate and semantic congruity on word identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 329-337.
29. Norris, D. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
30. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
31. Pisoni, D., & Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 285-290.
32. Pollack, I., & Pickett, J. M. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language and Speech, 6, 165-171.
33. Repp, B. H., Manuel, S. Y., Liberman, A. M., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1983). Exploring the McGurk effect [Abstract]. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 358.
34. Sawusch, J. R. (1996). Instrumentation and methodology for the study of speech perception. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Principles of experimental phonetics (pp. 525-550). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
35. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contributions to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
36. Tomiak, G. (1990). An acoustic and perceptual analysis of the spectral moments invariant with voiceless fricative obstruents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.
37. Walden, B., Prosek, R., Montgomery, A., Scherr, C., & Jones, C. (1977). Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 130-145.