The determination of the depth of magnetic anomaly sources

Archaeological Prospection

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 85-105

  Desvignes, Guy ^a   Tabbagh, Alain ^a   Benech, Christophe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Depth determination; Equivalent stratum; Euler deconvolution; Magnetic prospecting

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347577058     PISSN: 10752196     EISSN: 10990763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199906)6:2<85::AID-ARP119>3.0.CO;2-I     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersen, F. H. and Pedersen, L. B. (1979). Some relations between potential fields and the strength and center of their sources. Geophysical Prospecting 27(4): 761–774.
2. Banteaux, L., Hesse, A. and Jolivet, A. (1979). A new apparatus of differential recording of the magnetic field for archaeological prospecting. Nineteenth International Symposium on Archaeometry and Archaeological Prospection, London, 28–31 March 1979, Abstracts.
3. Bhattacharyya, B. K. (1978). Computer modeling in gravity and magnetic interpretation. Geophysics 43: 912–929.
4. Desvignes, G. and Tabbagh, A. (1995). Simultaneous interpretation of magnetic and electromagnetic prospecting for characterisation of magnetic features. Archaeological Prospection 2: 129–139.
5. Empereur, J. Y., Hesse, A. and Tuna, N. (in press). Les ateliers d’amphores de Datça, péninsule de Cnide. Actes du colloque ‘Production et commerce des amphores anciennes en mer noire’, Institut Français d’Etudes Anatoliennes, Istanbul, 25–28 May 1994.
6. Grant, F. S. and West, G. F. (1965). Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. New York: MacGraw Hill, 214–216.
7. Gun, P. J. (1975). Linear transformations of gravity and magnetic fields. Geophysical Prospecting 23: 300–312.
8. Helbig, K. (1963). Some integrals of magnetic anomalies and their relation to the parameters of the disturbing body. Zeitschrift für Geophysik 29: 83–96.
9. Hesse, A. (1966). Prospections géophysiques à faible profondeur—Applications à l’archéologie. Paris: Dunod.
10. Peters, L. J. (1949). The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application. Geophysics 14(3): 290–320.
11. Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., Granser, H., Millett, A. J. and Somerton, I. W. (1990). Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55(1): 80–91.
12. Smith, R. A. (1959). Some depth formulae for local magnetic and gravity anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 7: 55–63.
13. Tabbagh, A. (1974). Méthodes électromagnétiques de prospection applicables aux problèmes archéologiques. Archaeo-physika 5: 349–437.
14. Tabbagh, A., Desvignes, G. and Dabas, M. (1997). Processing of Z gradiometer magnetic data using linear transforms and analytic signal. Archaeological Prospection 4: 1–13.
15. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., Sheriff, R. E. and Keys, D. A. (1976). Applied Geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Thompson, D. T. (1982). EULDPH: a new technique for making computer assisted estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 41(1): 131–137.
17. ™ method. Geophysics 62: 807–813.
18. Tite, M. S. and Mullins, C. E. (1969). Electromagnetic prospecting: a preliminary investigation. Prospezione archeologiche 4: 95–102.