Performing automatic exams

Computers and Education

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 281-300

  Frosini, G ^a   Lazzerini, B ^a   Marcelloni, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347573161     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00042-6     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barrie, H. (1975). Introduzione alle Tecniche di Valutazione. Bologna: Zanichelli.
2. Berry, R. E., & Meekings, B. A. E. (1985). A style analysis of C programs. Communications of the ACM, 28(1), 80-88.
3. Gattullo, M. (1988). Didattica e Docimologia - Misurazione e Valutazione nella Scuola. Roma: Armando.
4. Gregory, K. (1996). Special Edition Using Visual C+ + 4.2. Que Corporation.
5. Hung, S., Kwok, L., & Chan, R. (1993). Automatic programming assessment. Computers and Education, 20(2), 183-190.
6. Jackson, D. (1991). Using software tools to automate the assessment of student programs. Computers and Education, 17(2), 133-143.
7. Jackson, D. (1996). A software system for grading student computer programs. Computers and Education, 27(3/4), 171-180.
8. Jensen, K. & Wirth, N. (1985). Pascal User Manual and Report. Third Edition. New York: Springer Verlag.
9. Lake, A., & Cook, C. (1990). STYLE: an automated program style analyser for Pascal. SIGCSE Bull., 22(3), 29-33.
10. Marca, D. (1981). Some Pascal style guidelines. SIGPLAN Notices, 16(4), 70-80.
11. McCabe, T. A. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308-320.
12. Ponsoda, V., Wise, S. L., Olea, J., & Revuelta, J. (1997). An investigation of self-adapted testing in a Spanish high school population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(2), 211-221.
13. Rees, M. J. (1982). Automatic assessment aids for Pascal programs. SIGPLAN Notices, 17, 33-42.
14. Rocklin, T. R. (1994). Self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(1), 3-14.
15. Rocklin, T. R., & O'Donnel, A. M. (1989). Self-adapted testing: a performance-improving variant of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315-319.
16. Sheppard, M. (1988). A critique of cyclomatic complexity as a software metric. IEE Software Engineering Journal, 3, 30-36.
17. Thoennessen, M., & Harrison, M. J. (1996). Computer-assisted assignments in a large physics class. Computers and Education, 27(2), 141-147.
18. Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., & Wang, T. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: a comparison of fixed-item, computerized-adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(1), 53-79.
19. Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 473-492.
20. Wilks, S. S. (1962). Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
21. Zadeh, L. A. (1973). Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(1), 28-44.