An investigation of self-adapted testing in a spanish high school population

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 210-221

  Ponsoda, Vicente ^b   Wise, Steven L ^a   Olea, Julio ^c   Revuelta, Javier ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031517747     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164497057002002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Assessments Systems Corporation. (1988). User's manual for the MicroCAT testing system. Version 3. St. Paul, MN: Author.
2. Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 147-200). New York: Macmillan.
3. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47-77.
4. Johnson, P. L., Roos, L. L., Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S. (1991). Correlates of examinee item choice behavior in self-adapted testing. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4(3), 25-28.
5. Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., & Revuelta, J. (1994). ADTEST: A computer-adaptive test based on the maximum information principle. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 680-686.
6. Rocklin, T. R. (1994). Self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 3-14.
7. Rocklin, T. R., & O'Donnell, A. M. (1987). Self-adapted testing: A performance-improving variant of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315-319.
8. Rocklin, T. R., & O'Donnell, A. M. (1991, April). An empirical comparison of self adapted and maximum information item selection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
9. Roos, L. L., Plake, B. S., & Wise, S. L. (1992, April). The effects of feedback in computerized adaptive and self-adapted tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco.
10. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (Spanish adaptation by TEA Ediciones SA [1988, 3rd ed.])
11. Virella, B., Arbona, C., & Novy, D. M. (1994). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Spanish version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 401-412.
12. Vispoel, W. P., & Coffman, D. D. (1994). Computer-adaptive and self-adaptive music listening tests: Psychometric features and motivational benefits. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 25-51.
13. Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T., & Wang, T. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computer-adaptive, and self-adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 53-79.
14. Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., de la Torre, R., Bleiler, T., & Dings, J. (1992, April). How review options and administration modes influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
15. Wise, S. L. (1994). Understanding self-adapted testing: The perceived control hypothesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 15-24.
16. Wise, S. L., Plake, B. S., Johnson, P. L., & Roos, L. L. (1992). A comparison of self-adapted and computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 329-339.