Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the city of london

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1187-1208

  Nachum, Lilach ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

City of London; Financial services; Global competition; Liability of foreignness

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; PLANT MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

FINANCIAL SERVICES; GLOBALIZATION; MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES (MNE);

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0347533002     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.347     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aiken LS, West SG. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage: London.
2. Augar P. 2001. The Death of Gentlemanly Capitalism: The Rise and Fall of London's Investment Banks. Penguin: London.
3. The Banker. 1998. Size does matter. June: 30-34.
4. Barber BM, Lyon JD. 1996. Detecting abnormal operating performance: the empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics 41: 359-399.
5. Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
6. Benston GJ. 1990. U.S. banking in an increasingly integrated and competitive world economy. Journal of Financial Services Research 4: 311-339.
7. Brealey RA, Kaplanis EC. 1996. The determination of foreign banking location. Journal of International Money and Finance 15(4): 577-597.
8. British Invisibles. 2000. International financial markets in the UK. City Business Series.
9. Budd L, Whimster S. 1992. Global Finance and Urban Living: A Study of Metropolitan Change. Routledge: London.
10. Caves RE. 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
11. Coakley J. 1992. London as an international financial centre. In Global Finance and Urban Living: A Study of Metropolitan Change, Budd L, Whimster S (eds). Routledge: London; 52-72.
12. Cobham D (ed). 1992. Markets and Dealers: The Economics of the London Financial Markets. Longman: London.
13. Corporation of London. 2000. www.cityoflondon.gov.uk [September 2001].
14. Darlington L. 1998. Banking without boundaries: how the banking industry is transforming itself for the digital age. In Blueprint to the Digital Economy: Creating Wealth in the Era of E-Business, Tapscott D, Lowy A, Ticoll D (eds). McGraw-Hill: New York; 113-138.
15. Delios A, Beamish PW. 2001. Survival and profitability: the roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal 44(5): 1028-1038.
16. Demirguc-Kunt A, Huizinga H. 2001. The taxation of domestic and foreign banking. Journal of Public Economics 79(3): 429-453.
17. Dunning JH. 1979. Explaining changing patterns of international production: in defence of the eclectic theory. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 41(4): 34-48.
18. Dunning JH. 1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Addison-Wesley: Wokingham.
19. The Economist. 2000. Banks in trouble: the bigger they are. 28 October: 115-116, 121.
20. Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Building theories from case studies research. Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.
21. Financial Times. 2000. Performance relations: giving bigger and bigger incentives may create more problems. 26-27 August: 18.
22. Fund Managers' Association. 2000. Fund management survey. Report. London.
23. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis (4th edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24. Hawawini G, Schill M. 1994. The Japanese presence in the European financial services sector. In Does Ownership Matter? Japanese Multinationals in Europe, Mason M, Encarnation D (eds). Clarendon Press: Oxford; 235-292.
25. Hirtle B. 1991. Factors affecting the competitiveness of internationally active financial institutions. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review 16(1): 38-51.
26. Hofstede G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd edn). Sage: Thousands Oaks, CA.
27. Hox JJ. 1994. Hierarchical regression models for interviewer and respondent effects. Sociological Methods and Research 22(1): 300-318.
28. Hu YS. 1992. Global or stateless corporations are national firms with international operations. California Management Review 34(2): 107-126.
29. Hymer S. 1960/1976. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment. MIT Press: Boston, MA.
30. Jones GG. 1993. British Multinational Banking 1830-1990. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
31. Kindleberger CP. 1969. American Investment Abroad. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
32. King AD. 1990. Global Cities: Post-Imperialism and the Internationalization of London. Routledge: London.
33. Kobrin SJ. 1991. An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 12: 17-31.
34. Kogut B. 1993. Country Competitiveness: Technology and the Organization of Work. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
35. Kogut B, Singh H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies 19(3): 411-432.
36. Kostova T, Zaheer S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review 24(1): 64-81.
37. Law KS, Wong CS, Mobley WH. 1998. Towards a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 741-755.
38. London Business School. 1995. The competitive position of London's financial services: final report. A report prepared for the Corporation of London: London.
39. London Economics. 1995. The City and Inward Investment revitalising the U.K. economy. A report by London Economics.
40. McClelland GH. 2000. Nasty data: unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, Resi HT, Judd CM (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. ; 393-411.
41. McDowell L. 1997. A tale of two cities? Embedded organisations and embodied workers in the City of London. In Geographies of Economics, Lee R, Wills J (eds). Arnold: London; 118-129.
42. McKendrick DG. 2001. Global strategy and population-level learning: the case of hard disk drives. Strategic Management Journal 22(4): 307-334.
43. Mezias JM. 2002. Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: the case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal 23(3): 229-344.
44. Michie RC. 1992. The City of London: Continuity and Change, 1850-1990. Macmillan: Basingstoke.
45. Miller SR. 2001. Performance of host country and foreign banks: an integration of LOF and national competitive advantage perspectives. Mimeo, University of Texas at Austin.
46. Miller SR, Parkhe A. 2002. Is there a liability of foreignness in global banking? An empirical test of banks' X-efficiency. Strategic Management Journal 32(1): 55-75.
47. Morgan G. 1997. The global context of financial services: national systems and the international political economy. In Regulation and Deregulation in European Financial Services, Morgan G, Knights D (eds). Macmillan Business: Basingstoke; 14-41.
48. Nachum L. 1999. The Origins of the International Competitiveness of Firms: The Impact of Location and Ownership in Professional Service Industries. Edward Elgar: Aldershot.
49. Nachum L. 2000a. FDI, the location advantages of home countries and the competitiveness of TNCs: U.S. FDI in professional service industries. In The Globalization of Services: Some Implications for Theory and Practice, Aharoni Y, Nachum L (eds). Routledge: London; 75-92.
50. Nachum L. 2000b. Global financial centres in an era of globalisation. Working paper series of the Geneva Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, no. 233.
51. Newall P. 1996. Japan and the City of London. Athlone: London.
52. Nohria N, Ghoshal S. 1997. The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
53. O'Brian R. 1992. Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. Royal Institute of International Affairs: London.
54. Poole MS, Van de Yen AH. 1989. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review 14(4): 562-578.
55. Pred A. 1980. Urban Growth and City System in the United States, 1840-60. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
56. Roberts R (ed.). 1994. Global Financial Centres. Vol. II: London, New York, Tokyo. Edward Elgar: Aldershot.
57. Rose H. 1994a. International banking developments and London's position as an international banking centre. A report prepared for the City Research Project, London Business School.
58. Rose H. 1994b. London as an international financial centre: a narrative history. A report prepared for the City Research Project, London Business School.
59. Rosenzweig PM, Nohria N. 1994. Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 229-252.
60. Rosenzweig PM, Singh JV. 1991. Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review 16(2): 340-361.
61. Rugman AM, Verbeke A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies 23(4): 761-771.
62. Sassen S. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
63. Sassen S. 1999. Global financial centers. Foreign Affairs 78(1): 75-87.
64. Schilling MA, Steensma HK. 2002. The use of modular organizational forms: an industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1149-1168.
65. Schoonhoven CB. 1981. Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency 'theory.' Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 349-377.
66. Shenkar O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies 32(3): 519-535.
67. Shukla RK, van Inwegen GB. 1995. Do locals perform better than foreigners? An analysis of U.K. and U.S. mutual fund managers. Journal of Economics and Business 47(2): 241-254.
68. Sigma 2000. The insurance industry in the face of globalization. Sigma report no. 4/2000, Swiss Re: Zurich.
69. Smith AD. 1992. International Financial Markets: The Competitive Performance of Britain and its Rivals. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
70. Steinherr A, Huveneers C. 1994. On the performance of differently regulated financial institutions: some empirical evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance 18(2): 271-306.
71. Studenmund AH. 1992. Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide. Harper Collins: New York.
72. Sullivan D. 1994. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 325-342.
73. Thomas LG, Waring G. 1999. Competing capitalisms: capital investment in American, German and Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal 20(8): 729-748.
74. Thrift N. 1994. On the social and cultural determinants of international financial centres: the case of the City of London. In Money, Power and Space, Corbridge S, Thrift N, Martin R (eds). Blackwell: Oxford; 327-355.
75. Tschoegl AE. 1987. International retail banking as a strategy: an assessment. Journal of International Business Studies 19(2): 67-88.
76. Tschoegl AE. 1988. Foreign banks in Japan. Bank of Japan Monetary and Economic Studies 6(1): 93-118.
77. Warner F. 1991. Anglo-Japanese Financial Relations. Oxford University Press/Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
78. Whitley R (ed.). 1992. European Business Systems: Firms and markets in their National Contexts. Sage: London.
79. Zaheer S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38(2): 341-363.
80. Zaheer S. 2000. Time zone economies and managerial work in a global world. In Innovations in International Cross-Cultural Management, Earley PC, Singh H (eds). London: Sage; 339-353.
81. Zaheer S, Mosakowski E. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal 18(6): 439-464.
82. Zeile WJ. 1998. Imported inputs and the domestic content of production by foreign-owned manufacturing affiliates in the United States. In Geography and Ownership as Bases for Economic Accounting, Baldwin RE, Lipsey RE, Richardson JD (eds). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL; 205-234.