Generation of EST and microarray resources for functional genomic studies on chicken intestinal health

Animal Biotechnology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 133-143

  Van Hemert, Saskia ^a   Ebbelaar, Bastiaan H ^a   Smits, Mari A ^a   Rebel, Johanna M J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chicken; Intestinal health; Library; Microarray

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; DNA; DNA SEQUENCES; HEALTH;

CHICKEN; EXPRESSED SEQUENCED TAGS; INTESTINAL HEALTH; MALABSORPTION SYNDROME; MICROARRAY RESOURCES;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ANIMALIA; GALLUS GALLUS;

MESSENGER RNA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHICKEN; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA SEQUENCE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; JEJUNUM; MALABSORPTION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LIBRARY; GENOMICS; JEJUNUM; MALABSORPTION SYNDROMES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, MESSENGER; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 0347516268     PISSN: 10495398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/ABIO-120026483     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Songserm T, Zekarias B, van Roozelaar DJ, Kok RS, Pol JMA, Pijpers A, ter Huurne A. Experimental reproduction of malabsorption syndrome with different combinations of reovirus, Escherichia coli, and treated homogenates obtained from broilers. Avian Dis 2002; 46(1):87-94.
2. Yonash N, Bacon LD, Witter RL, Cheng HH. High resolution mapping and identification of new quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting susceptibility to Marek's disease. Anim Genet 1999; 30(2):126-135.
3. Liu HC, Cheng HH, Tirunagaru V, Sofer L, Burnside J. A strategy to identify positional candidate genes conferring Marek's disease resistance by integrating DNA microarrays and genetic mapping. Anim Genet 2001; 32(6):351-359.
4. Moody DE. Genomics techniques: an overview of methods for the study of gene expression. J Anim Sci 2001; 79(Suppl):E1280-E135.
5. Morgan RW, Sofer L, Anderson AS, Bernberg EL, Cui J, Burnside J. Induction of host gene expression following infection of chicken embryo fibroblasts with oncogenic Marek's disease virus. J Virol 2001; 75(1):533-539.
6. Neiman PE, Ruddell A, Jasoni C, Loring G, Thomas SJ, Brandvold KA, Lee R, Burnside J, Delrow J. Analysis of gene expression during myconcogene-induced lymphomagenesis in the bursa of Fabricius. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98(11):6378-6383.
7. Smith E, Shi L, Smith G. Expressed sequence tags for the chicken genome from a normalized 10-day-old white leghorn whole-embryo cDNA library. 3. DNA sequence analysis of genetic variation in commercial chicken populations. Genome 2002; 45(2):261-267.
8. Meltzer PS. Spotting the target: microarrays for disease gene discovery. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11(3):258-263.
9. Zekarias B, Songserm T, Post J, Kok GL, Pol JM. Developments of organs and intestinal mucosa leukocytes in four broiler lines that differ in susceptibility to malabsorption syndrome. Poult Sci 2002; 81(9):1283-1288.
10. Songserm T, Pol JM, van Roozelaar D, Kok GL, Wagenaar F, ter Huurne AA. A comparative study of the pathogenesis of malabsorption syndrome in broilers. Avian Dis 2000; 44(3):556-567.
11. Boardman PE, Sanz Eszquerro J, Overton IM, Burt DW, Bosch E, Fong WT, Tickle C, Brown WRA, Wilson SA, Hubbard SJ. A comprehensive collection of chicken cDNAs. Cur Biol 2002; 12(22):1965-1969.
12. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25(17):3389-3402.
13. Karsten SL, Van Deerlin VMD, Sabatti C, Gill LH, Geschwind DH. An evaluation of tyramide signal amplification and archived fixed and frozen tissue in microarray gene expression analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30(2):E4.
14. Dudoit S, Yang YH, Callow MJ, Speed TP. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Statistica sinica 2002; 12(1):111-139.
15. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, Speed TP. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30(4):e15.
16. Yao J, Burton JL, Saama P, Sipkovsky S, Coussens PM. Generation of EST and cDNA microarray resources for the study of bovine immunobiology. Acta Vet Scand 2001; 42(3):391-405.
17. Carre W, Diot C, Fillon V, Crooijmans RP, Lagarrigue S, Morrisson M, Vignal A, Groenen MA, Douaire M. Development of 112 unique expressed sequence tags from chicken liver using an arbitrarily primed reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and single strand conformation gel purification method. Anim Genet 2001; 32(5):289-297.
18. Zekarias B, Ter Huurne A, Landman WJM, Rebel JMJ, Pol JMA, Gruys E. Immunological basis of differences in disease resistance in the chicken. Vet Res 2002; 33(2):109-125.
19. Songserm T, Engel B, van Roozelaar DJ, Kok GL, Pijpers A, Pol JMA, ter Huurne AAHM. Cellular immune response in the small intestine of two broiler chicken lines orally inoculated with malabsorption syndrome homogenates. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2002; 85(1-2):51-62.
20. Afshari CA. Perspective: microarray technology, seeing more than spots. Endocrinology 2002; 143(6):1983-1989.
21. Nakano T, Graf T. Goose-type lysozyme gene of the chicken: sequence, genomic organization and expression reveals major differences to chicken-type lysozyme gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1991; 1090(2):273-276.
22. Harmon BG. Avian heterophils in inflammation and disease resistance. Poult Sci 1998; 77(7):972-977.