Spatial forest plan development with ecological and economic goals

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 169, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 215-236

  Bettinger, Pete ^a   Johnson, Debora L ^b   Johnson, K Norman ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacency constraints; Forest planning; Spatial harvest scheduling; Spotted owl; Wildlife habitat

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; RAPTOR; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC NORTHWEST;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS; STRIGIFORMES; STRIX; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS CAURINA;

EID: 0347365860     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00271-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arthaud, G.J., Rose, D., 1996. A methodology for estimating production possibility frontiers for wildlife habitat and timber value at the landscape level. Can. J. Forest Res. 26, 2191-2200.
2. Bettinger, P., Graetz, D., Boston, K., Sessions, J., Chung, W., 2002. Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fennica 36, 561-584.
3. Bettinger, P., Sessions, J., Boston, K., 1997. Using tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. Ecol. Model. 94, 111-123.
4. Bettinger, P., Sessions, J., Johnson, K.N., 1998. Ensuring the compatibility of aquatic habitat and commodity production goals in eastern Oregon with a tabu search procedure. Forest Sci. 44, 96-112.
5. Boston, K., Bettinger, P., 2002. Combining tabu search and genetic algorithm heuristic techniques to solve spatial harvest scheduling problems. Forest Sci. 48, 35-46.
6. Chen, V.B.W., Gadow, K.V., 2002. Timber harvest planning with spatial objectives, using the method of simulated annealing. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 121, 25-34.
7. Dueck, G., Scheuer, T., 1990. Threshold accepting: a general purpose optimization algorithm appearing superior to simulated annealing. J. Comput. Phys. 90, 161-175.
8. Haight, R.G., Travis, L.E., 1997. Wildlife conservation planning using stochastic optimization and importance sampling. Forest Sci. 43, 129-139.
9. Hof, J., Bevers, M., Joyce, L., Kent, B., 1994. An integer programming approach for spatially and temporally optimizing wildlife populations. Forest Sci. 40, 177-191.
10. Hoganson, H.M., Rose, D., 1984. A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. Forest Sci. 30, 220-238.
11. Jørgensen, S.E., 1997. Ecological modelling by 'Ecological Modelling'. Ecol. Model. 100, 5-10.
12. Jørgensen, S.E., 2000. Editorial: 25 years of ecological modelling by Ecological Modelling. Ecol. Model. 126, 95-99.
13. Kangas, J., Pukkala, T., 1996. Operationalization of biological diversity as a decision objective in tactical forest planning. Can. J. Forest Res. 26, 103-111.
14. Kurttila, M., Pukkala, T., Loikkanen, J., 2002. The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. Forest Ecol. Manage. 166, 245-260.
15. Lockwood, C., Moore, T., 1993. Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a simulated annealing approach. Can. J. Forest Res. 23, 468-478.
16. Murray, A.T., Church, R.L., 1995. Heuristic solution approaches to operational forest planning problems. OR Spektrum [Operations Res.] 17, 193-203.
17. Murray, A.T., 1999. Spatial restrictions in harvest scheduling. Forest Sci. 45, 45-52.
18. Nelson, J., Brodie, J.D., 1990. Comparison of a random search algorithm and mixed integer programming for solving area-based forest plans. Can. J. Forest Res. 20, 934-942.
19. Öhman, K., Eriksson, L.O., 2002. Allowing for spatial consideration in long-term forest planning by linking linear programming with simulated annealing. Forest Ecol. Manage. 161, 221-230.
20. Oregon State Legislature, 2001. Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 527. http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/527.html (accessed 7/ 16/02).
21. Oregon State University Research Forests, 1992. McDonald-Dunn research forest plan. College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
22. Pulkki, R., 1984. A spatial database - heuristic programming system for aiding decision-making in long-distance transport of wood. Acta Forestalia Fennica 188.
23. Thomas, J.W., Forsman, E.D., Lint, J.B., Meslow, E.C., Noon, B.R., Verner, J., 1990. A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl: a report of the Interagency Scientific Committee to address the conservation of the northern spotted owl. USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service, 427 p.
24. United States Congress, 1973. Endangered Species Act. 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C., pp. 1531-1544.
25. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1996. An Environmental Alternatives Analysis for the 4(d) Rule for the Northern Spotted Owl. Portland, OR.
26. Washington State Legislature, 2002. Title 222 WAC (Washington Administrative Code), Forest Practices Board. http://www. leg.wa.gov/wac/index. cfm?fuseaction=title&title=222 (accessed 7/26/02).
27. Weintraub, A., Jones, G., Magendzo, A., Meacham, M., Kirby, M., 1994. A heuristic system to solve mixed integer forest planning models. Operations Res. 42, 1010-1024.
28. Weintraub, A., Jones, G., Meacham, M., Magendzo, A., Magendzo, A., Malchuk, D., 1995. Heuristic procedures for solving mixed-integer harvest scheduling - transportation planning models. Can. J. Forest Res. 25, 1618-1626.
29. Yoshimoto, A., 2001. Potential use of a spatially constrained harvest scheduling model for biodiversity concerns: exclusion periods to create heterogeneity in forest structure. J. Forest Res. 6, 21-30.