A methodology for estimating production possibility frontiers for wildlife habitat and timber value at the landscape level

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 2191-2200

  Arthaud, Greg J ^a   Rose, Dietmar W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPEN; RUFFED GROUSE; TIMBER VALUE; WILDLIFE HABITAT;

USA, MINNESOTA, ITASCA COUNTY;

BONASA UMBELLUS; PHASIANIDAE; POPULUS GRANDIDENTATA; POPULUS TREMULOIDES; SALICACEAE; SALIX;

EID: 0030419387     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x26-248     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arthaud, G.J. 1991. Aspen timber value and ruffed grouse habitat: economic trade-offs considering spatial and temporal dimensions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn.
2. Buech, R.R., Martin, C.J., and Rauscher, H.M. 1990. The grouse management advisory system compartment module. U.S. Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minn.
3. Bullard, H.S., Sherali, H.D., and Klemperer, W.D. 1985. Estimating optimal thinning and rotation for mixed-species timber stands using a random search algorithm. For. Sci. 31(2): 301-315.
4. Clements, S.E., Dallain, P.L., and Jamnick, M.S. 1990. An operational, spatially constrained harvest scheduling model. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 1438-1447.
5. Duinker, P., Higgelke, P., and Koppikar, S. 1991. GIS-based habitat supply modeling in northern Ontario: Moose and Marten. In Proceedings of GIS '91 International Symposium on Geographic Information Systems, 12-15 Feb., Vancouver, B.C. Edited by H. Schreier, S. Brown, P. O'Reilly, and P.J. Meehan. Reid, Collins and Associates, Vancouver, B.C. pp. 271-275.
6. Dykstra, D.P. 1984. Mathematical programming for natural resource management. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York.
7. Eng, M.A., McNay, R.S., and Page, R.E. 1991. Integrated management of forestry and wildlife habitat with the aid of a GIS-based habitat assessment and planning tool. In GIS applications in natural resources. Edited by M. Heit and A. Shortreid. GIS World Inc., Fort Collins, Colo. pp. 331-336.
8. Gregory, G.R. 1955. An economic approach to multiple use. For. Sci. 1: 6-13.
9. Gullion, G.W., and Svoboda, F.J. 1972. The basic habitat resource for ruffed grouse. In Proceedings of Aspen Symposium. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-1. pp. 113-119.
10. Hazenstab, R.A., Bowyer, J.L., Bradley, D.P., and Hoganson, H.M. 1987. An assessment of productivity and harvesting costs for various harvest systems. In Achieving wood energy potentials: evidence in northeastern Minnesota. Compiled by D.P. Bradley and D.C. Lothner. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-114. pp. 57-66.
11. Hof, J.G., and Joyce, L.A. 1992. Spatial optimization for wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. For. Sci. 38(3): 489-508.
12. Hof, J.G., and Joyce, L.A. 1993. A mixed integer linear programming approach for spatially optimizing wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. For. Sci. 39(4): 816-834.
13. Hof, J., Bevers, M., Joyce, L., and Kent, B. 1994. An integer programming approach for spatially and temporally optimizing wildlife populations. For. Sci. 40(1): 177-191.
14. Husch, B., Miller, C.I., and Beers, T.W. 1972. Forest mensuration. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
15. Jones, J.G., and Schuster, E.G. 1985. An application of discrete optimization for developing economically efficient multiple-use projects. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-178.
16. Lillesand, T.M., and Kiefer, R.W. 1979. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
17. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 1990. Minnesota forest products price report 1990. Division of Forestry, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Grand Rapids.
18. Muhlenberg, N. 1964. A method for approximating forest multiple-use optima. For. Sci. 10: 209-212.
19. Nelson, J., and Brodie, J.D. 1990. Comparison of a random search algorithm and mixed integer programming for solving area-based forest plans. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 934-942.
20. O'Hara, A.J., Faaland, B.H., and Bare, B.B. 1989. Spatially constrained timber harvest scheduling. Can J. For. Res. 19: 715-724.
21. Perala, D.A. 1977. Manager's handbook for aspen in the north-central States. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech Rep. NC-36.
22. Rickers J.R., Queen, L.P., and Arthaud, G.J. 1995. A proximity-based approach to assessing habitat. Landscape Ecol. 10(5): 309-321.
23. Schulz, T.T., and Joyce, L.A. 1992. A spatial application of a martin habitat model. Wild. Soc. Bull. 20(1): 74-83.
24. Sessions, J., and Sessions, J. 1988. SNAP - a scheduling and network analysis program for tactical planning. In Proceedings of the International Mountain Logging and Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, 12-16 Dec. 1988, Portland, Oregon. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis. pp. 71-75.
25. Smith, T.M., Shugart, H.H., Jr., and West, D.C. 1981. Use of forest simulation models to integrate timber harvest and nongame bird management. In Transactions of the 46th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 21-25 March 1981, Washington, D.C. Edited by K. Sabol. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C. pp. 501-510.
26. Tomlin, C.D. 1990. Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
27. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1981. Standard for the development of suitability index models. Ecological Services Manual 103. U.S. Dept. of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Services, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
28. Winebar, B.L., and Gunter, J.E. 1984. Costs of forest management practices in the Lake States. Michigan State University, East Lansing. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 457.