Czech hop characterization using RAPD method and genetic distance analysis of selected genotypes

Rostlinna Vyroba

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 165-172

  Patzak, J ^a   Oriniakova P ^b   Matousek J ^b   Svoboda, P ^a  

^a Chmelarsky Institut   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

DNA fingerprinting; Genetic distance analysis; Hop; Humulus lupulus L.; Microsatellite sequences; PCR; RAPD; STS; Varieties

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347182982     PISSN: 0370663X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abbott M. S., Fedele M. J. (1994): A DNA-based identification procedure for hop leaf tissue. J. Inst. Brew., 100: 283-285.
2. Brady J. L., Scott N. S., Thomas M. R. (1996); DNA typing of hops (Humulus lupulus) through application of RAPD and microsatellite marker sequences converted to sequence tagget sites (STS). Euphytica, 97: 277-284.
3. Jakše J., Šuštar-Vozlič J., Javornik B. (1994): Identification of hop cultivars by RAPD markers. Proc. Int. Colloq. Impact of Plant Biotechnology on Agriculture, Rogla, Slovenia: 147-151.
4. Krajl D., Zupanec J. (1991): Variability of essential oils of hops, Humulus lupulus L. J. Inst. Brew., 97: 197-206.
5. Leggett G. W., Salier D. G., Brady J. L., Steele Scott N., Thomas M. R. (1994): DNA typing and the identification of hops. E.B.C. Symp. Monogr. XXII. Zoeterwoude. Netherlands: 45-53.
6. Peacock V. E., McCarty P. (1992): Varietal identification of hops and hop pellets. MBAA Techn. Quart., 29: 81-85.
7. Pillay, M., Kenny S. T. (1994): Chloroplast DNA differences between cultivated hop, Humulus lupulus and the related species H. japonicus. Theor. Appl. Genet., 89: 372-378.
8. Pillay M., Kenny S. T. (1996a): Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in hop, Humulus lupulus: Level of genetic variability and segregation in F1 progeny. Theor. Appl. Genet., 92: 334-339.
9. Pillay M., Kenny S. T. (1996b): Structure and inheritance of ribosomal DNA variants in cultivated and wild hop, Humulus lupulus L. Theor. Appl. Genet., 93: 333-340.
10. Polley A., Seigner E., Ganal M. W. (1997): Identification of sex in hop (Humulus lupulus) using molecular markers. Genome, 40: 357-361.
11. Saghai-Maroof M. A., Soliman K. M., Jorgensen R. A., Allard R. W. (1984): Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 81: 8014-8018.
12. Saito M., Nei M. (1987): The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstruction phylogenetic trees. Molec. Biol. Evol., 4: 406-425.
13. Thomas M. R., Scott N. S. (1993): Microsatellite repeats in grapevine reveal DNA polymorphism when analyzed as sequence tagget sites (STS). Theor. Appl. Genet., 86: 985-990.
14. Thomas M. R., Matsumoto S., Cain P., Scott N. S. (1993): Repetitive DNA of grapevine: Classes present and sequences suitable for cultivar identification. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 173-180.
15. Tsuchiya Y., Araki S., Takashio M., Tamaki T. (1997): Identification of hop varieties using specific primers derived from RAPD markers. J. Ferment. Bioengng, 84: 103-107.
16. Vejl P. (1997): Identification of genotypes in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) by RAPD analysis using program Gel Manager for Windows. Rostl., Výr., 43: 325-333.
17. Williams J. G. K., Kubelik A. R., Livak K. J., Rafalski J. A., Tingey S. V. (1990): DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res., 18: 6531-6535.