Deviations from the population-averaged versus cluster-specific relationship for clustered binary data

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-16

  Ten Have, Thomas R ^a   Ratcliffe, Sarah J ^a   Reboussin, Beth A ^b   Miller, Michael E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; COVARIANCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; POPULATION MODEL; REVIEW; RISK; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY; TYPES OF STUDY;

EID: 0347089309     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0962280204sm355ra     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Williams D. The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 1975; 31: 949-52.
2. Breslow N, Day N. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. I. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Scientific Publications No. 32, 1980.
3. Stiratelli R, Liard N, Ware J. Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics 1984; 40: 961-71.
4. Liang K-Y, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13-22.
5. Connolly M, Liang K-Y. Conditional logistic regression models for correlated binary data. Biometrika 1988; 75: 501-506.
6. Ten Have T, Reboussin B, Miller M, Kunselman A. Mixed effects logistic regression models for multiple longitudinal binary functional limitation responses with informative drop-out and confounding by baseline outcomes. Biometrics 2002; 58: 137-44.
7. Becker M, Yang I. Latent class marginal models for cross-classifications of counts. Sociological Methodology 1998; 28: 293-325.
8. Sammel M, Ryan L, Legler J. Latent variable models for mixed discrete and continuous outcomes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1997; 59: 667-78.
9. Reboussin B, Liang K-Y. An estimating equations approach for the LISCOMP model. Psychometrika 1998; 6: 165-82.
10. Reboussin B, Liang K-Y, Reboussin D. Estimating for a latent transition model with multiple discrete indicators. Biometrics 2000; 55: 839-45.
11. Zeger S, Liang K-Y, Albert P. Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 1049-60.
12. Neuhaus J, Kalbfleisch J, Hauck W. A comparison of cluster-specific and population-averaged approaches for analyzing correlated binary data. International Statistical Review 1991; 59: 25-35.
13. Graubard B, Korn E. Regression analysis with clustered data. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13: 509-22.
14. Ten Have T, Kunselman A, Zharichenko E. Accommodating negative intracluster correlation in mixed effects models for clustered binary response data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1998; 8: 131-49.
15. Coull B, Agresti A. The use of mixed logit models to reflect heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies. Biometrics 1999; 55: 291-301.
16. Berlin JJ, Kimmel S, Ten Have T, Sammel M. An empiricial comparison of several clustered data approaches under confounding due to cluster effects in the analysis of complications of coronary angioplasty. Biometrics 1999; 55: 470-76.
17. Neuhaus J, Kalbfleisch J. Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data. Biometrics 1998; 54: 638-45.
18. Ten Have T, Landis J, Weaver S. Association models for periodontal disease progression: A comparison of methods for clustered binary data. Statistics in Medicine 1995; 14: 413-30.
19. Crouchley R, Davies R. A comparison of population-average and random effects models for the analysis of longitudinal count data with baseline information. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1999; 162: 331-47.
20. Mauritsen R. EGRET Reference Manual. Seattle: Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corporation (SERC), 1990.
21. Ten Have T, Pulkstenis E, Kunselman A, Landis J. Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative dropout. Biometrics 1998; 54: 367-83.
22. Lehmann E. Some concepts of dependence. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1966; 37: 1137-53.