Efficiency of Spatial Analyses of Field Pea Variety Trials

Crop Science

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 49-55

  Yang, Rong Cai ^a,b   Ye, Terrance Z ^a   Blade, Stanford F ^a   Bandara, Manjula ^a  

^a ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PISUM; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 0347028301     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.4900     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Agrobase. 1999. Agrobase 99 user's guide and reference manual. Agronomix Software, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
2. Ball, S.T., D.J. Mulla, and C.F. Konzak. 1993. Spatial heterogeneity affects variety trial interpretation. Crop Sci. 33:931-935.
3. Bartlett, M.S. 1978. Nearest neighbour models in the analysis of field experiments. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 40:147-174.
4. Binns, M.R. 1987. Practical use of neighbor methods and alternatives in the analysis of field trials. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:477-489.
5. Blade, S.F., G.W. Clayton, and D.J. Lyon. 2002. Symposium papers: Introduction. Agron. J. 94:173-174.
6. Brownie, C., D.T. Bowman, and J.W. Burton. 1993. Estimating spatial variation in analysis of data from yield trials: A comparison of methods. Agron. J. 85:1244-1253.
7. Clarke, F.R., R.J. Baker, and R.M. DePauw. 1994. Moving mean and least squares smoothing for the analysis of grain yield data. Crop Sci. 34:1479-1483.
8. Cochran, W.G., and G.M. Cox. 1957. Experimental designs. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
9. Cullis, B.R., and A.C. Gleeson. 1989. The efficiency of neighbor analysis for replicated variety trials in Australia. J. Agric. Sci. 113:223-239.
10. Gilmour, A.R., B.R. Cullis, and A.P. Verbyla. 1997. Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2:269-293.
11. Gleeson, A.C., and B.R. Cullis. 1987. Residual maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of a neighbour model for field experiments. Biometrics 43:277-288.
12. Green, P., C. Jennison, and A. Seheult. 1985. Analysis of field experiments by least squares smoothing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 47:299-315.
13. Grondona, M.O., J. Crossa, P.N. Fox, and W.H. Pfeiffer. 1996. Analysis of variety trials using two-dimensional separable ARIMA processes. Biometrics 52:763-770.
14. Helms, T.C., R.A. Scott, and J.J. Hammond. 1999. Intrablock variance among duplicate treatments for nearest-neighbor analysis. Agron. J. 91:317-320.
15. Kempton, R.A., and C.W. Howes. 1981. The use of neighboring plot values in the analysis of variety trials. Appl. Stat. 30:59-70.
16. Kempton, R.A., J.C. Seraphin, and A.M. Sword. 1994. Statistical analysis of two-dimensional variation in variety yield trials. J. Agric. Sci. 122:335-342.
17. Park, B., and K. Lopetinsky. 1999. Pulse crops in Alberta. Alberta Agriculture, Food, and Rural Development, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
18. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS/IML Workshop. Version 2.0. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
19. Stroup, W.W., P.S. Baenziger, and D.K. Mulitze. 1994. Removing spatial variation from wheat yield trials: A comparison of methods. Crop Sci. 34:62-66.
20. Wilkinson, G.N., S.R. Eckert, T.W. Hancock, and O. Mayo. 1983. Nearest neighbor (NN) analysis of field experiments. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 45:151-211.
21. Wu, T., D.E. Mather, and P. Dutilleul. 1998. Application of geostatistical and neighbor analyses to data from plant breeding trials. Crop Sci. 38:1545-1553.
22. Zimmerman, D.L., and D.A. Harville. 1991. A random field approach to the analysis of field-plot experiments and other spatial experiments. Biometrics 47:223-239.