Intrablock variance among duplicate treatments for nearest-neighbor analyses

Agronomy Journal

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 317-320

  Helms, Theodore C ^a   Scott, Roy A ^b   Hammond, James J ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 0032812410     PISSN: 00021962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100020022x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bartlett, M.S. 1938. The approximate recovery of information from field experiments with large blocks. J. Agric. Sci. 28:418-427.
2. Binns, M.R. 1987. Practical use of neighbor methods and alternatives in the analysis of field trials. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:477-489.
3. Helms, T.C., J.H. Orf, and R.A. Scott. 1995. Nearest-neighbor-adjusted means as a selection criterion within two soybean populations. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75:857-863.
4. Mulitze, D.K. 1992. Agrobase IV reference manual. Agronomix Software, Portage la Prairie, MB.
5. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: Statistics. 5th ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
6. Schwarzbach, E. 1984. A new approach in the evaluation of field trials: The determination of the most likely genetic ranking of varieties. Vortr. Pflanzenzuecht. 6:249-259.
7. Stroup, W.W., P.S. Baenziger, and D.K. Mulitze. 1994. Removing spatial variation from wheat yield trials: A comparison of methods. Crop Sci. 34:62-66.