Electrostatic potential profile and nonlinear current in an interacting one-dimensional molecular wire

Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences: Chemical Sciences

Volumn 115, Issue 5-6 SPEC. ISS., 2003, Pages 533-542

  Lakshmi, S ^a   Pati, Swapan K ^a  

^a JAWAHARLAL NEHRU CENTRE FOR ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Chemisorption; Extended Hubbard model; Molecular wire; Nonlinear current; Potential profile

Indexed keywords

CHEMISORPTION; CORRELATION METHODS; CURRENT VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRODES; ELECTROSTATICS; HAMILTONIANS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; POISSON EQUATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL PROFILE; MOLECULAR WIRE; NONLINEAR CURRENT; RAMP FUNCTION; SCATTERING FORMALISM; WEAK ELECTRON CORRELATIONS;

MOLECULAR PHYSICS; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM WIRES;

EXTENDED HUBBARD MODEL; MOLECULAR WIRE; NONLINEAR CURRENT; POTENTIAL PROFILE;

EID: 0346991331     PISSN: 02534134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02708245     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jortner J and Ratner M A (eds) 1997 Molecular electronics (London: Blackwell)
2. Birge R R (ed.) 1994 Molecular and biomolecular electronics (Washington, DC: ACS)
3. Segal D, Nitzan A, Ratner M A and Davis W B 2000 J. Phys. Chem. B104 2791
4. Nitzan A Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. (in press)
5. Kergueris C, Bourgoin J P, Palacin S, Esteve D, Urbina C, Magoga M and Joachim C 1999 Phys. Rev. B59 12505
6. Kergueris C, Bourgoin J P and Palacin S 1999 Nanotechnology 10 8
7. Reed M A, Zhou C, Muller C J, Burgin T P and Tour J M 1997 Science 278 252
8. Tans S J, Devoret M H, Dai H, Thess A, Smalley R E, Geerligs L J and Dekker C 1997 Nature (London) 474 474
9. de Picciotto R, Stormer H L, Pfeiffer L N, Baldwin K W and West K W 2001 Nature (London) 411 51
10. Datta S 1995 Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems (Cambridge: University Press)
11. Aviram A and Ratner M A 1998 Molecular electronics: Science and technology (New York: New York Academy of Science) p. 852
12. Samanta M P, Tian W, Datta S, Henderson J I and Kubiak C P 1996 Phys. Rev. B53 R7626
13. Damle P S, Ghosh A W and Datta S 2001 Phys. Rev. B64 201403
14. Krzeminski C, Delerue C, Allan G, Haguet V and Stievenard D, Frere P, Levillain E and Roncali J 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 111 6643
15. Buttiker M and Landauer R 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1739
16. Buttiker M and Landauer R 1985 Phys. Scr. 32 429
17. Anderson P W 1961 Phys. Rev. 124 41
18. Newns D M 1969 Phys. Rev. 178 1123
19. Mujica V, Kemp M, Roitberg A E and Ratner M A 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 104 7296
20. Mujica V, Kemp M and Ratner M A 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 101 6849
21. Keiss H G (ed.) 1992 Conjugated conducting polymers (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)
22. Pati S K 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 6529
23. Tian W. Datta S, Hong S, Reifenberger R, Henderson J I and Kubiak C P 1998 J. Chem. Phys. 109 2874
24. Mujica V, Roitberg A E and Ratner M A 2000 J. Chem. Phys. 112 6834
25. Datta S, Tian W, Hong S, Reifenberger R, Henderson J I and Kubiak C P 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2530