Binaural processing in the synthesis of auditory spatial receptive fields

Biological Cybernetics

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 371-377

  Peña, José Luis ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; AUDITION; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

AUDITORY SPATIAL RECEPTIVE FIELDS; BINAURAL PROCESSING; INTERAURAL LEVEL; INTERAURAL TIME;

CYBERNETICS;

ANIMAL; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; HEARING; NERVE CELL; OWL; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; STRIGIFORMES;

EID: 0346937282     PISSN: 03401200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00422-003-0442-6     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adolphs R (1993) Bilateral inhibition generates neuronal responses tuned to interaural level differences in the auditory brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci 13; 3647-3668
2. Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E (1985) Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci 8: 407-430
3. Arthur BJ (2001) Neural computations leading to space-specific auditory responses in the barn owl. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
4. Brugge JF, Reale RA, Jenison RL, Schnupp J (2001) Auditory cortical spatial receptive fields. Audiol Neurootol 6: 173-177
5. Carr CE, Konishi M (1990) A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci 10: 3227-3246
6. Colburn HS (1973) Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. I. General strategy and preliminary results on in- teraural discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 54: 1458-1470
7. Delgutte B, Joris PX, Litovsky RY, Yin TC (1999) Receptive fields and binaural interactions for virtual-space stimuli in the cat inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 81: 2833-2851
8. Egnor SER (2000) The role of spectral cues in sound localization by the barn owl. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
9. Euston DR, Takahashi TT (2002) From spectrum to space: the contribution of level difference cues to spatial receptive fields in the barn owl inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 22: 284-293
10. Gold JI, Knudsen EI (2000) A site of auditory experience-dependent plasticity in the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl's inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 20: 3469-3486
11. Imig T, Poirier JP, Irons WA, Samson FK (1997) Monaural spectral contrast mechanism for neural sensitivity to sound direction in the medial geniculate body of the cat. J Neurophysiol 78: 2754-2771
12. Jeffress LA (1972) Binaural signal detection: vector theory. In: Tobias JV (ed) Foundations of modern auditory theory, vol 2. Academic, New York
13. Keller CH, Hartung K, Takahashi TT (1998) Head-related transfer functions of the barn owl: measurement and neural responses. Hear Res 118: 13-34
14. Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1978a) A neural map of auditory space in the owl. Science 200: 795-797
15. Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1978b) Center-surround organization of auditory receptive fields in the owl. Science 202: 778-780
16. Macpherson EA, Middlebrooks JC (2002) Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. J Acoust Soc Am 111: 2219-2236
17. Manley GA, Köppl C, Konishi M (1988) A neural map of interaural intensity differences in the brainstem of the barn owl. J Neurosci 8: 2665-2676
18. Mazer J (1998) How the owl resolves auditory coding ambiguity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 10932-10937
19. Mogdans J, Knudsen EI (1994) Representation of interaural level difference in the VLVp, the first site of binaural comparison in the barn owl auditory system. Hear Res 74: 148-164
20. Moiseff A (1989a) Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization. J Comp Physiol 164: 629-636
21. Moiseff A (1989b) Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl. J Comp Physiol 164: 637-644
22. Moiseff A, Konishi M (1983) Binaural characteristics of units in the owl's brainstem auditory pathway: precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields. J Neurosci 3: 2553-2562
23. Mori, K (1997) Across-frequency nonlinear inhibition by GABA in processing of interaural time difference. Hear Res 111: 17-30
24. Mrsic-Flogel TD, King AJ, Jenison RL, Schnupp JW (2001) Listening through different ears alters spatial response fields in ferret primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 86: 1043-1046
25. Olsen JF, Knudsen EI, Esterly SD (1989) Neural maps of interaural time and intensity differences in the optic tectum of the barn owl. J Neurosci 9: 2591-2605
26. Peña JL, Konishi M (2000) Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11787-11792
27. Peña JL, Konishi M (2001) Auditory spatial receptive fields created by multiplication. Science 292: 249-252
28. Peña JL, Konishi M (2002) From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields. J Neurosci 22: 5652-5658
29. Peña JL, Viete S, Albeck Y, Konishi M (1996) Tolerance to sound inteasit of binaural coincidence detection of the owl nucleus laminaris. J Neurosci 16: 7046-7054
30. Peña JL, Viete S, Funabiki K, Saberi K, Konishi M (2001) Cochlear and neural delays for coincidence detection in owls. J Neurosci 21: 9455-9459
31. Poganiatz I, Wagner H (2001) Sound-localization experiments with barn owls in virtual space: influence of broadband interaural level difference on head-turning behavior. J Comp Physiol A 187: 225-233
32. Poganiatz I, Nelken I, Wagner H (2001) Sound-localization experiments with barn owls in virtual space: influence of interaural time difference on head-turning behavior. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2: 1-21
33. Recanzone GH, Guard DC, Phan ML, Su TK (2000) Correlation between the activity of single auditory cortical neurons and sound-localization behavior in the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 83: 2723-2739
34. Saberi K, Takahashi Y, Farahbod H, Konishi M (1999) Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls. Nat Neurosci 2: 656-659
35. Schnupp JW, Mrsic-Flogel DT, King AJ (2001) Linear processing of spatial cues in primary auditory cortex. Nature 414: 200-204
36. Shackleton TM, Meddis R, Hewitt MJ (1992) Across frequency integration in a model of lateralization. J Acoust Soc Am 91: 2276-2279
37. Spezio ML, Takahashi TT (2003) Frequency-specific interaural level difference tuning predicts spatial response patterns of space-specific neurons in the barn owl inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 23: 4677-4688
38. Stern RM, Colburn HS (1978) Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position. J Acoust Soc Am 64: 127-140
39. Stern RM, Zeiberg AS, Trahiotis C (1988) Lateralization of complex binaural stimuli: a weighted-image model. J Acoust Soc Am 84: 156-165
40. Sullivan WE, Konishi M (1984) Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the owl. J Neurosci 4: 1787-1799
41. Takahashi TT, Konishi M (1986) Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain. J Neurosci 6: 3413-3422
42. Takahashi TT, Keller CH (1992) Commisural connections mediate inhibition for the computation of interaural level difference in the barn owl. J Comp Physiol A 170: 161-169
43. Takahashi TT, Moiseff A, Konishi M (1984) Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl. J Neurosci 4: 1781-1786
44. Tollin DJ, Yin CT (2002a) The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth. J Neurosci 22: 1454-1467
45. Tollin DJ, Yin CT (2002b) The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. II. The determinants of spatial receptive fields in azimuth. J Neurosci 22: 1468-1479
46. Trahiotis C, Stern RM (1994) Across-frequency interaction in lateralization of complex binaural stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 96: 3804-3806
47. Viete S. Peña JL, Konishi M (1997) The effects of interaural intensity difference on the processing of interaural time difference in the owl's nucleus laminaris. J Neurosci 17: 1815-1824
48. Wagner H (1990) Receptive fields of neurons in the owl's auditory brainstem change dynamically. Eur J Neurosci 2: 949-959
49. Wagner H, Takahashi TT, Konishi M (1987) Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 7: 3105-3116
50. Wightman FL (1992) The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J Acoust Soc Am 91: 1648-1661
51. Xu L, Furukawa S, Middlebrooks JC (1998) Sensitivity to Sound-Source Elevation in nontonotopic auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 80: 882-894
52. Yin TCT, Chan CK (1988) Neural mechanisms underlying interaural time sensitivity to tones and noise. In: Edelman GM, Gall WE, Cowan WM (eds) Auditory function: neurobiological bases of hearing. Wiley, New York, pp 385-430
53. Yin TCT, Chan JCK (1990) Interaural time sensitivity in the medial superior olive of the cat. J Neurophysiol 64: 465-488