Predicting the spatial distribution of a population in a heterogeneous landscape

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 166, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 53-65

  Westerberg, Lars ^a   Wennergren, Uno ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Density independent; Ideal free distribution; Matrix model; Movement behaviour; Resource matching; Spatially explicit

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HABITAT QUALITY; HETEROGENEITY; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; POPULATION MODELING; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 0346816524     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00118-2     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anderson, K., Neuhauser, C., 2002. Patterns in spatial simulation - are they real? Ecol. Model. 155, 19-30.
2. Bapat, R.B., Raghavan, T.E.S., 1997. Nonnegative matrices and applications. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 40-50.
3. Berec, L., 2002. Techniques of spatially explicit individual-based models: construction, simulation and mean-field analysis. Ecol. Model. 150, 55-81.
4. Bevers, M., Flather, C.H., 1999. Numerically exploring habitat fragmentation effects on populations using cell-based coupled map lattices. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55, 61-76.
5. Brewster, C.C., Allen, J.C., 1997. Spatiotemporal model for studying insect dynamics in large-scale cropping systems. Environ. Entomol. 26, 473-482.
6. Brooks, E.N., Lebreton, J.D., 2001. Optimizing removals to control a metapopulation: application to the yellow legged herring gull (Larus cachinnans). Ecol. Model. 136, 269-284.
7. Caswell, H., 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 710 pp.
8. Chiverton, P.A., 1988. Searching behaviour and cereal aphid consumption by Bembidion lampros and Pterostichus cupreus, in relation to temperature and prey density. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47, 173-182.
9. Crouse, D.T., Crowder, L.B., Caswell, H., 1987. A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68, 1412-1423.
10. Dieckmann, U., Law, R., Metz, J.A.J., 2000. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions. Simplifying Spatial Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 552 pp.
11. Dunning Jr., J.B., Stewart, D.J., Danielson, B.J., Noon, B.R., Root, T.L., Lambersson, R.H., Stevens, E.E., 1995. Spatially explicit populations models: current forms and future uses. Ecol. Appl. 5, 3-11.
12. Fahrig, L., 2002. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 12, 346-353.
13. Fahse, L., Wissel, C., Grimm, V., 1998. Reconciling classical and individual-based approaches in theoretical population ecology: a protocol for extracting population parameters from individual-based models. Am. Nat. 152, 838-852.
14. Firle, S.O., Bommarco, R., Ekbom, B., Natiello, M., 1998. The influence of movement and resting behavior on the range of three carabid beetles. Ecology 79, 2113-2122.
15. Flather, C.H., Bevers, M., 2002. Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: the relative importance of habitat amount and arrangement. Am. Nat. 159, 40-56.
16. Fortin, D., 2002. Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information. Ecol. Model. 153, 279-290.
17. Griebeler, E.M., Seitz, A., 2002. An individual-based model for the conservation of the endangered Large Blue Butterfly, Maculinea anon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ecol. Model. 156, 43-60.
18. Grünbaum, D., 1998. Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes. Am. Nat. 151, 97-115.
19. Habtewold, T., Landin, J., Wennergren, U., Bergman, K.-O., 1995. Life table for the Tef Grasshopper, Aiolopus longicornis, under laboratory conditions and demographic effects of the pathogen Nosema Locustae. Biol. Control, 497-502.
20. Hannunen, S., 2002. Vegetation architecture and redistribution of insects moving on the plant surface. Ecol. Model. 155, 149-157.
21. Hanski, I., Ovaskainen, O., 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404, 755-758.
22. Hiebeler, D., 2000. Populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities: landscape generation and local dispersal. Ecology 81, 1629-1641.
23. Itô, S., 1992. Diffusion equations. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 114. American Mathematical Society, USA, p. 26.
24. Kaneko, K., 1992. Overview of coupled map lattices. Chaos 2, 279-282.
25. Kareiva, P., 1990. Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 330, 175-190.
26. Kareiva, P., Wennergren, U., 1995. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373, 299-302.
27. Kennedy, M., Gray, R.D., 1993. Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution. Oikos 68, 158-166.
28. King, A.W., With, K.A., 2002. Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behaviour really matter? Ecol. Model. 147, 23-39.
29. Lebreton, J.D., 1996. Demographic models for subdivided populations: the renewal equation approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 49, 291-313.
30. Lebreton, J.D., Gonzalez-Davila, G., 1993. An introduction to models of subdivided populations. J. Biol. Syst. 1, 389-423.
31. Lebreton, J.D., Khaladi, M., Grosbois, V., 2000. An explicit approach to evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies: no cost of dispersal. Math. Biosci. 165, 163-176.
32. Lefkovitch, L.P., 1965. The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages. Biometrics 21, 1-18.
33. Matthiopoulos, J., 2003. The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. Ecol. Model. 159, 239-268.
34. Ménard, A., Dubé, P., Bouchard, A., Canham, C.D., Marceau, D.J., 2002. Evaluating the potential of the SORTIE forest succession model for spatio-temporal analysis of smale-scale disturbances. Ecol. Model. 153, 81-96.
35. Murrell, D.J., Law, R., 2000. Beetles in fragmented woodlands: a formal framework for dynamics of movement in ecological landscapes. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 471-483.
36. Neubert, M.G., Kot, M., Lewis, M.A., 1995. Dispersal and pattern formation in a discrete-time predator-prey model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48, 7-43.
37. Ranta, E., Lundberg, P., Kaitala, V., 2000. Size of environmental grain and resource matching. Oikos 89, 573-576.
38. Rogers, A., 1966. The multiregional matrix growth operator and the stable interregional age structure. Demography 3, 537-544.
39. Rogers, A., 1974. The multiregional net maternity function and multiregional growth. Demography 11, 473-481.
40. Shigesada, N., Kawasaki, K., Takeda, Y., 1995. Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. Am. Nat. 146, 229-251.
41. Tilman, D., Kareiva, P., 1997. Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 364 pp.
42. Tregenza, T., 1995. Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv. Ecol. Res. 26, 253-307.
43. Turchin, P., 1998. Quantitative analysis of movement; measuring and modeling population distribution in animals and plants. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 390 pp.
44. Turner, M.G., Arthaud, G.J., Engstrom, R.T., Hejl, S.J., Liu, J., Loeb, S., McKelvey, K., 1995. Usefulness of spatially explicit population models in land management. Ecol. Appl. 5, 12-16.
45. Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., O'Neill, R.V., 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer, New York, 389 pp.
46. Usher, M.B., 1966. A matrix approach to the management of renewable resources, with special reference to selection forests - two extensions. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 355-367.
47. Wallin, H., Ekbom, B.S., 1988. Movements of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) inhabiting cereal fields: a field tracing study. Oecologia 77, 39-43.
48. Wallin, H., Ekbom, B.S., 1994. Influence of hunger level and prey densities on movement patterns in three species of Pterostichus beetles (Coeloptera Carabidae). Popul. Ecol. 23, 1171-1181.
49. Wennergren, U., Weinerfelt, P., Forsling, G., 1994. Comparative sensitivity analysis of stable stage structures and reproductive values. B. Math. Biol. 56, 945-957.
50. Wennergren, U., Ruckelshaus, M., Kareiva, P., 1995. The promise and limitations of spatial models in conservation biology. Oikos 74, 349-356.
51. Wiens, J.A., 1989. Spatial ecology in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3, 385-397.
52. Wiens, J.A., 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In: Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E. (Eds.), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp. 43-67
53. Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C., Van Horne, B., Ims, R.A., 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66, 369-380.
54. Wiens, J.A., Schooley, R.L., Weeks Jr., R.D., 1997. Patchy landscapes and animal movements: do beetles percolate? Oikos 78, 257-264.
55. Willekens, F.J., 1977. Sensitivity analysis in multiregional demographic models. Environ. Plann. 9, 653-674.
56. With, K.A., Christ, T.O., 1995. Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscapes structure. Ecology 76, 2446-2459.