Relationship between multiple-locus heterozygosity and growth rate in Ostrea edulis populations

Journal of Molluscan Studies

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 319-323

  Marsic Lucic, Jasna ^a   David, Patrice ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY AND FISHERIES   (Croatia)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOZYME; BIVALVE; GROWTH RATE; HETEROZYGOSITY;

BIVALVIA; OSTREA; OSTREA EDULIS; OSTREIDAE;

EID: 0346735419     PISSN: 02601230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/mollus/69.4.319     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ALVAREZ, G., ZAPATA, C., AMARO, R. & GUERRA, A. 1989. Multilocus heterozygosity at protein loci and fitness in the European oyster, Ostrea edulis. Heredity, 60: 359-372.
2. BEAUMONT, A.R., BEVERIDGE, C.M. & BUDD, M.D. 1983. Selection and heterozygosity within single families of the mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology Letters, 4: 151-161.
3. BEAUMONT, A.R., GOSLING, E.M., BEVERIDGE, C.M., BUDD, M.D. & BURNELL, G.M. 1985. Studies on the heterozygosity and size in the scallop, Pecten maximus. In: Proceedings of the XIX European Marine Biology Symposium (P.E. Gibbs, ed.), 443-454. Cambridge University Press.
4. BRITTEN, H.B. 1996. Meta-analysis of the association between multilocus heterozygosity and fitness. Evolution, 50: 2158-2164.
5. BUSH, R.M., SMOUSE, P.E. & LEDIG, F.T. 1987. The fitness consequences of multiple locus heterozygosity: the relationship between heterozygosity and growth rate in pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill). Evolution, 41: 787-798.
6. DAVID, P. 1997. Modeling the genetic basis of heterosis: tests of alternative hypothesis. Evolution, 51: 1049-1057.
7. DAVID, P. 1998. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity, 80: 531-537.
8. DAVID, P., DELAY, B., BERTHOU, P. & JARNE, P. 1995. Alternative models for allozyme-associated heterosis in the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis. Genetics, 139: 1719-1726.
9. DAVID, P., DELAY, B. & JARNE, P. 1997. Heterozygosity and growth in the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis: testing alternative hypotheses. Genetic Resources, Cambridge, 70: 215-223.
10. DIEHL, W.J. & KOEHN, R.K. 1985. Multiple-locus heterozygosity, mortality and growth in a cohort of Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 88: 265-271.
11. FOLTZ, D.W. & ZOUROS, E. 1984. Enzyme heterozygosity in the scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin) in relation to age and size. Marine Biology Letters, 5: 255-263.
12. GAFFNEY, P.M. 1990. Enzyme heterozygosity, growth rate and viability in Mytilus edulis: another look. Evolution, 44: 204-210.
13. GAFFNEY, P.M. & SCOTT, T.M. 1984. Genetic heterozygosity and production traits in natural and hatchery populations of bivalves. Aquaculture, 42: 289-302.
14. GAFFNEY, P.M., SCOTT, T.M., KOEHN, R.K. & DIEHL, W.J. 1990. Interrelationships of heterozygosity, growth rate and heterozygosity deficiences in the cootclam Mulinia lateralis. Genetics, 124: 687-699.
15. GOUDET, J. 1994. FSTAT, a program to calculate Weir and Cockerham's (1984) estimators of F-statistics (version 1.0). Institute of Ecology, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.
16. GREEN, R.H., SINGH, S.M., HICKS, B. & MCCUAIG, J. 1983. An arctic intertidal population of Macoma balthica (Mollusca, Pelecypoda): genotypic and phenotypic components of population structure. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 40: 1360-1371.
17. HOULE, D. 1994. Adaptive distance and the genetic basis of heterosis. Evolution, 48: 1410-1417.
18. KOEHN, R.K., DIEHL, W.J., & SCOTT, T.M. 1988. The differential contribution by individual enzymes of glycolysis and protein catabolism to the relationship between heterozygosity and growth rate in the coot clam Mulinia lateralis. Genetics, 118: 121-130.
19. KOEHN, R.K. & GAFFNEY, P.M. 1984. Genetic heterozygosity and growth rate in Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 82: 1-7.
20. LYNCH, M., & WALSH, J.B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
21. PASTEUR, N., PASTEUR, G., BONHOMME, F., CATALAN, J. & BRITTON-DAVIDIAN, J. 1987. Manuel technique de Genetique par Electrophvrèse des protéines. Lavoisier, Paris.
22. RAYMOND, M. & ROUSSET, F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86: 248-249.
23. SAAVEDRA, C. & QUERRA, A. 1996. Allozyme heterozygosity and fitness traits in a cultivated population of the European oyster Ostrea edulis. Aquaculture, 139: 203-224.
24. SINGH, S.M. 1978. A model for the maintenance of genetic variability and its utilization in genetic improvement of oyster populations. Aquaculture, 15: 289-295.
25. SINGH, S.M. & ZOUROS, E. 1981. Genetics of growth rate in oysters and its implications for aquaculture. Canadian Journal of Cytology, 23: 119-130.
26. SMOUSE, P.E. 1986. The fitness consequences of multiple-locus heterozygosity under the multiplicative overdominance and inbreeding depression model. Evolution, 40: 946-957.
27. WEIR, B.S. & COCKERHAM, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358-1370.
28. ZOUROS, E. 1987. On the relations between heterozygosity and heterosis: an evaluation of the evidence from marine molluscs. Isozymes, 15: 255-270.
29. ZOUROS, E. 1993. Associative overdominance: evaluating the effects of inbreeding and linkage disequilibrium. Genetica, 89: 35-46.
30. ZOUROS, E. & POGSON, G.H. 1994. The present status of the relationship between heterozygosity and heteroses. In: Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms (A. R. Beaumont, ed.), 135-146. Chapman & Hall, London.
31. ZOUROS, E., ROMERO-DOREY, M. & MALLET, A.L. 1988. Heterozygosity and growth rate in marine bivalves: further data and possible explanations. Evolution, 42: 1332-1341.
32. ZOUROS, E., SINGH, S.M., FOLTZ, D.W. & MALLET, A.L. 1983. Post-settlement viability in the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica): an overdominance phenotype. Genetic Resources, 41: 259-270.
33. ZOUROS, E., SINGH, S.M. & MILES, H.E. 1980. Growth rate in oysters: an overdominant phenotype and its possible explanations. Evolution, 34: 856-867.