Twins and Friendship

Twin Research

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 532-535

  Thorpe, Karen ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; FRIENDSHIP; GENETICS; HUMAN; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TWINS; WELLBEING;

FRIENDS; HUMANS; TWIN STUDIES; TWINS; TWINS, DIZYGOTIC; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 0346733170     PISSN: 13690523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/136905203322686545     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Aboud, F. E., & Mendelson, M. J. (1996). Determinants of friendship selection and quality: Developmental perspectives. In W. N. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 87-112). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Berndt, T. J. (1996). Exploring the effects of friendship quality on social development. In W. N. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F. & Hartup, W. W. (1996). Friendship: Its significance in childhood and adolescence: Introduction and comment. In W. N. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227-241.
5. Gau, J. S., Silberg, J. L., Ericson, M. T., & Hewitt, J. K. (1992). Acta Geneticae et Gemellologiae, 41, 53-63.
6. Gjone, H., & Novik, T. S. (1995). Parent ratings or behaviour problems: A twin and general population comparison. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 1213-1224.
7. Hartup, W. W. (2000). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. In W. Craig (Ed.), Childhood social development. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
8. Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social and personality development (pp. 275-385). New York: John Wiley.
9. Hartup, W.W., & Van Lieshout, C. F. M. (1995). Personality development in social context. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 655-687.
10. Kandel, D. B. (1978a). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427-436.
11. Kandel, D. (1978b). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306-312.
12. Koch, H. (1966). Twins and twin relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Ladd, G. W. (1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children's early school adjustment? Child Development, 61, 1081-1090.
14. Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1996). Friendship quality as a predictor of children's early school adjustment. Child Development, 67, 1103-1118.
15. Levy, F., Hay, D., McLaughlin, M., Wood, C., & Waldman, I. (1996). Twin sibling differences in parental reports of ADHD, speech, reading and behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 37(5), 569-578.
16. Lytton, H., Watts. D., & Dunn, B. E. (1987). Twin -singleton differences in verbal ability: Where do they stem from? Intelligence, 11, 359-369.
17. Parker, J. G. A. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-382.
18. Preedy, P. (2001). Are multiple birth children different from singletons? Meeting the educational needs of multiple birth children upon school entry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University Of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
19. Pulkkinen, L., Vaalamo, I., Hietala, R., Kaprio, J., & Rose, R. J. (2003). Peer reports of adaptive behaviour in twins and singletons: Is twinship a risk or an advantage? Twin Research, 6(2), 106-118.
20. Rose, R. J. (2002). How do adolescents select their friends? A behavior-genetic perspective. In L. Pulkkinen, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Paths to successful development: Personality in the life course (pp. 106-125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Rutter, M., & Redshaw, J. (1991). Annotation: Growing up as a twin: Twin-singleton differences in psychological development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 885-895.
22. Rutter, M., Thorpe, K., Greenwood, R., Northstone, K., & Golding, J. (2003). Twins as a natural experiment to study the causes of mild language delay I: Design; twin-singleton differences in language and obstetric risks. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 44(3), 326-341.
23. Simonoff, E. (1992). A comparison of twins and singletons with child psychiatric disorders: An item sheet study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1319-1332.
24. Thorpe, K. J., Golding, J., MacGillivray, I., & Greenwood, R. (1991). Comparison of the prevalence of depression in mothers of twins and mothers of singletons. British Medical Journal 302, 875-878.
25. Thorpe, K., Rutter, M., & Greenwood, R. (2003). Twins as a natural experiment to study the causes of mild language delay II: Family interaction risk factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(3), 342-355.
26. Van den Oord, E. J., Koot, H. M., Boomsma, D. I., Verhulst, F. C., & Orlebeke, J. F. (1995). A twin-singleton comparison of problem behaviour in 2-3 year olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 232-245.
27. Vaughn, B., Azria, M. R., Krzysik, L., Caya, L. R., Bost, K. K., Newell, W., et al. (2000). Friendship and social competence in a sample of pre-school children attending Head Start. Developmental Psychology, 36, 326-328.
28. Vaughn, B., Colvin, T. N., Azria, M. R., Caya, L., & Krzysik, L. (2001). Dyadiac analyses of friendship in a sample of preschool-age children attending Head Start: Correspondence among measures and implications for social competence. Child Development, 72(3), 862-878.