Mentor preparation: Reasons for undertaking the course and expectations of the candidates

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 30-40

  Watson, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ENB 998; Mentor; Mentor preparation; Mentorship; Motivation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MOTIVATION; NURSING EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TEACHER;

EID: 0346656730     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00119-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Andrews, M., Wallis, M., 1999. Mentorship in nursing: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 29 (1), 201-207.
2. Atkins, S., Williams, A., 1995. Registered nurses' experiences of mentoring undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21 (5), 1006-1015.
3. Bedford, H., Phillips, T., Robinson, J., Schostak, J., 1993. Assessing competencies in nursing and midwifery education: final report: a joint project between the School of Education. University of East Anglia, The Suffolk and Great Yarmouth College of Nursing and Midwifery and the Suffolk College of Higher and Further Education, English National Board, London.
4. Duffy, K., Docherty, C., Cardnuff, L., White, M., Winters, G., Greig, J., 2000. The nurse lecturer's role in mentoring the mentors. Nursing Standard 15 (6), 35-38.
5. English National Board and Department of Health, 2001. Placements in focus: guidance for education in practice for health care professionals. English National Board and Department of Health, London.
6. English National Board and Department of Health, 2001. Preparation of mentors and teachers: a new framework for guidance. English National Board and Department of Health, London.
7. Jinks, A.M., Williams, R.H., 1994. Evaluation of a community staff preparation strategy for the teaching, assessing and mentorship of Project 2000 diploma students. Nurse Education Today 14 (1), 44-51.
8. Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2002. Standards for the preparation of teachers of nursing and midwifery. Nursing and Midwifery Council, London.
9. Polit, D. F., Beck, C.T., Hungler, B. P., 2001. Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods Appraisal and Utilization, fifth ed. Lippincott, Philadelphia.
10. Spouse, J., 1998. Network. Learning to nurse through legitimate peripheral participation including commentary by Maslin-Prothero S. Nurse Education Today 18 (5), 345-352.
11. SPSS Inc., 1999. SPSS for Windows, SPSS Inc.
12. Twinn, S., Davies, S., 1996. The supervision of Project 2000 students in the clinical setting: issues and implications for practitioners. Journal of Clinical Nursing 5 (3), 177-183.
13. Twinn, S.F., 1995. Creating reality or contributing to confusion. An exploratory study of client participation in student learning. Nurse Education Today 15 (4), 291-297.
14. UKCC, 1990. Post registration education and practice. United Kingdon Central Council, London.
15. United Kingdom Central Council, 2000. Standards for the preparation of teachers of nursing, midwifery and health visiting. United Kingdom Central Council, London.
16. Watson, S., 2000. The support that mentors receive in the clinical setting. Nurse Education Today 20 (7), 585-592.