Working the planning table: The political practice of adult education

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 5-21

  Cervero, Ronald M ^a   Wilson, Arthur L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346529268     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0158037980200101     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cervero, R.M., and Wilson, A.W., 1994a. Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Cervero, R.M., and Wilson, A.L., 1994b. The politics of responsibility: A theory of program planning practice for adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 45: 249–268.
3. Cervero, R.M., and Wilson, A.W., eds. 1996. What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Elgstrom, O., and Riis, U., 1992. Framed negotiations and negotiated frames. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36(2): 99–120.
5. Forester, J., 1989. Planning in the face of power, Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Giddens, A., 1979. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis, Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Isaac, J., 1987. Power and Marxist theory: A realist view, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Mills, D.P., Cervero, R.M., Langone, C.A., and Wilson, A.L., 1995. The impact of interests, power relationships, and organizational structure on program planning practice: A case study. Adult Education Quarterly, 46: 1–16.
9. Pinar, W.F., and Bowers, C.A., 1992. “ Politics of curriculum: Origins, controversies, and significance of critical perspectives ”. In Review of research in education, Edited by: Grant, G., Vol. 18, 163–190. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
10. Rees, E.F., Cervero, R.M., Moshi, L., and Wilson, A.L., 1997. Language, power, and the construction of adult education programs. Adult Education Quarterly, 47: 63–77.
11. Sork, T., 1996. “ Negotiating power and interests in planning: A critical perspective ”. In What really matters in adult education program planning: Lessons in negotiating power and interests, Edited by: Cervero, R.M., and Wilson, A.L., 81–90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Wilson, A.L., and Cervero, R.M., 1996. Who sits at the planning table: Ethics and planning practice. Adult Learning, 8(2): 20–22.
13. Wilson, A.L., and Cervero, R.M., 1997. The song remains the same: The selective tradition of technical rationality in adult education program planning theory. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 16: 84–108.