Dynamic Ethics

Journal of Value Inquiry

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 13-34

  Van Der Burg, Wibren ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346492825     PISSN: 00225363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024009125065     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Wibren van der Burg, "Bioethics and Law: A Developmental Perspective," Bioethics 11 (1997) and "Two Models of Law and Morality," Associations 3 (1999).
2. See Brian Barry, "John Rawls and the Search for Stability," Ethics 105 (1995).
3. See Brian Barry, "John Rawls and the Search for Stability," Ethics 105 (1995).
4. See John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971).
5. See Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
6. See Norman Daniels, Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996); Michael DePaul, Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry (London: Routledge, 1993); Wibren van der Burg and Theo van Willigenburg, eds., Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998).
7. See Norman Daniels, Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996); Michael DePaul, Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry (London: Routledge, 1993); Wibren van der Burg and Theo van Willigenburg, eds., Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998).
8. See Norman Daniels, Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996); Michael DePaul, Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry (London: Routledge, 1993); Wibren van der Burg and Theo van Willigenburg, eds., Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998).
9. Rawls, op. cit., p. 51 and John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 97.
10. Rawls, op. cit., p. 51 and John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 97.
11. See Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 160.
12. See John Rawls, "Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory," Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980), in John Rawls, Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 303-359. See also Mark S. Cladis, "Wittgenstein, Rawls and Conservatism," Philosophy & Social Criticism 20 (1994).
13. See John Rawls, "Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory," Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980), in John Rawls, Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 303-359. See also Mark S. Cladis, "Wittgenstein, Rawls and Conservatism," Philosophy & Social Criticism 20 (1994).
14. See John Rawls, "Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory," Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980), in John Rawls, Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 303-359. See also Mark S. Cladis, "Wittgenstein, Rawls and Conservatism," Philosophy & Social Criticism 20 (1994).
15. See Dworkin, op. cit., p. 162.
16. Dworkin, op. cit., p. 160. Also see Kai Nielsen, "How to Proceed in Social Philosophy: Contextualist Justice and Wide Reflective Equilibrium," Queen's Law Journal 20 (1994), p. 89.
17. Dworkin, op. cit., p. 160. Also see Kai Nielsen, "How to Proceed in Social Philosophy: Contextualist Justice and Wide Reflective Equilibrium," Queen's Law Journal 20 (1994), p. 89.
18. See F.W.A. Brom, "Developing Public Morality," in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., p. 193.
19. John Rawls, Political Liberalism, p. 97.
20. See Robert Heeger, "Views of Life in New Situations: Moral Thinking about Animal Experiments and Biotechnology," in G. van den Brink, L. van den Brom and M. Sarot, eds., Christian Faith and Philosophical Theology (Kampen, The Netherlands: Kok Pharos, 1992), pp. 92-102 and Marcel Verweij, "Moral Principles: Authoritative Norms or Flexible Guidelines?" in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 29-40.
21. See Robert Heeger, "Views of Life in New Situations: Moral Thinking about Animal Experiments and Biotechnology," in G. van den Brink, L. van den Brom and M. Sarot, eds., Christian Faith and Philosophical Theology (Kampen, The Netherlands: Kok Pharos, 1992), pp. 92-102 and Marcel Verweij, "Moral Principles: Authoritative Norms or Flexible Guidelines?" in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 29-40.
22. See Thomas Magnell, "The Mistake of the Century and Moral Deliberation," Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (2000).
23. See Brom, op. cit.
24. See Wibren van der Burg, "The Importance of Ideals," Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (1997) and "Ideals and Ideal Theory: The Problem of Methodological Conservatism," in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 89-99. Also see Lisa Bellantoni, Moral Progress: A Process Critique of MacIntyre (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 2000).
25. See Wibren van der Burg, "The Importance of Ideals," Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (1997) and "Ideals and Ideal Theory: The Problem of Methodological Conservatism," in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 89-99. Also see Lisa Bellantoni, Moral Progress: A Process Critique of MacIntyre (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 2000).
26. See Wibren van der Burg, "The Importance of Ideals," Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (1997) and "Ideals and Ideal Theory: The Problem of Methodological Conservatism," in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 89-99. Also see Lisa Bellantoni, Moral Progress: A Process Critique of MacIntyre (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 2000).
27. See Brian Walker, "John Rawls, Michail Bakhtin, and the Praxis of Toleration," Political Theory 23 (1995), p. 11.
28. Nicholas Rescher, Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993) p. 9. See also Brom, op. cit., p. 201.
29. Nicholas Rescher, Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993) p. 9. See also Brom, op. cit., p. 201.
30. See Depaul op. cit. Also see Catherine Z. Elgin, Considered Judgment (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996).
31. See Depaul op. cit. Also see Catherine Z. Elgin, Considered Judgment (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996).
32. See Martha Nussbaum, Poetic Justice. The Literary Imagination and the Public Life (Boston: Beacon Press, 1995).
33. See Iris Marion Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990).
34. See DePaul, op. cit.; Eberhard Herrmann, "Rationality, Warrant and Reflective Equilibrium," in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 103-114.
35. See DePaul, op. cit.; Eberhard Herrmann, "Rationality, Warrant and Reflective Equilibrium," in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 103-114.
36. M. Verkerk, "The Thinker and the Thinking Process: A Feminist Perspective on the Moral Faculty," in Van der Burg and Van Willigenburg, eds., op. cit., pp. 115-126.
37. John Rawls, Political Liberalism, p. 97 and "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997), in John Rawls, ed., Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 473-615; Daniels, op. cit.
38. John Rawls, Political Liberalism, p. 97 and "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997), in John Rawls, ed., Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 473-615; Daniels, op. cit.
39. John Rawls, Political Liberalism, p. 97 and "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997), in John Rawls, ed., Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 473-615; Daniels, op. cit.
40. John Rawls, Political Liberalism, p. 97 and "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997), in John Rawls, ed., Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 473-615; Daniels, op. cit.
41. See John Rawls, "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," p. 779.
42. See John Rawls, op. cit., p. 783-784.
43. I would like to thank Norman Daniels for drawing my attention to this possible reply.
44. Earlier versions and parts of this paper have been presented at the universities of Utrecht, Tilburg, Linköping, Amsterdam and Zürich, and at the Netherlands School for Research in Practical Philosophy. Special thanks for their helpful comments are due to Wouter de Been, Ton van den Beld, Bert van den Brink, Jos Kole, Pieter Pekelharing, Juha Räikkä, Marcel Verweij, Theo van Willigenburg and Thomas Magnell. The research for this paper was partly supported by a Pionier-grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).