A logical analysis computerized adaptive test based on automatic item generation;Un test adaptativo informatizado de análisis lógico basado en la generación automática de items

Psicothema

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 709-716

  Revuelta, Javier ^a   Ponsoda, Vicente ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347894067     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Assessment Systems Corporation (1994). User's manual for the MicroCAT Testing System, Version 3.5. St. Paul, NMN: Author.
2. Bejar, I. 1980. A procedure for investigating the unidimensionality of achievement tests based on item parameters estimates. Journal of Educational Measurement. 17, 283-296.
3. Bejar, I. 1993. A Generative Approach to Psychological and Educational Measurement. En N. Frederiksen, J. R. Mislevy, R.J. y. Bejar I. (eds.). Test Tlieory for a New Generation of Tests. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Brookshear, J. G. 1989. Theory of Computation. Formal Languages, Automata and Complexity. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. Reedwood City. CAL.
5. Collis, J. M; Tapsfield, P. G. C; Irvine, S. H; Dann, P. L. and Wright D. 1995. The British Army Recruit Battery Goes Operational: from Theory to Practice in Computer-Based Testing Using Item-Generation Techniques. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. Vol 3. No 2. pp 96-104.
6. Embretson, S. E. 1994 . Applications of Cognitive Design Systems to Test Development. En C. R. Reynolds, Cognitive Assessment. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Ed Plenum Press. New York.
7. Fischer, G. H. y Molenaar, I. W. 1995. Rasch Models. Foundations, Recent Developments and Applications. Ed: Springer-Verlas. New York.
8. Fischer, G. H. y Pendl, P. 1980. Individualized Testing on the Basis of the Dichotomous Rasch Model. En: L. J. van der Kamp, W. F. Langerak y D. N. de Gruijter (eds.), Psychometrics for Educational Debates. Ed: John Wiley & Sons. New York.
9. Fischer G.H. y Ponocny-Seliger, E. (1997). LPCM-WIN Program. IEE ProGAMMA. Groningen.
10. Hambleton, R. K. y Swaminathan. 1985. Item Response Theory. Principles and Applications. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing. Boston. MA.
11. Hornke, L. F. y Habon, M. W. 1986. Rule Based Item Bank Construction and Evaluation with the Linear Logistic Framework. Applied Psychological Measurement. Vol 10. No 4. pp 369-380.
12. Lord, F. M. 1980. Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.
13. SHL. 1996. DA5: Diagramas Codificados. SHL, Psicólogos Organizacionales. Madrid.
14. Snow R. and Lohman D. 1993. Cognitive Psychology, New Test Design and New Test Theory: An Introduction. In N. Frederiksen, J. R. Mislevy e I. I. Bejar (eds. ), Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.
15. Wainer, H. 1990. Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.
16. Wright, B. D. y Stone, M. H. 1979. Best test design. Mesa Press. Chicago.