Diurnal control of the drought-inducible putative histone H1 gene in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. L.)

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 49, Issue 323, 1998, Pages 945-952

  Corlett, Janet E ^a   Wilkinson, Sally ^b   Thompson, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diurnal trends; Histone H1; LcyP2; Le20; Tomato

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0031811208     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/49.323.945     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson SL, Teakle GR, Martino-Catt SJ, Kay SA. 1994. Circadian clock- and phytochrorne-regulated transcription is conferred by a 78 bp cis-acting domain of the Arabidopsis CAB2 promoter. The Plant Journal 6, 457-70.
2. Ascenzi R, Gantt JS. 1997. A drought-stress-inducible histone gene in Arabidopsis thaliana is a member of a distinct class of plant linker histone variants. Plant Molecular Biology 34, 629-41.
3. Bouvet P, Dimitrov S, Wolffe AP. 1994. Specific regulation of Xenopus chromosomal 5S rRNA gene transcription in vivo by histone H1. Genes and Development 8, 1147-59.
4. Cohen A, Bray EA. 1990. Characterization of three mRNAs that accumulate in wilted tomato leaves in response to elevated levels of endogenous abscisic acid. Planta 182, 27-33.
5. Cohen A, Plant AL, Moses MS, Bray EA. 1991. Organ-specific and environmentally regulated expression of two abscisic acid-induced genes of tomato. Plant Physiology 97, 1367-74.
6. Cornish K, Zeevaart JAD. 1988. Phenotypic expression of wild-type tomato and three wilty mutants in relation to abscisic acid accumulation in roots and leaflets of reciprocal grafts. Plant Physiology 87, 190-4.
7. Demming B, Winter K. 1988. Characteristics of three components of non-photochemical quenching and their response to photoinhibition. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15, 163-77.
8. Freeden AL, Hennessey TL, Field CB. 1991. Biochemical correlates of the circadian rhythm in photosynthesis in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiology 97, 415-19.
9. Hennessey TL, Freeden AL, Field CB. 1993. Environmental effects on circadian rhythms in photosynthesis and stomatal opening. Planta 189, 369-76.
10. Jones JT, Mullet JE. 1995. A salt- and dehydration-inducible pea gene, Cyp15a, encodes a cell-wall protein with sequence similarity to cysteine proteases. Plant Molecular Biology 28, 1055-65.
11. Kahn TL, Fender SE, Bray EA, O'Connell MA. 1993. Characterization of expression of drought- and abscisic acid-regulated tomato genes in the drought-resistant species Lycopersicon pennellii. Plant Physiology 103, 597-605.
12. Kellmann JW, Merforth N, Wiese M, Pichersky E, Piechulla B. 1993. Concerted circadian transcript level oscillations of nineteen Lhcalb (cab) genes in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Molecular and General Genetics 237, 439-48.
13. Linthorst HJM, van der Does C, Brederode F, Bol JF. 1993. Circadian expression and induction by wounding of tobacco genes for cysteine proteinase. Plant Molecular Biology 21, 685-94.
14. Malone M. 1992. Kinetics of wound-induced hydraulic signals and variation potentials in wheat seedlings. Planta 187, 505-10.
15. Malone M, PalumboL, Boari F, Monteleon M, Jones HG. 1994. The relationship betweeen wound-induced proteinase inhibitors and hydraulic signals in tornatp seedlings. Plant, Cell and Enivronment 17, 81-7.
16. Mansfield TA, Snaith PJ. 1984. Circadian rhythms. In: Wilkins MB, ed. Advanced plant physiology. London: Pitman, 201-18.
17. 2-rapid down regulation of RuBisCo small subunit transcripts, but not of the large subunit transcripts. Journal of Plant Physiology 143, 306-312.
18. 2? Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 913-23.
19. Paranjape SM, Kamakaka RT, Kadonaga JT. 1994. Role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Annual Review of Biochemistry 63, 265-97.
20. Pearce B, Brown M, Grange B. 1992. A method for assessing diurnal changes in concentrations of sugars and malate in the pericarp of growing tomato fruit. Journal of Horticultural Science 67, 231-7.
21. Pichersky E, Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD, Breidenbach RB, Kausch AP, Cashmore AR. 1985. Molecular characterization and genetic-mapping of 2 clusters of genes encoding chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Gene 40, 247-58.
22. Piechulla B- 1989. Changes of the diurnal and circadian (endogeriousV mRNA oscillations of the chlorophyll a/b binding protein in tomato leaves during altered day/night (light/dark) regimes. Plant Molecular Biology 12, 317-27.
23. Piechulla B. 1993. 'Circadian clock' directs the expression of plant genes. Plant Molecular Biology 22, 533-42.
24. Quarrie SA, Whitford PN, Appleford NEJ, Wang TL, Cook SK, Henson IE, Loveys BR. 1988. A monoclonal antibody to (S)-abscisic acid: is characterisation and use in radioimmunoassay for measuring abscisic acid in crude extracts of cereals and lupin leaves. Planta 173, 330-9.
25. Rocsi M, Iusem ND. 1994. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) genomic clone homologous to a gene encoding an abscisic acid-induced protein. Plant Physiology 104, 1073-4.
26. Sheen J. 1990. Metabolite repression of transcription in higher plants. The Plant Cell 2, 1027-38.
27. Shen X, Gorovsky MA. 1996. Linker histone HI regulates specific gene expression but not global transcription in vivo. Cell 86, 475-83.
28. Szekeres M, Haizel T, Adam E, Nagy F. 1995. Molecular characterization and expression of a tobacco H1 cDNA. Plant Molecular Biology 27, 597-605.
29. Thompson AJ, Corlett JE. 1995. mRNA levels of four tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, L.) genes related to fluctuating plant and soil water status. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 773-80.
30. Wei T, O'Connell MA. 1996. Structure and characterization of a putative drought-induced H1 histone gene. Plant Molecular Biology 30, 255-68.
31. Workman JL, Buckman AR. 1993. Multiple functions of nucleosomes and regulatory factors in transcription. Trends in Biochemical Science 18, 90-5.
32. Zlatanova J, Van Holde K. 1992. Histone H1 and transcription: still an enigma? Journal of Cell Science 103, 889-95.