Design of gates for quantum computation: The not gate

International Journal of Modern Physics B

Volumn 11, Issue 18, 1997, Pages 2207-2215

  Mozyrsky, Dima ^a   Privman, Vladimir ^a   Hotaling, Steven P ^b  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346355765     PISSN: 02179792     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0217979297001143     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. The following are general reviews: C. H. Bennett, Physics Today, October 1995, p. 24; D. Deutsch, Physics World, June 1992, p. 57; D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995); A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996); S. Lloyd, Science 261, 1563 (1993); B. Schwarzschild. Physics Today, March 1996, p. 1.
2. The following are general reviews: C. H. Bennett, Physics Today, October 1995, p. 24; D. Deutsch, Physics World, June 1992, p. 57; D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995); A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996); S. Lloyd, Science 261, 1563 (1993); B. Schwarzschild. Physics Today, March 1996, p. 1.
3. The following are general reviews: C. H. Bennett, Physics Today, October 1995, p. 24; D. Deutsch, Physics World, June 1992, p. 57; D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995); A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996); S. Lloyd, Science 261, 1563 (1993); B. Schwarzschild. Physics Today, March 1996, p. 1.
4. The following are general reviews: C. H. Bennett, Physics Today, October 1995, p. 24; D. Deutsch, Physics World, June 1992, p. 57; D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995); A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996); S. Lloyd, Science 261, 1563 (1993); B. Schwarzschild. Physics Today, March 1996, p. 1.
5. The following are general reviews: C. H. Bennett, Physics Today, October 1995, p. 24; D. Deutsch, Physics World, June 1992, p. 57; D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995); A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996); S. Lloyd, Science 261, 1563 (1993); B. Schwarzschild. Physics Today, March 1996, p. 1.
6. The following are general reviews: C. H. Bennett, Physics Today, October 1995, p. 24; D. Deutsch, Physics World, June 1992, p. 57; D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995); A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996); S. Lloyd, Science 261, 1563 (1993); B. Schwarzschild. Physics Today, March 1996, p. 1.
7. Recent literature includes A. Barenco, C. H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D. P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J. A. Smolin and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A52, 3457 (1995); D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A51, 1015 (1995); S. Lloyd. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995); A. Barenco, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A449, 679 (1995).
8. Recent literature includes A. Barenco, C. H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D. P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J. A. Smolin and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A52, 3457 (1995); D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A51, 1015 (1995); S. Lloyd. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995); A. Barenco, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A449, 679 (1995).
9. Recent literature includes A. Barenco, C. H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D. P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J. A. Smolin and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A52, 3457 (1995); D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A51, 1015 (1995); S. Lloyd. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995); A. Barenco, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A449, 679 (1995).
10. Recent literature includes A. Barenco, C. H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D. P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J. A. Smolin and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A52, 3457 (1995); D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A51, 1015 (1995); S. Lloyd. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995); A. Barenco, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A449, 679 (1995).
11. For a recent review see D. P. DiVincenzo, Topics in Quantum Computers (preprint), as well as Refs. 1.
12. C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995); Q. Turchette, C. Hood, W. Lange. H. Mabushi and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995); see also Refs. 1. and A. Steane. The Ion Trap Quantum Information Processor (preprint), as well as N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997).
13. C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995); Q. Turchette, C. Hood, W. Lange. H. Mabushi and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995); see also Refs. 1. and A. Steane. The Ion Trap Quantum Information Processor (preprint), as well as N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997).
14. C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995); Q. Turchette, C. Hood, W. Lange. H. Mabushi and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995); see also Refs. 1. and A. Steane. The Ion Trap Quantum Information Processor (preprint), as well as N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997).
15. C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995); Q. Turchette, C. Hood, W. Lange. H. Mabushi and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995); see also Refs. 1. and A. Steane. The Ion Trap Quantum Information Processor (preprint), as well as N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997).
16. An instructive survey of these issues and references to literature can be found in the article by R. Landauer, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A353. 367 (1995): see also S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Physics Today, August 1996. p. 51.
17. An instructive survey of these issues and references to literature can be found in the article by R. Landauer, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A353. 367 (1995): see also S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Physics Today, August 1996. p. 51.
18. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. A32, 3266 (1985); see also P. Benioff, J. Stat. Phys. 29, 515 (1982).
19. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. A32, 3266 (1985); see also P. Benioff, J. Stat. Phys. 29, 515 (1982).
20. Details of a similar study for the three-spin XOR gate have been reported by D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and S. P. Hotaling, Design of Gates for Quantum Computation: the three-spin XOR in terms of two-spin interactions (preprint) Int. J. Mod. Phys. B (submitted). The XOR gate can be also realized in two-spin systems: J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995); I. L. Chuang and Y. Yamamoto, The Persistent Qubit (preprint); D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and M. Hillery, Phys. Lett. A226, 253 (1997).
21. Details of a similar study for the three-spin XOR gate have been reported by D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and S. P. Hotaling, Design of Gates for Quantum Computation: the three-spin XOR in terms of two-spin interactions (preprint) Int. J. Mod. Phys. B (submitted). The XOR gate can be also realized in two-spin systems: J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995); I. L. Chuang and Y. Yamamoto, The Persistent Qubit (preprint); D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and M. Hillery, Phys. Lett. A226, 253 (1997).
22. Details of a similar study for the three-spin XOR gate have been reported by D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and S. P. Hotaling, Design of Gates for Quantum Computation: the three-spin XOR in terms of two-spin interactions (preprint) Int. J. Mod. Phys. B (submitted). The XOR gate can be also realized in two-spin systems: J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995); I. L. Chuang and Y. Yamamoto, The Persistent Qubit (preprint); D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and M. Hillery, Phys. Lett. A226, 253 (1997).
23. Details of a similar study for the three-spin XOR gate have been reported by D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and S. P. Hotaling, Design of Gates for Quantum Computation: the three-spin XOR in terms of two-spin interactions (preprint) Int. J. Mod. Phys. B (submitted). The XOR gate can be also realized in two-spin systems: J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995); I. L. Chuang and Y. Yamamoto, The Persistent Qubit (preprint); D. Mozyrsky, V. Privman and M. Hillery, Phys. Lett. A226, 253 (1997).