Teachers' Conceptions of Gifted and Talented Young Children

High Ability Studies

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 183-196

  Lee, Libby ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346341107     PISSN: 13598139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1359813990100205     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BUSSE, T. V., DAHME, G., WAGNER, H., & WIECZERKOWSKI, W. (1986). Teacher perceptions of highly gifted students in the United States and West Germany. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(2), pp. 55-60.
2. COPENHAVER, R. W., & MCINTYRE, D. J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 151-153.
3. CROMBIE, G., BOUFFARD-BOUCHARD, T., & SCHNEIDER, B. H. (1992). Gifted programs: Gender differences in referral and enrollment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 213-214.
4. FENNEMA, E. (1980). Sex related differences in mathematics achievement: Where and why? In L.H. FOX, L. BRODY & D. TOBIN (Eds.), Women and the mathematical mystique: Proceedings of the eighth annual Hyman Blumberg symposium on research in early childhood education (pp. 76-93). Baltimore, MD: John's Hopkins University Press.
5. FREEMAN, J. (1996). Highly able girls and boys. Northampton, UK: The National Association for Able Children in Education.
6. GAGNÉ, F. (1997). Critique of Morelock's (1996) definitions of giftedness and talent. Roeper Review, 20(2), 76-85.
7. GARDNER, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
8. MARTON, F. (1981). Phenomenography - describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10,177-200.
9. MCBRIDE, N. (1988). Identification of and provision for gifted and talented children in year 1-3 classrooms. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Education, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
10. OECD (1993). Education in OECD countries. A compendium of statistical information. Paris: Organisation for Economic and Co-operation Development (OECD).
11. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS. (1993). New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1993). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. PERLETH, C., LEHWALD, G., & BROWDER, C. S. (1993). Indicators of high ability in young children. In K. A. HELLER, F. J. MONKS & A. H. PASSOW (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 283-310). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
13. PERSSON, R. S. (1997). High ability in egalitarian contexts: Able children and commonsense teacher roles in the Swedish school system. Insikt 1997:3. Scientific reports from HLK. Jönköping, Sweden: Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication (HLK).
14. PERSSON, R. S. (1999). High ability, society and its future: The broader curriculum. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 8(1), 5-14.
15. PRAMLING, I. (1995). Phenomenography and practice. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 30(2), 135-148.
16. ROBINSON, N. M. (1993). Identifying and nurturing gifted, very young children. In K. A. HELLER, F. J. MONKS, & A. H. PASSOW (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 507-524). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
17. ROHRER, J. C. (1995). Primary teacher conceptions of giftedness: Image, evidence and nonevidence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(3), 269-283.
18. STERNBERG, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. STERNBERG, R. J. (1991). Giftedness according to the triarchic theory of human intelligence. In N. COLANGELO & G. DAVIS (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 45-54). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
20. STERNBERG, R. J. (1993). Procedures for identifying intellectual potential in the gifted: a perspective on alternative "Metaphors of Mind". In K. A. HELLER, F. J. MONKS & A. H. PASSOW (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 185-206). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
21. STERNBERG, R. J., & ZHANG, L. (1995). What do we mean by giftedness? A pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 88-94.
22. SVENSSON, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research Development, 16(2), 159-171.
23. TANNENBAUM, A. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In N. COLANGELO & G. DAVIS (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27-44). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
24. WALSH, E. (1994). Phenomenographic analysis of interview transcripts. In J. A. BOWDEN & E. WALSH (Eds.), Phenomenographic research: Variations in method; The Warburton symposium. (pp. 17-29). Melbourne, Australia, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.
25. WELLISCH, M. (1997). A pilot study: Teacher views on the concept of giftedness in the early childhood setting. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 22(2), 22-27.
26. WILLINSKY, J. M. (1990). Introduction. In J.M. WILLINSKY & J. ELLIS (Eds.), Girls, women and giftedness (pp. 1-12). Melbourne, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.
27. WOLFE, J., & SOUTHERN, W. T. (1991). Teachers' assessment of preschool and primary giftedness. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED315945].