R and D, innovation, and technological progress: A test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects;R and D, innovation, et progrès technologique: un test du cadre schumpétérien en l'absence d'effets d'échelle

Canadian Journal of Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 566-586

  Zachariadis, Marios ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; MANUFACTURING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCALE EFFECT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0346225488     PISSN: 00084085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1540-5982.t01-2-00003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt (1992) 'A model of growth through creative destruction,' Econometrica 60, 323-51
2. Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt (1998) Endogenous Growth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
3. Basu, Susanto, John Fernald, and Miles Kimball (1998) 'Are technology improvements contractionary?' International Finance Discussion Paper No. 625, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
4. Caballero, Ricardo, and Adam Jaffe (1993) 'How high are the giant's shoulders: an empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of endogenous Growth,' NBER Working Paper No. 4370
5. Coe, and Helpman (1995) 'International R&D spillovers,' European Economic Review 39, 859-87
6. Crepon, Bruno, Emmanuel Duguet, and Jacques Mairesse (1998) 'Research, innovation, and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level,' NBER Working Paper No. 6696
7. Dinopoulos, Elias, and Peter Thompson (1998) 'Schumpeterian growth without scale effects,' Journal of Economic Growth 3, 313-35
8. Dinopoulos, Elias, and Peter Thompson (2000) 'Endogenous growth in a cross-section of countries,' Journal of International Economics 51, 335-62
9. Fatas, Antonio (2000) 'Do business cycles cast long shadows? Short-run persistence and economic growth,' Journal of Economic Growth 5, 147-62
10. Geroski, Paul (1994) Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
11. Griffith, Rachel, Stephen Redding, and John Van Reenen (2000) 'Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries,' C.E.P.R. Discussion Paper No. 2457
12. Griliches, Zvi (1980a) 'R&D and the productivity slowdown,' American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 70, 343-8
13. Griliches, Zvi (1980b) 'Returns to research and development expenditures in the private sector,' in New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, ed. John Kendrick and Beatrice Vaccara (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
14. Griliches, Zvi (1990) 'Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey,' Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661-707
15. Griliches, Zvi, and Jacques Mairesse (1990) 'R&D and productivity growth: comparing Japanese and U.S. manufacturing firms,' in Productivity Growth in Japan and the U.S., ed. Charles Hulten (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
16. Howitt, Peter (1998) 'Measurement, obsolescence, and general purpose technologies' in General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, ed. Elhanan Helpman (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
17. Howitt, Peter (1999) 'Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing,' Journal of Political Economy 107, 715-30
18. Jones, Charles I. (1995a) 'Time series tests of endogenous growth,' Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 495-526
19. Jones, Charles I. (1995b) 'R&D-based models of economic growth,' Journal of Political Economy 103, 760-84
20. Jones, Charles (1999) 'Growth: with or without scale effects?' American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89, 139-44
21. Jorgenson, Dale, Frank Gollop, and Barbara Fraumeni (1987) Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
22. Kahn, J.A., and M. Ogaki (1992) 'A consistent test for the null of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root,' Economic Letters 39, 7-11
23. Keller, Wolfgang, (2002), 'Trade and the transmission of technology,' Journal of Economic Growth 7, 5-24
24. Kirchhoff, Bruce (1994) Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism (Westport, CT: Praeger)
25. Kortum, Samuel (1993) 'Equilibrium R&D and the patent-R&D ratio: U.S. evidence,' American Economic Review 83, 450-7
26. Mansfield, Edwin (1988) 'Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: a comparative study,' American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 78, 223-8
27. Nadiri, M. Ishaq (1993) 'Innovations and technological spillovers,' NBER Working Paper No. 4423
28. Ogaki, Masao (1993) 'CCR: a user guide,' Working Paper No. 349, University of Rochester
29. Pakes, Ariel, and Zvi Griliches (1980) 'Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first report,' Economics Letters 5, 377-81
30. Pakes, Ariel, and Zvi Griliches (1984) 'Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first look,' in R&D, Patents, and Productivity ed. Zvi Griliches (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
31. Park, Joon Y. (1990) 'Testing for unit roots and cointegration by variable addition,' Advances in Econometrics 8, 107-33
32. Perron, Pierre (1989) 'The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis,' Econometrica 57, 1361-401
33. Romer, Paul M. (1990) 'Endogenous technological change,' Journal of Political Economy 98, 71-102
34. Segerstrom, Paul (1998) 'Endogenous growth without scale effects,' American Economic Review 88, 1290-310
35. Segerstrom, Paul (2000) 'The long-run growth effects of R&D subsidies,' Journal of Economic Growth 5, 277-305
36. Segerstrom, Paul, T.C.A. Anant, and Elias Dinopoulos (1990) 'A Shumpeterian model of the product life cycle,' American Economic Review 80, 1077 92
37. Shea John (1998) 'What do technology shocks do?' NBER Macro Annual, 275-310
38. Zachariadis, Marios (forthcoming) 'R&D-Induced Growth in the OECD?' Review of Development Economics