3D Euler deconvolution: Theoretical basis for automatically selecting good solutions

Geophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1962-1968

  Silva, Joao B C ^a   Barbosa, Valéria C F ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

^b LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE COMPUTAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; DECONVOLUTION; GEOMAGNETISM; GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATION; INDEXING (MATERIALS WORKING); MAGNETIZATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

THREE DIMENSIONAL EULER DECONVOLUTION; EULER DECONVOLUTION; GEOPHYSICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; GEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES; HORIZONTAL COORDINATES; MAGNETIC ANOMALIES; SOURCE LOCATION; SOURCE POSITION; STRUCTURAL INDICES;

GEOPHYSICS; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY;

DATA PROCESSING; DECONVOLUTION; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD;

EID: 0346094182     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1635050     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Barbosa, V. C. F., Silva, J. B. C., and Medeiros, W. E., 1999, Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 64, 48-60.
2. Bastani, M., and Pedersen, L. B., 2001, Automatic interpretation of magnetic dike parameters using the analytical signal technique: Geophysics, 66, 551-561.
3. Debeglia, N., and Corpel, J., 1997, Automatic 3-D interpretation of potential field data using analytic signal derivatives: Geophysics, 62, 87-96.
4. Fairhead, J. D., Bennett, K. J., Gordon, D. R. H., and Huang, D., 1994, Euler: Beyond the "black box": 64th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 422-424.
5. Hsu, S., Coppens, D., and Shyu, C., 1998, Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal: Geophysics. 63, 1947-1957.
6. Hsu, S., Sibuet, J., and Shyu, C., 1996. High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique: Geophysics, 61, 373-386.
7. Le, J. W. D., and Silva, J. B. C., 1989, Discrete linear transformations of potential field data: Geophysics, 54, 497-507.
8. Mushayandebvu, M. F., van Driel, P., Reid, A. B., and Fairhead, J. D., 2001, Magnetic source parameters of two-dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 66, 814-823.
9. Peirce, J. W., Goussev, S. A., Charters, R. A., Abercrombie, H. J., and DePaoli, G. R., 1998, Intrasedimentary magnetization by vertical fluid flow and exotic geochemistry: The Leading Edge, 17, 89-92.
10. Roest, W. R., and Pilkington, M., 1993, Identifying remanent magnetization effect in magnetic data: Geophysics, 58, 653-659.
11. Silva, J. B. C., Barbosa, V. C. F., and Medeiros, W. E., 2001, Scattering, symmetry, and bias analysis of source position estimates in Euler deconvolution and its practical implications: Geophysics, 66, 1149-1156.
12. Thurston, J. B., and Smith, R. S., 1997, Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI™ method: Geophysics, 62, 807-813.
13. Thurston, J. B., Smith, R. S., and Guillon, J., 2002, A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data: Geophysics, 67, 555-561.
14. Zhang, J., 2001. An analysis of the accuracy of magnetic source-body geometry determined from the 3-D analytic signal: Geophysics, 66, 579-581.