Student Interest, Grading Leniency, and Teacher Ratings: A Conceptual Analysis

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 382-399

  Olivares, Orlando J ^a  

^a BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345978468     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1070     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrami P. C., d'Appollonia S. Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness - Generalizability of "N = 1" research: Comment on Marsh (1991). Journal of Educational Psychology. 83:1991;411-415.
2. Chacko T. I. Student ratings of instruction. A function of grading standards. Educational Research Quarterly. 8:1983;19-25.
3. Connor-Greene P. A. Assessing and promoting student learning: Blurring the line between teaching and testing. Teaching of Psychology. 27:2000;84-88.
4. Cohen, P. A. 1987, April, A critical analysis and reanalysis of the multisection validity meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
5. d'Appolonia, S, &, Abrami, P. C. 1996, Variables moderating the validity of student ratings of instruction: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 77th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
6. d'Appolonia S., Abrami P. C. Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist. 52:1997a;1198-1208.
7. d'Appolonia S., Abrami P. C. Scaling the ivory tower. II. Student ratings of instruction in North America. Psychology Teaching Review. 6:1997b;60-77.
8. Dodrill C. B. An economic method for the evaluation of general intelligence in adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 49:1981;668-673.
9. Dodrill C. B. Long term reliability of the Wonderlic Personnel Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 51:1983;316-317.
10. Dodrill C. B., Warner M. H. Further studies of the Wonderlic Personnel Test as a brief measure of intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 56:1988;145-147.
11. Feldman K. A. Grades and college students' evaluations of their courses and teachers. Research in Higher Education. 4:1976;69-111.
12. Fernandez J., Mateo M. A., Muniz J. Is there a relationship between class size and student ratings of teacher quality? Educational and Psychological Measurement. 58:1998;596-604.
13. Friedrich F., Douglass D. Ethics and the persuasive enterprise of teaching psychology. American Psychologist. 53:1998;549-562.
14. Greenwald A. G. Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist. 52:1997;1182-1186.
15. Greenwald A. G., Gillmore G. M. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist. 52:1997a;1209-1217.
16. Greenwald A. G., Gillmore G. M. No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 89:1997b;743-751.
17. st century, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5. Retrieved from World Wide Web, http:/olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa.
18. Kulik J. A., Kulik C. C. Student ratings of instruction. Teaching of Psychology. 1:1974;51-57.
19. Marsh H. W. The influence of student, course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching. American Educational Research Journal. 17:1980;219-237.
20. Marsh H. W. SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 52:1982a;77-95.
21. Marsh H. W. Factors affecting students' evaluations of the same course taught by the same instructor on different occasions. American Educational Research Journal. 19:1982b;485-497.
22. Marsh H. W. Multidimensional ratings of teaching effectiveness by students from different academic settings and their relation to student/course/instructor characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology. 75:1983;150-166.
23. Marsh H. W., Roche L. A. Making students' evaluations of teacher effectiveness effective. American Psychologist. 52:1997;1187-1197.
24. McFatter R. M. The use of structural equation models in interpreting regression equations inlcuding suppressor and enhancer variables. Applied Psychological Measurement. 3:1979;123-135.
25. McKeachie W. J. Student ratings the validity of use. American Psychologist. 52:1997;1218-1225.
26. McKeachie W. J. Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe. 65:1979;384-397.
27. McKeachie W. J. Research on teaching at the college and university level. Gage N. L. Handbook of research and teaching. 1963;1118-1172 Rand McNally, Chicago.
28. Pedhazur E. J. Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. 1997;Harcourt Brace & Company, Orlando.
29. Williams W. M., Ceci S. How'm I doing? Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses. Change. Sept.-Oct:1997;13-23.
30. Wonderlic Personnel Manual. 1992;Author, Northfield.