A French questionnaire to assess quality of life of the aphasic patient: The SIP-65;Un outil francophone de mesure de la qualité de vie de l'aphasique: Le SIP-65

Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 2-11

  Benaim C ^a   Pelissier J ^a,c   Petiot, S ^a   Bareil, M ^a   Ferrat, E ^a   Royer, E ^a   Milhau, D ^b   Herisson C ^a  

^a CHU   (France)

^b MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Quality of life; Sickness Impact Profile; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FRANCE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INJURY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SOCIAL ASPECT; STROKE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; APHASIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CRANIOCEREBRAL TRAUMA; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SAMPLING STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0345700291     PISSN: 01686054     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6054(02)00306-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahlsio B, Britton M, Murray V. Disablement and quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1984;15:886-90.
2. Bergner M, Babbit RA, Pollard WE. The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976;14:57-67.
3. Boller F, Cole M, Vrtunski PB, Patterson M, Kim Y. Paralinguistic aspects of auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain Lang 1979;7(2):164-74.
4. Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2004-10.
5. Bucquet D. Qualité de vie, santé perceptuelle: définition, concept, évaluation. In: Hérisson C, Simon L, editors. Évaluation de la qualité de vie. Paris: Masson Edit; 1993. p. 1-8.
6. Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, Gonzalez JL, Varela de Seijas E. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: experience of a stroke unit. Stroke 2000;31:2995-3000.
7. Chwalow J. Méthodologie de l'évaluation de la qualité de vie dans les essais cliniques. In: Hérisson C, Simon L, editors. Évaluation de la qualité de vie. Paris: Masson Edit; 1993. p. 22-31.
8. Darrigrand B, Mazaux JM, Dutheil S, Koleck M, Pradat-Diehl P. Évaluer la communication de la personne aphasique dans la vie quotidienne: proposition d'une échelle de communication verbale. In: Mazaux JM, Brun V, Pélissier J, editors. Aphasie 2000. Paris: Masson; 2000. p. 88-94.
9. Haan de RJ, Limburg M, Van der Meulen JH, Jacobs HM, Aaronson NK. Quality of life after stroke. Impact of stroke type and lesion location. Stroke 1995;26(3):402-8.
10. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea and Fibiger; 1972.
11. Guillemin F. Mesures de la quafité de vie génériques ou spécifiques: quel instrument choisir?. In: Hérisson C, Simon L, editors. Évaluation de la qualité de vie. Paris: Masson Edit; 1993. p. 16-21.
12. Guyatt GH, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten SJ, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review. CMAJ 1989;140:1441-8.
13. Hérisson C, Simon L. Évaluation de la qualité de vie. Problèmes en Médecine de Rééducation, Vol. 24. Paris: Masson Edit; 1993 282 p.
14. Hilari K, Byng S. Measuring quality of life in people with aphasia: the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2001;36(Suppl):86-91.
15. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2:1127-31.
16. Kwa V, Limburg M, Haan de RJ. The role of cognitive impairment in the quality of life after ischaemic stroke. J Neurol 1996;243:599-604.
17. Lefeuvre M, Delacourt A, Wyrzykowski N, Rousseaux M. Un nouveau protocole d'évaluation des troubles de la communication. In: Mazaux JM, Brun V, Pélissier J, editors. Aphasie 2000. Paris: Masson; 2000. p. 95-105.
18. Lomas J, Pickard L, Mohide A. Patient versus clinician item generation for quality of life measures. The case of language-disabled adults. Med Care 1987;25.
19. Mazaux JM, Dehail P, Brun V, Pélissier J. Les principaux tests francophones d'évaluation de l'aphasie. In: Mazaux JM, Brun V, Pélissier J, editors. Aphasie 2000. Paris: Masson Edit; 2000. p. 78-88.
20. Mazaux JM, Orgogozo JM. Échelle d'évaluation de l'aphasie. Paris: Éditions et applications psychologiques; 1982.
21. Mc Dowell I, Newell C. The theoretical and technical foundations of health measurement, in Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York, Oxford: Oxford university Press; 1987. p. 12-35.
22. Pélissier J, Enjalbert M, Papin-Saintot C, Thébault-Forcellini C, Péray P, Blard JM. Qualité de vie et handicap de communication de l'adulte hémiplégique. In: Hérisson C, Simon L, editors. Évaluation de la qualité de vie. Paris: Masson Edit; 1993. p. 148-60.
23. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Haan de RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997;28:1541-9.
24. Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:743-60.
25. van Straten A, Haan de RJ, Limburg M, Schuling J, Bossuyt PM, van der Bos GA. A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 1997;28:2155-61.
26. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Billet J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999; 30:1362-9.