3D moment invariant based morphometry

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 2879, Issue PART 2, 2003, Pages 505-512

  Mangin, J F ^a,b   Poupon, F ^a,b   Riviere D ^a,b   Cachia, A ^a,b   Collins, D L ^c   Evans, A C ^c   Regis J ^d  

^a DIF   (France)

^b Inst Federatif de Rech 49   (France)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TOPOLOGY; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

BRAIN STRUCTURES; MORPHOMETRY; SHAPE DESCRIPTORS; SPHERICAL HARMONICS; 3D COORDINATES; 3D MOMENTS; BRAIN STRUCTURE; CORTICAL SULCI; DESCRIPTORS; FIRST INVARIANTS;

PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0345686719     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39903-2_62     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. C. Brechbüler, G. Gerig, and O. Kübler. Parametrization of closed surfaces for 3D shape description. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(2):154-170, 1995.
2. G. Burel and H. Hénocq. Three-dimensional invariants and their application to object recognition. Signal Processing, 45(1): 1-22, July 1995.
3. D. L. Collins, P. Neelin, T. M. Peters et al. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized talairach space. JCAT, 18(2): 192-205, 1994.
4. A. R. Edmonds. Angular momentum in quantum mechanics. Princeton Univ. Press, 1960.
5. G.Gerig, M Styner, ME Shenton et al. Shape versus size: Improved understanding of the morphology of brain structures. In MICCAI 2001, LNCS 2208, Springer, pp 24-32, 2001.
6. M.-K. Hu. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory, 8:179-187, February 1962.
7. G. Le Goualher et al. Statistical sulcal shape comparisons: application to the detection of genetic encoding of the central sulcus shape. Neuroimage, 11(5):564-574, 2000.
8. C.-H. Lo and H.-S. Don. 3D moment forms: their construction and application to object identification and positioning. IEEE PAMI, 11:1053-1064, October 1989.
9. J.-F. Mangin, V. Frouin, I. Bloch, et al. From 3D magnetic resonance images to structural representations of the cortex topography using topology preserving deformations. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 5(4):297-318, 1995.
10. J.-F. Mangin, D. Rivière, A. Cachia et al. Object-based strategy for morphometry of the cerebral cortex. In IPMI, LNCS 2732, Springer Verlag, pp 160-171, 2003.
11. S. M. Pizer, D. S. Fritsch, P. A. Yusnkevich et al. Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape. IEEE T. Med. Imaging, 18:851-865, 1999.
12. F. Poupon, J.-F. Mangin, V. Frouin, and I. Magnin. 3D multi-object deformable templates based on moment invariants. In 10th SCIA, volume I, pages 149-155, 1997.
13. F. Poupon et al. Multi-object Deformable Templates Dedicated to the Segmentation of Brain Deep Structures. In MICCAI'98, MIT, LNCS-1496, pp 1134-1143. Springer, 1998.
14. D. Rivière, J.-F. Mangin, et al. Automatic recognition of cortical sulci of the human brain using a congregation of neural networks. Med Image Anal, 6(2):77-92, 2002.
15. D. C. Van Essen. A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature, 385:313-318, 1997.
16. K. E. Watkins, T. Paus, J. P. Lerch, et al. Structural asymmetries in the human brain: a voxel-based statistical analysis of 142 mri scans. Cereb Cortex, 11(9):868-877, 2001.