Statistical sulcal shape comparisons: Application to the detection of genetic encoding of the central sulcus shape

NeuroImage

Volumn 11, Issue 5 I, 2000, Pages 564-574

  Le Goualher, Georges ^a   Argenti, Anne Marie ^a,b   Duyme, Michel ^b   Baaré, William F C ^c   Pol, H E Hulshoff ^c   Boomsma, Dorret I ^d   Zouaoui, Abderrezak ^e   Barillot, Christian ^f   Evans, Alan C ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^f CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

Author keywords

Central sulcus; Cerebral cortex; Genetic encoding; Principal Component Analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHERITANCE; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; MORPHOLOGY; NEUROANATOMY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0034039841     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0559     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bailey, P., and Von Bonin, G. 1951. The Isocortex of Man. Univ. of Illinois Pres, Champaign.
2. Barillot, C., Le Goualher, G., Hellier, P., and Gibaud, B. 1999. Statistical analysis of brain sulci based on active ribbon modeling. In Medical Imaging:Image Processing, Vol. 3661, pp. 312-321. SPIE, Bellingham, WA.
3. Bonan, I., Argenti, A., Duyme, M., Hasboun, D., Chantome, M., Dormont, D., Marsault, C., and Zouaoui, A. 1998. Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on Twin Studies, Helsinki, Finland: IRM Images of Central Sulci: A Monozygotic Twins Study. Twin Res. 1:80-117. [Abstract 008]
4. Bookstein, F. 1989. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11:567-585.
5. Bookstein, F. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Boomsma, D. I. 1998. Twin registers in Europe: An overview. Twin Res. 1:34-51.
7. Borgefors, G. 1984. Distance transformation in a arbitrary dimensions. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 27:321-345.
8. Caunce, A., and Taylor, C. 1999. Using local geometry to build 3D sulcal models. In IPMI Proceedings, LNCS 1613 (A. Kuba et al., Eds.), pp. 196-209. Springer, Visegrad, Hungary.
9. Cootes, T., Cooper, D., Taylor, C., and Graham, J. 1992. Trainable method of parametric shape description. Image Vision Comput. 10:289-294.
10. Crow, E. L., Davis, F. A., and Maxfield, M. W. 1990. Statistical Manual. Dover, New York.
11. Csernansky, J., Joshi, S., Wang, L., Haler, J., Gado, M., Miller, J., Grenander, U., and Miller, M. 1998. Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:11406-11411.
12. Dumoulin, S., Bittar, R., Kabani, N., Baker, C., Jr., Le Goualher, G., and Evans, A. 1998. Quantification of the variability of human area V5/MT in relation to the sulcal pattern in the parieto-temporo-occipital cortex: A new anatomical landmark. Neuroimage 7(4):S319.
13. Kamada, K., Oshiro, O., Takeuchi, F., Kuriki, S., Houkin, K., Iwasaki, Y., and Abe, H. 1993. Identification of central sulcus by using somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and brain surface MR images: Three dimensional projection analysis. J. Neurol. Sci. 116:29-33.
14. Le Goualher, G., Barillot, C., and Bizais, Y. 1997. Modeling cortical sulci using active ribbons. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 11:1295-1315.
15. Le Goualher, G., Barillot, C., Le Briquer, L., and Bizais, Y. 1995. 3D detection and representation of cortical sulci. In Computer Assisted Radiology (H. U. Lemke, K. Inamura, C. C. Jaffe, and R. Felix, Eds.), pp. 234-240. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. Le Goualher, G., Procyk, E., Collins, L., Venegopal, R., Barillot, C., and Evans, A. 1999. Automated extraction and variability analysis of sulcal neuroanatomy. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18:206-216.
17. Lohmann, G., von Cramon, D., and Steinmetz, H. 1999. Sulcal variability of twins. Cerebr. Cortex 9:754-763.
18. Manceaux-Demiau, A., Nick Bryan, R., and Davatzikos, C. 1998. A probabilistic ribbon model for shape analysis of the cerebral sulci: Application to the central sulcus. J. Comput. Assisted Tomogr. 22:962-971.
19. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression appraoch. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
20. Martin, J., Pentland, A., Sclaroff, S., and Kikinis, R. 1995. Characterization of neuropathological shape deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17:545-561.
21. Mazziota, J., Toga, A., Evans, A., Fox, P., and Lancaster, J. 1995. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: Theory and rationale for its development. NeuroImage 2:89-101.
22. Mortenson, M. 1985. Geometric Modeling. Wiley, New York.
23. Norman, G., and Streiner, D. 1986. PDQ Statistics. B. C. Decker, Hamilton, Ontario.
24. Ono, M., Kubick, S., and Albernathey, C. 1990. Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci. Thieme, Stuttgart.
25. Oppenheim, J., Skerry, J., and Tramo, M. 1979. Magnetic resonance imaging morphology of the corpus callosum in monozygotic twins. Ann. Neurol. 26:100-104.
26. Sclaroff, S., and Pentland, A. P. 1995. Modal matching for correspondence and recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17:545-561.
27. Shapiro, C., and Hubert, L. 1979. Asymptotic normality of permutation statistics derived from weighted sums of bivariate functions. Ann. Stat. 7:788-794.
28. Sibson, R. 1978. Studies in the robustness of multidimensional scaling: Procrustes statistics. J. R. Stat. Soc. 40:234-238.
29. Sorlié, C., Collins, D., Worsley, K., and Evans, A. 1997. An anatomical variability study based on landmarks. McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal. [Technical report]
30. Steinmetz, H., Herzog, A., Huang, Y., and Hacklande, T. 1994. Discordant brain-surface anatomy in monozygotic twin. N. Engl. J. Med. 331:952-953.
31. Steinmetz, H., Herzog, A., and Schlaug, G. 1995. (A)symmetry in monozygotic twins. Cereb. Cortex 5:296-300.
32. Thompson, P., Schwartz, C., Lin, R. T., Khan, A. A., and Toga, A. W. 1996. Three-dimensional statistical analysis of sulcal variability in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 16:4261-4274.
33. Tramo, J., Loftus, W., and Thomas, C. 1995. Surface area of human cerebral cortex and its gross morphological subdivisions: In vivo measurements in monozygotic twins suggest differential hemisphere effects of genetic factors. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 7:292-301.
34. Vaillant, M., Davatzikos, C., and Bryan, R. 1996. Finding 3D parametric representations of deep cortical folds. In Workshops on Math: Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 151-159.
35. Watson, J., Myers, R., Frackowiak, R., Hajnal, J., Woods, R., Mazziota, J., Shipp, S., and Zeki, S. 1993. Area V5 of the human brain: Evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex 3:79-94.
36. Weinberger, D., Bartley, A., and Jones, D. 1992. Regional cortical gyral variations in human monozygotic twins. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 12:595.
37. White, L., Andrews, T., Hulette, C., Richards, A., Groelle, M., Paydarfar, J., and Purves, D. 1997. Structure of the human sensorimotor system. I. Morphology and cytoarchitecture of the central sulcus. Cereb. Cortex 7:18-30.
38. Worsley, K., Evans, A., Strother, S., and Tyler, J. 1991. A linear spatial correlation model, with applications to positron emission tomography. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86:55-67.
39. Yousry, T., Schmid, U., Alkadhi, H., Schmidt, D., Peraud, A., Buettner, A., and Winkler, P. 1997. Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus: A new landmark. Brain 120:141-157.
40. Zilles, K., Schleicher, A., Langemann, C., et al. 1997. Quantitative analysis of sulci in the human cerebral cortex: Development, region heterogeneity, gender difference, asymmetry, inter-subject variability and cortical architecture. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5:218-221.