Differential probability of equivalence class formation following a one-to-many versus a many-to-one training structure

Psychological Record

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 617-634

  Hove, OddbjØrn ^a,b  

^a Helse Fonna HF   (Norway)

^b Rehabilitation Serv Adults/Children   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345547403     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395456     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ARNTZEN, E., & HOLTH, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309-320.
2. ARNTZEN, E., & HOLTH, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Record, 50, 603-628
3. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relation frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
4. BENTALL, R. P., DICKENS, D. W., & FOX, S. R. (1993). Naming and equivalence: Response latencies for emergent relations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 187-214.
5. BENTALL, R. P., JONES, R. M., & DICKENS, D. W. (1999). Error and response latencies as a function of nodal distance in 5-member equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 49, 93-115.
6. DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. EIKESETH, S., & SMITH, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high-functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
8. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., NEWMAN, S., & VERHAVE, T. (1992). Interaction among emergent relations during equivalence class formation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 125-138.
9. FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317-332.
10. FIELDS, L., VERHAVE, T., & FATH, S. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 143-157.
11. HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Stimulus familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence or consistent nonequivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81-110.
12. HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (2000). Reaction times and the emergence of class consistent responding: A case for precurrent responding? The Psychological Record, 50, 305-337.
13. HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origin of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
14. SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117-137.
15. SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instruction and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744.
16. SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J. A., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95-115.
17. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
18. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
19. SPENCER, T. J., & CHASE, P. N. (1996). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 643-659.
20. SPRADLIN, J. E., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedure: Sample classification versus comparison classification. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 41-58.
21. URCUIOLI, P. C., & ZENTALL, T. V. (1993). The test of comparison-stimulus substitutability following OTM matching by pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 645-759.