Towards a ‘politics of hope’: Advocating a sixth phase of feminist leisure research;Vers une « politique de l’espoir » : Une sixième phase dans l’approche féministe de la recherche en loisir;Hacia una « política de esperanza » : Una sexta fase dentro del enfoque feminista de la investigación en el área del ocio

Loisir et Societe

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 49-67

  Parry, Diana C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345359212     PISSN: 07053436     EISSN: 17050154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07053436.2003.10707605     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AITCHISON, C. (2000). Poststructural feminist theories of representing others: A response to the “crisis” in leisure studies’ discourse. Leisure Studies, 19, 127-144.
2. ATKINSON, P., & COFFEY, A. (2002). Revisiting the relationship between participant observation and interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium and J. A Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research (p. 801-813). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. BELLA, L. (1989). Women and leisure: Beyond androcentrism. In E.L. Jackson and T.L. Burton (Eds.), Mapping the past, charting the future (p.151-180). State College, PA: Venture.
4. BIALESCHKI, M.D., & MICHENER, S. (1994). Re-entering leisure: Transition within the role of motherhood. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 57-74
5. COLLINS, P.H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge, NY: Chapman & Hall.
6. DENISON, J. (1996). Sport Narratives. Qualitative Inquiry, 2, 351-362.
7. DENZIN, N. K. (1997). Reading the crisis. Interpretive Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. DENZIN, N.K. (2000). Aesthetics and the practices of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256-265.
9. DENZIN, N.K., & LINCOLN, Y.S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. DIMITRIADIS, G. (2001). Coming clean at the hyphen: Ethics and dialogue at a local community center. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(5), 578-597.
11. DUPUIS, S. (1998). Naked truths: Towards a reflexive methodology in leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 21, 43-64.
12. FINE, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and others in qualitative research. In N. K Denzin and Y. S Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. FINE, M., WEIS, L., WESEEN, S., & WONG, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 107-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. HEMINGWAY, J.L. (1995). Leisure studies and interpretive social inquiry. Leisure Studies, 14, 32-47.
15. HENDERSON, K.A. (1990). Anatomy is not destiny: A feminist analysis of the scholarship on women’s leisure. Leisure Sciences, 12, 229-239.
16. HENDERSON, K.A. (1994). Broadening an understanding of women, gender, and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 1-7.
17. HENDERSON, K.A., & BIALESCHKI, D. (1999). Makers of meanings: Feminist perspectives on leisure research. In E. L. Jackson & T. L. Burton (Eds.). Leisure Studies: Prospects for the Twenty- First Century (p. 167-175). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
18. HENDERSON, K.A., HODGES, S., & KIVEL, B.D. (2002). Context and dialogue in research on women and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(3), 253-271.
19. HOOKS, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
20. HUTCHINSON, S., & SAMDAHL, D. (2000). Reflections on the “voice of authority” in leisure research and practice. Society and Leisure, 23(1), 237-250.
21. LATHER, P.A. (1995). The validity of angels: Interpretative and textual strategies in researching the lives of women with HIV/AIDS. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 41-68.
22. LINCOLN, Y.S., & DENZIN, N.K. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 1047-1065). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. LINCOLN, Y.S., & GUBA, E.G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. MYERHOFF, B., & RUBY, J. (1982). Introduction. In J. Ruby (Ed.), A crack in the mirror: Reflexive perspectives in anthropology (p. 1-35). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25. NEAL, L. (1998). The Black arts movement. In P. L. Hill (Ed.), Call and response: The riverside anthropology of the African American literacy tradition (p. 1450-1448). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26. OLESEN, V.L. (2000). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the millennium. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 215-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. RICHARDSON, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
28. RICHARDSON, L. (2000a). Special focus: Assessing alternative modes of qualitative and ethnographic research: How do we judge? Who judges? Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 251-291.
29. RICHARDSON, L. (2000b). Writing: A method of inquiry. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. RIDDICK, C.C., & STEWART, D.G. (1994). An examination of the life satisfaction and importance of leisure in the lives of older female retirees: A comparison of blacks to whites. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 75-87.
31. SCHWANDT, T. (2001). Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. SCRATON, S. (1994). The changing world of women and leisure: Feminism, “postfeminism” and leisure. Leisure Studies, 13(4), 249-261.
33. SHAW, S.M. (1992). Dereifying family leisure: An examination of women’s and men’s everyday experiences and perceptions of family time. Leisure Sciences, 14, 271-286.
34. SHAW, S.M. (1999). Gender and leisure. In E. L. Jackson & T. L. Burton (Eds.), Leisure Studies: Prospects for the Twenty- First Century (p. 271-279). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
35. SHAW, S.M. (2001). Conceptualizing resistance: Women’s leisure as political practice. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(2), 186-201.
36. SKY, P. (1994). The power of perspectives: A case for feminist leisure theory. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 88-96.
37. TETREAULT, M.L. (1985). Feminist phase theory: An experience-derived evaluation model. Journal of Higher Education, 56(4), 364-384.
38. ULICHNY, T. (1997). When critical ethnography and action collide. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 139-168.
39. WIMBUSH, E., & TALBOT, M. (Eds.) (1988). Relative Freedoms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.