Naked truths: Towards a reflexive methodology in leisure research

Leisure Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 43-64

  Dupuis, Sherry L ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

''Self'' In Research; Emotions In Research; Interpretivism; Qualitative Research; Reflexive Methodology

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY;

EID: 0032970488     PISSN: 01490400     EISSN: 15210588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014904099273282     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballentine Books.
2. Bell, C., & Newby, H. (1977). Doing sociological research. London: Allen & Unwin.
3. Berg, D. N., & Smith, K. K. (1988). The self in social inquiry: Researching methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
5. Briggs, J. L. (1970). Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Briggs, J. L. (1987). In search of emotional meaning. Ethos, 15, 8-15.
7. Bullock, C. C. (1983). Qualitative research in therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 17, 36-43.
8. Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1-26). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Clifford, J., & Marcus, E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. Cooley, C. H. (1926). The roots of social knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 32, 59-79.
11. Cotrell, V., & Lein, L. (1993). Awareness and denial in the Alzheimer’ s disease victim. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 19(3/4), 115-132.
12. Cotrell, V., & Schutz, R. (1993). The perspective of the patient with Alzheimer’ s disease: A neglected dimension of dementia research. The Gerontologist, 33(2), 205-211.
13. Crapanzano, V. (1970). The writing of ethnography. Dialectical Anthropology, 2, 69-73.
14. Daly, K. (1992a). The fit between qualitative research and characteristics of families. In J. F. Gilgun, K. Daly, & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research (pp. 3-11). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Daly, K. (1992b). Parenthood as problematic: Insider interviews with couples seeking to adopt. In J. F. Gilgun, K. Daly, & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research (pp. 103-125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Daly, D. (1995, November). How persons generate theory: Second order stories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council for Family Relations, Portland, OR.
17. Daly, K. (1997). Replacing theory in ethnography: A postmodern view. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3).
18. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994a). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994b). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Dreher, M. (1994). Qualitative research methods from the reviewer’ s perspective. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 281-297). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Eisner, E. W. (Ed.). (1985). Learning and teaching the ways of knowing: Eighty-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye. New York: Macmillan.
23. Ellis, C. (1991a). Emotional sociology. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 12, 123-145.
24. Ellis, C. (1991b). Sociological introspection and emotional experience. Symbolic Interaction, 14(1), 23-50.
25. Ellis, C., & Flaherty, M. G. (1992). Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Fanow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27. Fraser, M. R. (1993, January). Revealing ourselves: Notes on the self and personal experience in qualitative research. In J. G. Deegan (Ed.), Cultural diversity: Contexts, perspectives, and voiceÐ Proceedings from the sixth annual conference of the qualitative interest group. Athens, GA: College of Education, The University of Georgia.
28. Friedrichs, D. O. (1981). The problem of reconciling divergent perspectives on urban crime: Personal experience, social ideology and scholarly research. Qualitative Sociology, 4(3), 217-228.
29. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
30. Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Gilbert, K. R., & Schmid, K. (1994). Bringing our emotions out of the closet: Acknowledging the place of emotion in qualitative research. Qualitative Family Research, 8(2), 4-6.
32. Gilgun, J. F. (1992). Definitions, methodologies, and methods in qualitative family research. In J. F. Gilgun, K. Daly, & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research (pp. 22-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Glancy, M. (1986). Participant observation in the recreation setting. Journal of Leisure Research, 18, 59-80.
34. Glancy, M. (1993). Achieving intersubjectivity: The process of becoming the subject in leisure research. Leisure Studies, 12, 45-59.
35. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
36. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
37. Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. D. (1997). Composing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
43. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism & methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
44. Harper, W. (1981). The experience of leisure. Leisure Sciences, 4(4), 113-126.
45. Hayano, D. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects. Human Organization, 38, 99-104.
46. Hemingway, J. L. (1990). Opening windows on an interpretive leisure studies. Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 303-308.
47. Hemingway, J. L. (1995). Leisure studies and interpretive social inquiry. Leisure Studies, 14, 32-47.
48. Henderson, K. A. (1991). Dimensions of choice: A qualitative approach to recreation, parks, and leisure research. Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing.
49. Hertz, R. (1996). Introduction: Ethics, reflexivity and voice. Qualitative Sociology, 19(1), 3-9.
50. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
51. Howe, C. Z. (1985). Possibilities of using a qualitative approach in the sociological study of leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 212-224.
52. Howe, C. Z. (1988). Using qualitative structured interviews in leisure research: Illustrations from one case study. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 305-323.
53. Howe, C. Z. (1991). Considerations when using phenomenology in leisure inquiry: Beliefs, methods, and analysis in naturalistic research. Leisure Studies, 10, 49-62.
54. Hultsman, J. T., & Anderson, S. C. (1991). Studying leisure perceptions: A need for methodological expansion. Leisure Studies, 10, 63-67.
55. Johnson, J. (1975). Doing field research. New York: The Free Press.
56. Johnson, J. M., & Altheide, D. L. (1990). Reflexive accountability. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 11, 25-33.
57. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58. Kelly, J. R. (1994). The symbolic interaction metaphor and leisure:Critical challenges. Leisure Studies, 13, 81-96.
59. Kleinman, S. (1991). Field-workers’ feelings: What we feel, who we are, how we analyse. In W. B. Shaffir & R. A. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 184-195). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Kleinman, S., & Copp, M. A. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61. Krieger, S. (1985). Beyond ª subjectivityº: The use of self in social science. Qualitative Sociology, 8, 309-324.
62. Krieger, S. (1991). Social science and the self: Personal essays on the art of form. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
63. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 256-277.
65. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
66. Lee, Y. (1990). A phenomenological approach to investigating immediate leisure experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
67. Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Lincoln, Y. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 275-289.
69. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
70. Lofland, J. (1996). Analytic ethnography: Features, failings, and futures. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(1), 30-67.
71. Lutz, C. (1986). Emotion, thought, and estrangement: Emotion as a cultural category. Cultural Anthropology, 1, 287-309.
72. Manning, K. (1997). Authenticity in constructivist inquiry: Methodological considerations without prescription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(1), 93-115.
73. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74. Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
75. Myerhoff, B., & Ruby, J. (1982). Introduction. In J. Ruby (Ed.), A crack in the mirror: Reflexive perspectives in anthropology (pp. 1-35). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
76. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing woman: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
77. Pedlar, A. (1995). Relevance and action research in leisure. Leisure Sciences, 17, 133-140.
78. Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivityÐ one’ s own. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 17-21.
79. Reinharz, S. (1979). On becoming a social scientist. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
80. Richards, L., & Richards, T. (1991). Computing qualitative analysis: A healthy development? Qualitative Health Research, 1, 234-262.
81. Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
82. Roberts, H. (Ed.). (1981). Doing feminist research. New York: Routledge.
83. Sandelowski, M. (1994). The proof is in the pottery: Toward a poetic for qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research (pp. 48-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
84. Schutz, A. (1932/1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanstan, IL: Northwestern University Press.
85. Scott, D., & Godbey, G. C. (1990). Reorienting leisure research: The case for qualitative methods. Loisir et soci  et  e /Society and Leisure, 13(1), 189-205.
86. Shaw, S. M. (1997). Cultural determination, diversity, and coalition in leisure research: A commentary on Coalter and Mammaas. Leisure Sciences, 19, 277-279.
87. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1979). Feminist research, feminist consciousness and experiences of sexism. Women’ s Studies International Quarterly, 2, 359-379.
88. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
89. Stebbins, R. A. (1997). Exploratory research as an antidote to theoretical stagnation in leisure studies. Loisir et soci  et  e /Society and Leisure, 20, 421-434.
90. Stoller, P. (1989). The taste of ethnographic things: The senses in anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
91. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Ground theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
92. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
93. Sutton, R. I., & Schurman, S. J. (1988). On studying emotionally hot topics: Lessons from an investigation of organizational death. In D. N. Berg & K. K. Smith (Eds.), The self in social inquiry: Researching methods (pp. 333-349). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
94. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Wax, R. (1971). Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
96. Webb, C. (1992). The use of the first person in academic writing: Objectivity, language and gatekeeping. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 747-752.
97. Weissinger, E., Henderson, K. A., & Bowling, C. P. (1997). Toward an expanding methodological base in leisure studies: Researchers’ knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning qualitative research. Loisir et soci  et  e /Society and Leisure, 20, 435-451.
98. Wolff, K. H. (1964). Surrender and community study: The study of Loma. In A. J. Vidich, J. Bensman, & M. R. Stein (Eds.), Reflections on community studies (pp. 233-264). New York: John Wiley & Sons.