Retraction in Amoeboid Cell Motility Powered by Cytoskeletal Dynamics

Science

Volumn 302, Issue 5649, 2003, Pages 1405-1407

  Miao, Long ^a   Vanderlinde, Orion ^a   Stewart, Murray ^b   Roberts, Thomas M ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; ENZYME KINETICS; POLYMERIZATION;

CELL BODY;

CELLS;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CELL MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PHOSPHATASE; TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOLOGY; PROTEIN;

AMOEBA; AMOEBOID LOCOMOTION; ARTICLE; ASCARIS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL PH; CROSS LINKING; CYTOSKELETON; DYNAMICS; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; LAMELLIPODIUM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPERM; YERSINIA;

ACTINS; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; ASCARIS SUUM; BIOPOLYMERS; CELL ADHESION; CELL EXTRACTS; CELL MOVEMENT; CYTOPLASMIC VESICLES; CYTOSKELETON; HELMINTH PROTEINS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MALE; MYOSINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-TYROSINE-PHOSPHATASE; PSEUDOPODIA; SPERMATOZOA; YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA;

ASCARIS; PROTOZOA; YERSINIA;

EID: 0345306742     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1089129     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D. Bray, Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility (Garland, New York, 2001).
2. T. D. Pollard, G. G. Borisy, Cell 113, 549 (2003).
3. C. Egile et al., J Cell Biol. 146, 1319 (1999).
4. L. A. Cameron et al., Curr. Biol. 11, 130 (2001).
5. J. V. Small, T. Stradal, E. Vignal, K. Rottner, Trends Cell Biol. 12, 112 (2002).
6. M. F. Carlier, C. L. Clainche, S. Wiesner, D. Pantaloni, Bioessays 25, 336 (2003).
7. H. E. Huxley, Nature 243, 445 (1973).
8. K. I. Anderson, Y.-L. Wang, J. V. Small, J. Cell Biol. 134, 1209 (1996).
9. T. M. Svitkina, A. B. Verkhovsky, K. M. McQuade, G. G. Borisy, J. Cell Biol. 139, 397 (1997).
10. K. S. Uchida, T. Kitanishi-Yumura, S. Yumura, J. Cell Sci. 116, 51 (2003).
11. J. Theriot, Cell, 84, 1 (1996).
12. T. M. Roberts, M. Stewart, J. Cell Biol. 149, 7 (2000).
13. J. E. Italiano, M. Stewart, T. M. Roberts, J. Cell Biol. 146, 1087 (1999).
14. J. E. Italiano, T. M. Roberts, M. Stewart, C. A. Fontana, Cell, 84, 105 (1996).
15. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
16. T. M. Roberts, E. D. Salmon, M. Stewart, J. Cell Biol. 140, 367 (1998).
17. In this example, both the bead and the vesicle move, even though the bead is more massive. This is probably because of the low Reynolds number, causing friction to dominate mechanical events (28).
18. K. L. King, J. Essig, T. M. Roberts, T. S. Moerland, Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 27, 193 (1994).
19. L. L. LeClaire, M. Stewart, T. M. Roberts, J. Cell Sci. 116, 2655 (2003).
20. T. L. Bullock et al., Nature Struct. Biol. 5, 184 (1998).
21. D. Bottino et al., J. Cell Sci. 115, 367 (2002).
22. V. A. Lombillo, R. J. Stewart, J. R. McIntosh, Nature 373, 161 (1995).
23. C. M. Waterman-Storer, J. Gregory, S. F. Parsons, E. D. Salmon, J. Cell Biol. 130, 1161 (1995).
24. Y. Li, T. Tanaka, Annu. Rev. Mat. Sci. 22, 243 (1992).
25. B. L. Feringa, Nature, 408, 151 (2000).
26. A. DeLozanne, J. A. Spudich, Science 236, 1086 (1987).
27. D. M. Knecht, W. F. Loomis, Science 236, 1081 (1987).
28. H. C. Berg, Random Walks in Biology (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993).
29. We thank G. Ekman for technical assistance and T. Moerland and T. Keller for critical reading of the manuscript Supported by NIH grant R37GH29994.