Arterial stenting and overdilation: Does it change wall mechanics in small-caliber arteries?

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 855-862

  Vernhet, Hélène ^a   Demaria, Roland ^b   Juan, Jean Marie ^a   Oliva Lauraire, Marie Claire ^a   Senac, Jean Paul ^a   Dauzat, Michel ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Experimental study; Stent; Stent sizing; Wall compliance

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA; AORTA FLOW; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY DILATATION; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; STENT;

ANIMALS; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; DEVICE REMOVAL; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; RABBITS; STENTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 0345074145     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/1545-1550(2002)009<0855:ASAODI>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. New Engl J Med. 1994;331:496-501.
2. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489-495.
3. Lincoff AM. Stent scrutiny. JAMA. 2000;284:1839-1841.
4. Rau T, Schofer J, Schluter M, et al. Stenting of nonacute total coronary occlusions: predictors of late angiographic outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:275-280.
5. Post MJ, de Smet BJ, van der Helm Y, et al. Arterial remodeling after balloon angioplasty or stenting in an atherosclerotic experimental model. Circulation. 1997;96:996-1003.
6. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996;94:1247-1254.
7. Painter JA, Mintz GS, Wong SC, et al. Serial intravascular ultrasound studies fail to show evidence of chronic Palmaz-Schatz stent recoil. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:398-400.
8. Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Carrozza JP, et al. The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting. Circulation. 1992;86:1827-1835.
9. Choi JW, Goodreau LM, Davidson CJ. Resource utilization and clinical outcomes of coronary stenting: a comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiographically guided stent implantation. Am Heart J. 2001;142:112-118.
10. Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, Belli G, et al. Prognostic value of absolute versus relative measures of the procedural result after successful coronary stenting: importance of vessel size in predicting long-term freedom from target vessel revascularization. Am Heart J. 2001;141:823-831.
11. Piamsomboon C, Roubin GS, Liu MW, et al. Relationship between oversizing of self-expanding stents and late loss index in carotid stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;45:139-143.
12. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:267-274.
13. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies - with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. RESIST Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:320-328.
14. De servi S, Repetto S, Klugmann S, et al. Stent thrombosis: incidence and related factors in the R.I.S.E. Registry (Registro Impianto Stent Endocoronarico). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:13-18.
15. Farb A, Sangiorgi G, Carter AJ, et al. Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. Circulation. 1999;99:44-52.
16. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Arterial wall shear and distribution of early atheroma in man. Nature. 1969;223:1159-1160.
17. Friedman MH, Hutchins GM, Bargeron CB, et al. Correlation between intimal thickness and fluid shear in human arteries. Atherosclerosis. 1981;39:425-436.
18. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, et al. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis. 1985;5:293-302.
19. Pedersen EM, Agerbaek M, Kristensen IB, et al. Wall shear stress and early atherosclerotic lesions in the abdominal aorta in young adults. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;13:443-451.
20. Rolland PH, Charifi AB, Verrier C, et al. Hemodynamics and wall mechanics after stent placement in swine iliac arteries: comparative results from six stent designs. Radiology. 1999;213:229-246.
21. Vernhet H, Juan JM, Demaria R, et al. Acute changes in aortic wall mechanical properties after stent placement in rabbits. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:634-638.
22. Vernhet H, Demaria R, Juan JM, et al. Changes in wall mechanics after endovascular stenting in the rabbit aorta: comparison of three stent designs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:803-807.
23. Public Health Service. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: US Department of Health; 1996. PL 99-158.
24. Abbott WM, Megerman J, Hasson JE, et al. Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5:376-382.
25. Stewart SF, Lyman DJ. Effects of a vascular graft/natural artery compliance mismatch on pulsatile flow. J Biomech. 1992;25:297-310.
26. LoGerfo FW. Biomechanics of prosthetic arterial graft failure. Research initiatives in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10:581-583.
27. Kinley CE, Marble AE. Compliance: a continuing problem with vascular grafts. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1980;21:163-170.
28. Baird RN, Abbott WM. Pulsatile blood flow in arterial grafts. Lancet. 1976;2:948-950.
29. Walden R, L'Italien GJ, Megerman J, et al. Matched elastic properties and successful arterial grafting. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1166-1169.
30. Berry JL, Moore JE, Newman VS, et al. In vitro flow visualization in stented arterial segments. J Vasc Invest. 1997;3:63-68.
31. Peacock J, Hankins S, Jones T, et al. Flow instabilities induced by coronary stents: assessment with an in vitro pulse duplicator. J Biomech. 1995;28:17-26.
32. Barth KH, Virmani R, Strecker EP, et al. Flexible tantalum stents implanted in aortas and iliac arteries: effects in normal canines. Radiology. 1990;175:91-96.
33. Sutton CS, Tominaga R, Harasaki H, et al. Vascular stenting in normal and atherosclerotic rabbits: studies of the intravascular endoprosthesis of titanium-nickel-alloy. Circulation. 1990;81:667-683.
34. Fontaine AB, Spigos DG, Eaton G, et al. Stent-induced intimal hyperplasia: are there fundamental differences between flexible and rigid stent designs? J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:739-744.
35. Rousseau H, Joffre F, Raillat C, et al. Self-expanding endovascular stent in experimental atherosclerosis. Radiology. 1989;170:773-778.
36. Robinson KA, Roubin GS, Siegel RJ, et al. Intra-arterial stenting in the atherosclerotic rabbit. Circulation. 1988;78:646-653.
37. Robinson KA, Roubin G, King S, et al. Correlated microscopic observations of arterial responses to intravascular stenting. Scanning Microsc. 1989;3:665-679.
38. De Smet BJ, van der Zande J, van der Helm YJ, et al. The atherosclerotic Yucatan animal model to study the arterial response after balloon angioplasty: the natural history of remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;39:224-232.
39. Barragan P, Rieu R, Garitey V, et al. Elastic recoil of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;50:112-119.
40. Rieu R, Barragan P, Masson C, et al. Radial force of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:380-391.
41. Graf S, Gariepy J, Massonneau M, et al. Experimental and clinical validation of arterial diameter waveform and intimal media thickness obtained from B-mode ultrasound image processing. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25:1353-1363.
42. Mircoli L, Mangoni AA, Perlini S, et al. Reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of common carotid and femoral artery compliance and distensibility in the anesthetized rat. J Hypertens. 1995;13:1689-1694.
43. Jeremias A, Kutscher S, Haude M, et al. Chest pain after coronary interventional procedures. Incidence and pathophysiology. Herz. 1999;24:126-131.