Responses to ozone in 12 provenances of European beech (Fagus sylvatica): Genotypic variation and chamber effects on photosynthesis and dry-matter partitioning

New Phytologist

Volumn 144, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 261-273

  Paludan Muller G ^a   Saxe, H ^a   Leverenz, J W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Chamber effects; Critical levels; Fagus sylvatica; Gas exchange; OTC; Ozone; Provenances; Root:shoot ratio

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS ALLOCATION; GENOTYPE; OZONE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PROVENANCE TRIAL;

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; RICKETTSIA SP. PAR;

EID: 0344991692     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00518.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams MB, Kelly JM, Taylor GE, Edwards NT. 1990. Growth of five families of Pinus taeda L. during three years of ozone exposure. New Phytologist 116: 689-694.
2. Bastrup-Birk A, Brandt J, Zlatev Z. 1997. Studying cumulative ozone exposures in Europe during a 7-year period. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: 23917-23935.
3. Braun S, Flückiger W. 1995. Effects of ambient ozone on seedlings of Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies (L.). New Phytologist 129: 33-44.
4. Chappelka AH, Chevone BI. 1992. Tree responses to ozone. In: Lefohn AS, ed. Surface level ozone exposures and their effects on vegetation. Washington, D. C., USA: Lewis Publishers, 271-323.
5. Davidson SR, Ashmore MR, Garretty C. 1992. Effects of ozone and water deficit on the growth and physiology of Fagus sylvatica. Forest Ecology and Management 51: 187-193.
6. Edwards GS, Wullschleger SD, Kelly JM. 1994. Growth and physiology of northern red oak: Preliminary comparisons of mature tree and seedling responses to ozone. Environmental Pollution 83: 215-221.
7. Fuhrer J, Achermann B. 1994. Critical levels for ozone: a UN-ECE workshop report. Liebefeld-Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Research Station for Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Hygiene.
8. Givnish TJ. 1988. Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 63-92.
9. Heagle AS, Kress LW, Temple PJ, Kohut RJ, Miller JE, Heggestad HE. 1988. Factors influencing ozone dose-yield response relationships in open-top field chamber studies. In: Heck WW, Taylor OC, Tingey DT. eds. Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants. London, UK: Elsevier, 141-180.
10. Janous D, Viteslav D, Oplustilová M, Kalina J. 1996. Chamber effects and responses of trees in the experiment using open top chambers. Journal of Plant Physiology 148: 332-338.
11. Kärenlampi L, Skärby L. 1996. Critical levels for ozone in Europe: testing and finalizing the concepts. UN ECE workshop report. Kuopio, Finland: University of Kuopio, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science.
12. Karnosky DF, Gagnon ZE, Dickson RE, Coleman MD, Lee EH, Isebrands JG. 1996. Changes in growth leaf abscission, and biomass associated with seasonal tropospheric ozone exposures of Populus tremuloides clones and seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 23-37.
13. Kelly JM, Taylor GE, Edwards NT, Adams MB, Edwards GS, Friend AL. 1993. Growth, physiology, and nutrition of loblolly pine seedlings stressed by ozone and acidic precipitation: a summary of the ropis-south project. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 69: 363-391.
14. Krause GHM, Hökel F-E. 1995. Long-term effects of ozone on (Fagus svlvatica L.) - an open-top chamber exposure study. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 85: 1337-1342.
15. Laisk A, Kull O, Moldau H. 1989. Ozone concentration in leaf intercellular air spaces is close to zero. Plant Physiology 90: 1163-1167.
16. Larsen JB, Yang W, Tiedemann AV. 1990. Effects of ozone on gas exchange, frost resistance, flushing and growth of different provenances of European silver fir (Abies alba Mill.). European Journal of Forest Pathology 20: 211-218.
17. 2 enrichment. Brussels, Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities, 239-260.
18. Leverenz JW, Paludan-Müller G, Saxe H. 1999. Response to three seasons of elevated ozone in the progeny of healthy and unhealthy Norway spruce trees from a plantation with the 'top dying' syndrome. New Phytologist 142: 259-270.
19. Lippert M, Steiner K, Payer HD, Simons S, Langebartels C, Sandermann H. 1996. Assessing the impact of ozone on photosynthesis of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in environmental chambers. Trees 10: 268-275.
20. Loibl W. 1996. Spatial modelling of accumulated ozone exposure in alpine regions considering daytime and elevation-dependence - comparison of different exposure patterns. In: Kärenlampi L, Skärby L, eds. Critical levels for ozone in Europe: testing and finalizing the concepts. UN-ECE workshop report. Kuopio, Finland: University of Kuopio, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, 256-263.
21. Manning WJ, Krupa SV. 1992. Experimental methodology for studying the effects of ozone on crops and trees. In: Lefohn AS, ed. Surface level ozone exposures and their effects on vegetation. Washington, DC, USA: Lewis Publishers, 93-156.
22. 13C in leaves and stem, and phloem structure of birch Betula pendula under low ozone concentrations. Trees 6: 69-76.
23. Mikkelsen TN. 1995. Physiological responses of Fagus sylvatica L. exposed to low levels of ozone in open-top chambers. Trees 9: 355-361.
24. Miller PR, Arbaugh MJ, Temple PJ. 1997. Ozone and its known potential effects on forests in western United States. In: Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL, eds. Forest decline and ozone, Ecological Studies Vol. 127. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 39-67.
25. Mortensen LM. 1993. Effects of ozone on young plants of Betula pubescens Ehrh. at different temperature and light levels. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7: 293-300.
26. Mortensen LM. 1994. The influence of carbon dioxide or ozone concentration on growth and assimilate partitioning in seedlings of nine conifers. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 44: 157-163.
27. Mortensen LM. 1998. Growth responses of seedlings of six Betula pubescens Ehrh. provenances to six ozone exposure regimes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: 189-196.
28. Müller-Edzardz C, Erisman JW, Vries WD. 1997. Ten years of monitoring forest conditions in Europe. Studies on temporal development, spatial distribution and impacts of natural and anthropogenic stress factors. Brussels, Belgium/Geneva, Switzerland: EC-UN/ECE.
29. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Reich PB. 1997. Simulating ozone effects on forest productivity: interaction among leaf-, canopy-, and stand-level processes. Ecological Applications 7: 1237-1251.
30. Olszyk DM, Takemoto BK, Kats G, Dawson PJ, Morrison CL, Preston JW, Thompson CR. 1992. Effects of open-top chambers on 'Valencia' orange trees. Journal of Environmental Quality 21: 128-130.
31. Pääkkönen E, Paasisalo S, Holopainen T, Kärenlampi L. 1993. Growth and stomatal responses of birch (Betula pendula Roth.) clones to ozone in open-air and chamber fumigations. New Phytologist 125: 615-623.
32. Pearson M, Mansfield TA. 1994. Effects of exposure to ozone and water stress on the following season's growth of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). New Phytologist 126: 511-515.
33. Pleijel H, Wallin G. 1996. Effects of open-top chamber on air turbulence and light - the possible consequences for ozone uptake by cereals. In: Kärenlampi L, Skärby L, eds. Critical levels for ozone in Europe: testing and finalizing the concepts. UN-ECE workshop report. Kuopio, Finland: University of Kuopio, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, 303-307.
34. Polle A, Rennenberg H. 1993. Significance of antioxidants in plant adaptation to environmental stress. In: Fowden L, Mansfield T, Stoddart J, eds. Plant adaptation to environmental stress. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 263-273.
35. Reich PB. 1987. Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiology 3: 63-91.
36. Runeckles VC, Krupa SV. 1994. The impact of UV-B radiation and ozone on terrestrial vegetation. Environmental Pollution 83: 191-213.
37. Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL. 1997. Forest decline and ozone. A comparison of controlled chamber and field experiments, Ecological Studies Vol. 127. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 367-378.
38. Saxe H. 1991. Photosynthesis and stomatal responses to polluted air, and the use of physiological and biochemical responses for early detection and diagnostic tools. In: Callow JA, ed. Advances in botanical research, Vol. 18. London, UK: Academic Press, 1-128.
39. Saxe H. 1999. Physiological responses of trees to ozone. In: Mohren F, ed. Proceedings of NATO advanced workshop on atmospheric deposition and forest management, Špindleruv Mlýn, Czech Republic. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic (in press).
40. Selldén G, Sutinen S, Skärby L. 1997. Controlled ozone exposures and field observations in Fenno-scandia. In: Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL, eds. Forest decline and ozone, Ecological Studies Vol. 127. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 249-276.
41. Skärby L. 1996. Report from the forest tree group. In: Kärenlampi L, Skärby L, eds. Critical levels for ozone in Europe: testing and finalizing the concepts. UN-ECE workshop report. Kuopio, Finland: University of Kuopio, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, 18-24.
42. Skärby L, Ro-Poulsen H, Wellburn FAM, Sheppard LJ. 1998. Impacts of ozone on forest: a European perspective. New Phytologist 139: 109-122.
43. Spence RD, Rykiel EJ, Sharpe PJH. 1990. Ozone alters carbon allocation in loblolly pine: assessment with carbon-11 labelling. Environmental Pollution 64: 93-106.
44. Stockwell WR, Kramm G, Scheel H-E, Mohnen VA, Seiler W. 1997. Ozone formation, destruction and exposure in Europe and the United States. In: Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL, eds. Forest decline and ozone, Ecological Studies Vol. 127. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1-38.
45. Sullivan JH, Teramura AH. 1992. The effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on loblolly pine. 2. Growth of field-grown seedlings. Trees 6: 115-120.
46. Taylor GE. 1994. Role of genotype in the response of loblolly pine to tropospheric ozone: Effects at the whole-tree, stand, and regional level. Journal of Environment Quality 23: 63-82.
47. Taylor G, Davies WJ. 1990. Root growth of Fagus sylvatica: impact of air quality and drought at a site in southern Britain. New Phytologist 116: 457-464.
48. Taylor G, Ferris R. 1996. Influence of air pollution on root physiology and growth. In: Yunus M. Iqbal M, eds. Plant response to air pollution. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 375-394.
49. Zeuthen J, Mikkelsen TN, Paludan-Müller G, Ro-Poulsen H. 1997. Effects of increased UV-B radiation and elevated levels of tropospheric ozone on physiological processes in European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Physiologia Plantarum 100: 281-290.