Unsupervised non-parametric region segmentation using level sets

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 1267-1274

  Kadir, Timor ^a   Brady, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE QUALITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEMBERSHIP FUNCTIONS;

LEVEL SETS METHODOLOGY; MINIMUM DESCRIPTION LENGTH; REGION COMPETITION ALGORITHM;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 0344983251     PISSN: 15505499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2003.1238636     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. D. Adalsteinsson and J. Sethian. A fast level set method for propagating interfaces. Journal of Computational Physics, 118(2):269-277, 1995.
2. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, and G. Sapiro. Geodesic active contours. In Proc. International Conference of Computer Vision, pages 694-699, 1995.
3. T. Chan and L. Vese. A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the mumford and shah model. International Journal of Computer Vision, 50(3):271-293, 2002.
4. P. Felzenszwalb and D. Huttenlocher. Image segmentation using local variation. In IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 98-104, 1998.
5. R. Guillemaud, and J. Brady. Estimating the bias field of MR images. IEEE Trans. on Medical Images, 16(3):238-251, 1997.
6. Y. Leclerc. Constructing simple stable descriptions for image partitioning. International Journal of Computer Vision., 3(1):73-102, 1989.
7. F. Li, Z. Xie, and J. Brady. Texture segmentation using local energy in wavelet scale space. In Proc. European Conference of Computer Vision, pages 304-313, 1996.
8. S. Li. Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1995.
9. D. Marr. Vision: a Computational Investigation into the Human Representation ond Processing of Visual Information. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.
10. D. Mumford and J. Shah. Boundary detection by minimizing functionals. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22-26, 1985.
11. S. Osher and J. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvature speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79(1):12-49, 1988.
12. N. Paragios and R. Deriche. Coupled geodesic active regions for image segmentation: A level set approach. In Proc. European Conference of Computer Vision, 2000.
13. N. Paragios and R. Deriche. Geodesic active regions and level set methods for supervised texture segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 46(3):223, 2002.
14. J. Rissanen. Minimum Description Length Principle, pages 523-527. Wiley, New York, 1985.
15. J. Sethian. Level Set Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision and Materials Science. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
16. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. In CVPR, pages 731-743, 1997.
17. Z. Tu and S.-C. Zhu. Image segmentation by data-driven markov chain monte carlo. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(5): 657-673, 2002.
18. W. M. Wells, E. L. Grimson., R. Kikinis, and F. A. Jolesz. Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans. on Medical Images, 15(4):429-442, 1996.
19. Y. Zhang, J. Brady, and S. Smith. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov Random Field model and the expectation maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. on Medical Images, 20(1):45-57, 2001.
20. H.-K. Zhao, T. Chan, B. Merriman, and S. Osher. A variational level set approach to multiphase motion. Journal of Computational Physics, 127:179-195, 1996.
21. S.-C. Zhu and A. Yuille. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, and bayes/mdl for multiband image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(9):884-900, 1996.