A model for interpreting work and information management in process-oriented healthcare organisations

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 72, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 47-56

  Andersson, Anna ^a   Hallberg, Niklas ^a,b   Timpka, Toomas ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Care process; Case study methods; Health information system (HIS); Healthcare management; Process oriented healthcare organisation

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTIVITY;

HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM (HIS);

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0344961362     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. van de Velde R. Framework for a clinical information system. Int. J. Med. Info. 57:2000;57-72.
2. K.A. Kuhn, D.A. Giuse, From hospital information systems to health information systems - problems, challenges, perspectives, in: R. Haux, C. Kulikowski (Eds.), Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2001, Schattauer, Stuttgart, 2001, pp. 63-76.
3. Stead W.W., Lorenzi N.M. Health informatics: linking investment to value. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 6:1999;341-348.
4. Prop. 1999/2000:149, Nationell handlingsplan för utveckling av hälso-och sjukvården, Sveriges Riksdag, Stockholm, 1999 (in Swedish).
5. T.H. Davenport, Process Innovation - Reengineering Work through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1993.
6. R.S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton, Translation Strategy into Action the Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1996.
7. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organisations: myths and challenges. Int. J. Med. Info. 64:2001;143-156.
8. J.G. Anderson, C.E. Aydin, Overview: theoretical perspectives and methodologies for the evaluation of health care information systems, in: J.G. Anderson, C.E. Aydin, S.J. Jay (Eds.), Evaluating Health Care Information Systems - Methods and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1994.
9. Berg M., Goorman E. The contextual nature of medical information. Int. J. Med. Info. 56:1999;51-60.
10. Andersson A., Vimarlund V., Timpka T. Management demands on information and communication technology in process-oriented healthcare organisations - the importance of understanding managers expectations during early phases of systems design. J. Manage. Med. 16:2002;159-169.
11. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int. J. Med. Info. 55:1999;87-101.
12. van't Riet A., Berg M., Hiddema F., Sol K. Meeting patients' needs with patient information systems: potential benefits of qualitative research methods. Int. J. Med. Info. 64:2001;1-14.
13. Vimarlund V., Timpka T., Hallberg N. Health-care professional's demands for knowledge in informatics. Int. J. Med. Info. 53:1999;107-114.
14. M. Hammer, Reengineering work: don't automate, obliterate, Harvard Business Rev. 68 (July-August) (1990) 104-112.
15. M. Hammer, J. Champy, Re-engineering the Corporation - ett radikalt nyskapande av processer för att uppnå dramatiska resultatfö rbättringar i organisationen, ISL förlag, Göteborg, 1994 (in Swedish).
16. M. Hammer, Beyond Reengineering - How the Process-Centred Organization is Changing our Work and our Lives, Harper Collins Publisher, New York, 1996.
17. J. Övretveit, Health Service Quality, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1992.
18. P.M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline - The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc., New York, 1990.
19. Berg M., Langenberg C., Berg I.v.d., Kwakkernaat J. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int. J. Med. Info. 52:1998;243-251.
20. Aarts J., Peel V., Wright G. Organizational issues in health informatics: a model approach. Int. J. Med. Info. 52:1998;235-242.
21. Maij E., Toussaint P.J., Kalshoven M., Poerschke M., Zwetsloot-Schonk J.H.M. Use cases and DEMO: aligning functional features of ICT-infrastructure to business processes. Int. J. Med. Info. 65:2002;179-191.
22. Brender J. Trends in assessment of IT-based solutions in healthcare and recommendation for the future. Int. J. Med. Info. 52:1998;217-227.
23. Engenström Y. Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: an activity-theoretical perspective. Art. Intel. Med. 7:1995;395-412.
24. Timpka T. Situated clinical cognition. Art. Intel. Med. 7:1995;387-394.
25. J. Ljungberg, P. Holm, Speech act on trial, in: M. Kyng, L. Mathiassen (Eds.), Computers and Design in Context, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 317-347.
26. Patel V.L., Kaufman D.R., Arocha J.F. Steering through the murky waters of a scientific conflict: situated and symbolic models of clinical cognition. Art. Intel. Med. 7:1995;413-438.
27. Kuipers B., Moskowitz A., Kassirer J. Critical decisions under uncertainty: representation and structure. Cognitive Sci. 12:1988;177-210.
28. Wang D., Peleg M., Tu S.W., Boxwala A.A., Greenes R.A., Patel V.L., Shortliffe E.H. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models. Int. J. Med. Info. 68:2002;59-70.
29. Suchman L. Making work visible. Commun. ACM. 38:1995;56-64.
30. T.W. Malone, K. Crowston, What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? in: Proceedings of CSCW'90, ACM, Los Angeles, 1990.
31. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln, Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research, in: N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Researchers, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2000, pp. 1-28.
32. Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4:1997;94-101.
33. M. Ely, Kvalitativ forskningsmetodik i praktiken - cirklar inom cirklar, Studentlitteratur, Lund, 1993 (in Swedish).
34. T.L. Greenbaum, The Handbook for Focus Group Research, Lexington Books, New York, 1993.
35. Martin P.Y., Turner B.A. Grounded theory and organizational research. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 22(2):1986;141-157.
36. A. Strauss, J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage, California, 1990.
37. B.B. Glaser, Theoretical Sensitivity, The Sociology Press, California, 1978.
38. Orlikowski W.J. CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MISQ. 17:1993;309-340.
39. Kaplan B. Evaluating, informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int. J. Med. Info. 64:2001;39-56.
40. Kaplan B. Objectification and negotiation in interpreting clinical images: implications for computer-based patient records. Art. Intel. Med. 7:1995;439-454.
41. Safran C., Jones P.C., Rind D., Bush B., Cytryn K.N., Patel V.L. Electronic communication and collaboration in a health care practice. Art. Intel. Med. 12:1998;137-151.
42. Mikkelsen G., Aasly J. Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. Int. J. Med. Info. 63:2001;123-131.
43. B.B. Glaser, Emergence vs. Forcing basics of grounded theory analysis, The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, 1992.
44. M Melia K. Rediscovering glaser. Qualitat. Health Res. 6:1996;368-378.