Healthcare professional's demand for knowledge in informatics

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 53, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 107-114

  Vimarlund, Vivian ^a   Timpka, Toomas ^a   Hallberg, Niklas ^a  

^a MDA   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Education in health informatics; Knowledge capital; System development methods; Utility valuation; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

HEALTH INFORMATICS;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAINING;

HEALTH PERSONNEL; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; INCOME; KNOWLEDGE; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS; SWEDEN;

EID: 0033082611     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00151-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. V. Patel, A. Kushniruk, D. Kaufman, Cognitive Evaluation Guideline for Assessing Computer-based Medical Technologies. Technical Report CS#1-96. Cognitive Studies in Medicine. Centre for Medical Education McGill University, 1996.
2. Kaplan B. Organizational evaluation of medical information resources. Friedman C., Wyatt J.C. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. 1997;255-280 Springer, New York.
3. Hanley N. Ussing contingent evaluation to evaluate environmental improvements. Appl. Econ. 20:1988;541-549.
4. Mitchel R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Methods. Washington DC: Resources for the Future. 1989.
5. Portney P.R. The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. J. Econ. Perspect. 4:1994;3-17.
6. Yin R.K. Case study research: Design and Methods. 2nd:1994;Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
7. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal register 58 (10) 1993 4602-14.
8. Haneman M.W. Valuing the environment trough contingent valuation. J. Econ. Perspect. 8(4):1994;19-43.
9. Loomis J. Some empirical evidence on embedding effects in contingent valuation of forest protection. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 24:1993;45-55.
10. Fischhoff B., Furby L. Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility. J. Risk Uncertainty. 1:1988;147-184.
11. Kealy M.J., Montgomery M., Dovidio J.F. Reliability and predictive validity of contingent values: does the nature of the good matter? J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 19:1990;244-263.
12. Harris C., Driver B.L., McLaughlin W.J. Improving the contingent valuation method: a psychological perspective. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 17:1989;213-229.
13. Hirshleifer J., Glazer A. Price Theory And Applications. 5th:1992;Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
14. Chaiklin S., Lave J. Understanding Practice. Perspectives on Activity and Context. 1993;Cambrigde University Press.
15. Wardman M. A comparison of revealed preference and stated preference models. J. Transport Econ. Policy. 22:1988;71-91.
16. Seip K., Strand J. Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: a contingent valuation study with real payment. Environ. Resource Econ. 2:1992;91-106.
17. Michael R.T., Becker G. On the new theory of consumer behavior. Swed. J. Econ. 75:1973;378-395.
18. Lancaster K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econ. 74:1966;132-157.
19. Becker G.S. Irrational behavior and economic theory. J. Political Econ. 52(1):1962;1-13.
20. Simon H.A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69:1955;99-118.
21. Schkade D.A., Payne J.W. How people respond to contingent valuation questions: a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 26:1994;88-109.
22. Mitchel R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Methods. Washington DC: Resources for the Future. 1989.
23. Becker G.S. Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. J. Political Econ. 101(3):June 1993;385-409.
24. Lipsey R.G., Steiner P.O., Purvis D.D. Economics. 8th:1987;Harper and Row Publishers, New York.
25. Becker G.S. Human Capital. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. 3rd:1993;The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. Arias-Vimarlund V., Ljunggren M., Timpka T. Implementation of computer-based patient records in primary care: the societal health economic effects. Cimino J.J. Proceeding of AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. Washington DC. 1996;503-508.
27. Simon H.A. Models of Bounded Rationality. 1982;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. T. Timpka, C. Sjöberg, M. Johansson, N. Hallberg J. Nyce, Action Design version 2.0. AIM project A 2005 DILEMMA deliverable DO. Linköping, Linköping University, 1992.
29. B. Kaplan R. Morelli, Preliminary results from a Social Interactionist Evaluation of a Medical Expert System, In: Degross, S. Jarvenpaa, A. Srinivasan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems. Cleveland OH, December 1996.