Evaluation of salient point techniques

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 21, Issue 13-14, 2003, Pages 1087-1095

  Sebe, N ^a   Tian, Q ^b   Loupias, E ^c   Lew, M S ^d   Huang, T S ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b University of Texas at San Antonio   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Information content; Repeatability rate; Salient points; Wavelet transform

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING; VECTORS; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

REPEATIBILITY RATE; SALIENT POINTS;

IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0344946420     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2003.08.012     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Schmid C., Mohr R. Local grayvalue invariants for image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 19:(5):1997;530-535.
2. Sebe N., Tian Q., Loupias E., Lew M.S., Huang T.S. Color indexing using wavelet-based salient points. in: IEEE Workshop on Content-based Access of Image and Video Libraries. 2000;15-19.
3. Haralick R., Shapiro L. Computer and Robot Vision II. 1993;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Schmid C., Mohr R., Bauckhage C. Evaluation of interest point detectors. International Journal of Computer Vision. 37:(2):2000;151-172.
5. Harris C., Stephens M. A combined corner and edge detector. Fourth Alvey Visual Conference. 1988;147-151.
6. Sebe N., Lew M.S. Salient points for content-based retrieval. in: British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC'01). 2001;401-410.
7. Sebe N., Tian Q., Loupias E., Lew M.S., Huang T.S. Evaluation of salient point techniques. in: International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR'02). 2002;367-377.
8. Sebe N., Lew M.S. Comparing salient point detectors. Pattern Recognition Letters. 24:(1-3):2003;89-96.
9. Tian Q., Sebe N., Lew M.S., Loupias E., Huang T.S. Image retrieval using wavelet-based salient points. Journal of Electronic Imaging. 10:(4):2001;835-849.
10. Daubechies I. Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 41:1988;909-996.
11. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biological Cybernetics. 55:1987;367-375.
12. Loupias E., Sebe N. Wavelet-based salient points: applications to image retrieval using color and texture features. in: International Conference on Advances in Visual Information Systems (Visual'00). 2000;223-232.
13. Stricker A., Orengo M. Similarity of color images. SPIE: Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases III. 2420:1995;381-392.
14. Smith J.R., Chang S.-F. Transform features for texture classification and discrimination in large image databases. International Conference on Image Processing. 3:1994;407-411.
15. Ma W.Y., Manjunath B.S. A comparison of wavelet transform features for texture image annotation. International Conference on Image Processing. 2:1995;256-259.
16. Beck J., Sutter A., Ivry A. Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segregation. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing. 37:1987;299-325.
17. Gevers T., Smeulders A. PicToSeek: combining color and shape invariant features for image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 20:(1):2000;102-119.