Testing for homogeneity of relative differences under inverse sampling

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 613-624

  Guo, Jianhua ^a,b   Ma, Yanping ^a,c   Shi, Ning Zhong ^a   Lau, Tai Shing ^d  

^a NORTHEAST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Asymptotic power; Inverse sampling; Negative binomial; Relative difference; Score test

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; ESTIMATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SAMPLING;

INVERSE SAMPLING;

STATISTICS;

NUMERICAL METHOD;

EID: 0344944039     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00262-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bennett B.M. On combining estimates of relative risk using the negative binomial model Biometrical J. 23 1986 859-862
2. Fleiss J.L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions 2nd Edition 1981 Wiley New York
3. Gart J.J. The comparison of proportions: a review of significance tests, confidence intervals and adjustments for stratification Internat. Statist. Rev. 39 1971 148-169
4. Gart J.J. Approximate tests and interval estimation of the common relative risk in the combination of 2×2 table Biometrika 72 1985 673-677
5. Lui K.J. Hypothesis testing procedures for a series of independent Four-fold tables under inverse sampling Biometrical J. 38 1996 347-357
6. Lui K.J. Conditional maximum likelihood estimate and exact test of the common relative difference in combination of 2×2 tables under inverse sampling Biometrical J. 39 1997 215-225
7. Lui K.J. Test of homogeneity for the relative difference between strata under inverse sampling Biometrical J. 40 1998 227-235
8. Lui K.J. Asymptotic conditional test procedures for relative difference under inverse sampling Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 34 2000 335-343
9. Lui K.J. Kelly C. A revisit on tests on the homogeneity of risk difference Biometrics 56 2000 309-315
10. Lui K.J. Kelly C. Tests for homogeneity of risk ratio in a series of 2×2 tables Statist. Med. 19 2000 2919-2932
11. Mantel N. Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 22 1959 719-748
12. Nam J.M. Power and sample size for testing homogeneity of relative risks in prospective studies Biometrics 55 1999 289-293
13. Schmid C.H. Lau J. Mcintosh M.W. Cappelleri J.C. An empirical study of the effect of control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials Statist. Med. 17 1998 1923-1942
14. Sheps M.C. Shall we count the living or the dead? N. Engl. J. Med. 259 1958 1210-1214
15. Sheps M.C. An examination of some methods of comparing several rates or proportions Biometrics 15 1959 87-97
16. Tarone R.E. On heterogeneity tests based on efficient scores Biometrika 72 1985 91-95
17. Tarone R.E. Homogeneity score tests with nuisance parameters Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 17 1988 1549-1556
18. Tarone R.E. Gart J.J. Hauck W.W. On the asymptotic inefficiency of certain noniterative estimators of a common relative risk or odds ratio Biometrika 70 1983 519-522